Literature DB >> 32131866

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients-a randomized clinical trial.

Christopher Adlbrecht1, Raphael Wurm2, Pieter Depuydt3, Herbert Spapen4, Jose A Lorente5, Thomas Staudinger2, Jacques Creteur6, Christian Zauner2, Andreas Meier-Hellmann7, Philipp Eller8, Margot Vander Laenen9, Zsolt Molnár10, István Várkonyi11, Bernhard Schaaf12, Mária Héjja13, Vladimír Šrámek14, Hauke Schneider15,16, Niranjan Kanesa-Thasan17, Susanne Eder-Lingelbach18, Anton Klingler19, Katrin Dubischar18, Nina Wressnigg20, Jordi Rello21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a serious threat in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of this confirmatory, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2/3 study was to assess the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in non-surgical ICU patients.
METHODS: Eight hundred patients aged 18 to 80 years admitted to the ICU with expected need for mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h were randomized 1:1 to either IC43 100 μg or saline placebo, given in two vaccinations 7 days apart. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality in patients 28 days after the first vaccination. Immunogenicity and safety were also evaluated.
FINDINGS: All-cause mortality rates at day 28 were 29.2% vs 27.7% in the IC43 and placebo groups, respectively (P = .67). Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, P = .46) and proportion of patients with ≥ one confirmed P. aeruginosa invasive infection or respiratory tract infection also did not differ significantly between both groups. The geometric mean fold increase in OprF/I titers was 1.5 after the first vaccination, 20 at day 28, after the second vaccination, and 2.9 at day 180. Significantly more patients in the placebo group (96.5%) had ≥ one adverse event (AE) versus the IC43 100 μg group (93.1%) (P = .04). The most frequently reported severe AEs in the IC43 and placebo groups were respiratory failure (6.9% vs 5.7%, respectively), septic shock (4.1% vs 6.5%), cardiac arrest (4.3% vs 5.7%), multiorgan failure (4.6% vs 5.5%), and sepsis (4.6% vs 4.2%). No related serious AEs were reported in the IC43 group.
INTERPRETATION: The IC43 100 μg vaccine was well tolerated in this large population of medically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. The vaccine achieved high immunogenicity but provided no clinical benefit over placebo in terms of overall mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01563263). Registration was sent to ClinicalTrials.gov on March 14, 2012, but posted by ClinicalTrials.gov on March 26, 2012. The first subject was included in the trial on March 22, 2012.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intensive care; Mechanical ventilation; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Vaccination

Year:  2020        PMID: 32131866     DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2792-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  13 in total

1.  Multicomponent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vaccines Eliciting Th17 Cells and Functional Antibody Responses Confer Enhanced Protection against Experimental Acute Pneumonia in Mice.

Authors:  Mohammad Omar Faruk Shaikh; Matthew M Schaefers; Christina Merakou; Marco DiBlasi; Sarah Bonney; Tiffany Liao; David Zurakowski; Margaret Kehl; David E Tabor; Antonio DiGiandomenico; Gregory P Priebe
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A unique antigen against SARS-CoV-2, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Rahbar; Shaden M H Mubarak; Anahita Hessami; Bahman Khalesi; Navid Pourzardosht; Saeed Khalili; Kobra Ahmadi Zanoos; Abolfazl Jahangiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacterial pneumonia: etiology, risk factors, and drug resistance patterns.

Authors:  Muluneh Assefa
Journal:  Pneumonia (Nathan)       Date:  2022-05-05

4.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antivirulence Strategies: Targeting the Type III Secretion System.

Authors:  Joanna B Goldberg; Cristian V Crisan; Justin M Luu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Cell-free expression of the outer membrane protein OprF of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for vaccine purposes.

Authors:  Géraldine Mayeux; Landry Gayet; Lavinia Liguori; Marine Odier; Donald K Martin; Sandra Cortès; Béatrice Schaack; Jean-Luc Lenormand
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 6.  Understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Host Interactions: The Ongoing Quest for an Efficacious Vaccine.

Authors:  Maite Sainz-Mejías; Irene Jurado-Martín; Siobhán McClean
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Metallacarborane Derivatives Effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Yersinia enterocolitica.

Authors:  Wieslaw Swietnicki; Waldemar Goldeman; Mateusz Psurski; Anna Nasulewicz-Goldeman; Anna Boguszewska-Czubara; Marek Drab; Jordan Sycz; Tomasz M Goszczyński
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Immunization and Immunotherapy Approaches against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia Complex Infections.

Authors:  Sílvia A Sousa; António M M Seixas; Joana M M Marques; Jorge H Leitão
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-18

Review 9.  New Agents in Development for Sepsis: Any Reason for Hope?

Authors:  Philippe Vignon; Pierre-François Laterre; Thomas Daix; Bruno François
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Potential Therapeutic Targets for Combination Antibody Therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.

Authors:  Luke L Proctor; Whitney L Ward; Conner S Roggy; Alexandra G Koontz; Katie M Clark; Alyssa P Quinn; Meredith Schroeder; Amanda E Brooks; James M Small; Francina D Towne; Benjamin D Brooks
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.