Literature DB >> 32132070

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma as a High-risk Factor in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score-matched Study from Japan.

Liming Wang1, Yasumitsu Hirano2, Gregory Heng2, Toshimasa Ishii2, Hiroka Kondo2, Kiyoka Hara2, Nao Obara2, Masahiro Asari2, Takuya Kato2, Shigeki Yamaguchi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical, pathological, and prognostic differences between adenocarcinoma (ADC) and mucinous adenocarcinoma (MUC) in colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of a Japanese high-volume cancer Center over a 10-year period. From April 2007 to December 2016, a total of 3,296 patients with primary CRC were included in the study. The clinical characteristics of MUC and ADC were compared. Then, propensity score matching was performed according to a 1:2 ratio. Multivariate analysis was used for independent risk factors related to prognosis. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 126 cases of MUC and 256 cases of ADC were studied, as well as the survival rate of each stage.
RESULTS: MUC accounts for 3.82% of the total CRC. Compared to ADC, MUC is more common in female patients (47.62% vs. 38.77%; p=0.045), with higher carcinoembryonic antigen levels (56.35% vs. 34.95%; p<0.001), more ulcerative and infiltrative types (82.54% vs. 72.93%; p=0.016), higher incidence of perineural infiltration (51.59% vs. 41.04%; p=0.018), deeper infiltration (T3-T4: 90.48% vs. 65.84%; p<0.001), and more advanced cancer (stage III-IV: 59.52% vs. 44.79%; p=0.001). MUC is also more likely to recur (24.6% vs. 14.32%; p=0.001). Regarding the long-term survival rate, the OS (p<0.001) and DFS (p=0.05) is consequently worse. After propensity score matching, multivariate analysis showed that MUC was a common independent risk factor for DFS [odds ratio (OR)=4.277; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.327-0.97; p=0.039], and also for OS (OR= 6.836; 95% CI, 0.274-0.831; p=0.009). In MUC, OS and DFS were still relatively worse (OS: p=0.017; DFS: p=0.038). However, only significant statistical differences were shown in stage II (OS: p=0.003; DFS: p=0.007). No significant differences were noted in the stages I, III, or IV.
CONCLUSION: MUC is a high-risk factor for stage II CRC. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be routinely recommended for patients with MUC stage II, and special attention should be paid during their follow-up. Copyright
© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; high-risk factor; mucinous adenocarcinoma; stage II

Year:  2020        PMID: 32132070     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  9 in total

1.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with stage II colon mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jia Huang; Yiwei Zhang; Jia Zhou; Min Fang; Xiaofeng Wu; Yuhang Luo; Qiulin Huang; Yujuan Ouyang; Shuai Xiao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Diagnostic Efficacy of CT Radiomic Features in Pulmonary Invasive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Aizhu Sheng; Pengfei Zhou; Yizhai Ye; Keda Sun; Zhenhua Yang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.750

3.  Prognostic Utility of Apical Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Left-sided Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Liming Wang; Yasumitsu Hirano; Gregory Heng; Toshimasa Ishii; Hiroka Kondo; Kiyoka Hara; Nao Obara; Masahiro Asari; Shigeki Yamaguchi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  The role of apical lymph node metastasis in right colon cancer.

Authors:  Li M Wang; Yasu M Hirano; Toshi M Ishii; Hiro K Kondo; Kiyo K Hara; Nao Obara; Masa H Asari; Shige K Yamaguchi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma: A unique clinicopathological subtype in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  An Huang; Yong Yang; Jing-Yi Shi; Yu-Kun Li; Jing-Xuan Xu; Yu Cheng; Jin Gu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Value of the log odds of positive lymph nodes for prognostic assessment of colon mucinous adenocarcinoma: Analysis and external validation.

Authors:  Huajun Cai; Tianbao Xu; Zhicheng Zhuang; Yiyi Zhang; Yuan Gao; Xing Liu; Jinfu Zhuang; Yuanfeng Yang; Guoxian Guan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Clinical significance of mucinous component in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Chuanwang Yan; Hui Yang; Lili Chen; Ran Liu; Wei Shang; Wenguang Yuan; Fei Yang; Qing Sun; Lijian Xia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Prognosis and Sensitivity of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma without Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Jun-Woo Bong; Jeong-An Gim; Yeonuk Ju; Chinock Cheong; Sun-Il Lee; Sang-Cheul Oh; Byung-Wook Min; Sanghee Kang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Risk Factors for Recurrence of Radically Resected Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Huang; Min-Hong Zou; Jian-Chang Wei; Ye Jiang; Zhuan-Peng Chen; Qiang Wang; Wang-Lin Li; Jie Cao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.989

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.