Literature DB >> 32132178

Muscle ultrasound is a responsive biomarker in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy.

Rianne J M Goselink1, Tim H A Schreuder2, Karlien Mul2, Nicol C Voermans2, Corrie E Erasmus2, Baziel G M van Engelen2, Nens van Alfen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With drug trials starting soon, responsive, relevant, and patient-friendly biomarkers are highly needed in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). Our objective was to assess muscle ultrasound (MUS) as an imaging biomarker in patients with FSHD.
METHODS: One-year observational, longitudinal study of both quantitative and qualitative MUS changes in FSHD.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with symptomatic FSHD1 underwent a clinical examination and MUS at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. The qualitative MUS sum score increased from 18.59 to 20.32 (p = 0.005) and the quantitative MUS sum z scores increased from 19.96 to 24.72 (p = 0.003). The clinical scores did not change over 1 year. Muscle echogenicity correlated with the FSHD clinical score at baseline (r = 0.61, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: MUS shows a significant increase in echogenicity in FSHD over 1 year. Both quantitative and qualitative MUS correlate cross-sectionally with clinical severity in FSHD and identify structural muscle changes in a clinically stable group of patients. MUS thus seems a potentially responsive biomarker that could be standardized between centers. We recommend its use in therapeutic trials. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that in patents with FSHD1, MUS findings correlate with baseline FSHD clinical scores.
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32132178     DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  7 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular Ultrasound in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Trent A VanHorn; Michael S Cartwright
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  Natural History of Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in Children: A 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Jildou N Dijkstra; Rianne J M Goselink; Nens van Alfen; Imelda J M de Groot; Maaike Pelsma; Nienke van der Stoep; Thomas Theelen; Baziel G M van Engelen; Nicol C Voermans; Corrie E Erasmus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Outcome Measures in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mehdi Ghasemi; Charles P Emerson; Lawrence J Hayward
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Ultrasonography of abdominal muscles: Differential diagnosis of late-onset Pompe disease and myotonic dystrophy type 1.

Authors:  Pei-Chen Hsieh; Chun-Wei Chang; Long-Sun Ro; Chin-Chang Huang; Jia-En Chi; Hung-Chou Kuo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Visual versus quantitative analysis of muscle ultrasound in neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  Juerd Wijntjes; Joris van der Hoeven; Christiaan G J Saris; Jonne Doorduin; Nens van Alfen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.852

Review 6.  Diagnostic Value of Muscle Ultrasound for Myopathies and Myositis.

Authors:  Jemima Albayda; Nens van Alfen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Muscle ultrasound: Present state and future opportunities.

Authors:  Juerd Wijntjes; Nens van Alfen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.