Literature DB >> 32131779

Germline BRCA, chemotherapy response scores, and survival in the neoadjuvant treatment of ovarian cancer.

Yong Jae Lee1, Hyun-Soo Kim2, John Hoon Rim3, Jung-Yun Lee4, Eun Ji Nam1, Sang Wun Kim1, Sunghoon Kim1, Young Tae Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To analyze the effects of BRCA1/2 mutations on chemotherapy response scores (CRS) and survival in a cohort of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 169 high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients who underwent a germline BRCA1/2 test and received three cycles of NAC at the Yonsei Cancer Center from 2006 to 2018. Chemotherapy response scores were compared in patients with and without BRCA1/2 mutations. The effects of BRCA1/2 mutations and CRS on survival were evaluated.
RESULTS: BRCA1/2 mutations were detected in 47 (28.1%) of the 169 patients. Overall, 16 (34.0%) patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had a CRS 3 to chemotherapy compared to scores of 43 in patients (35.2%) without a mutation. Response scores of 3 in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations were not significantly associated with either improved progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.949) or overall survival (OS) (P = 0.168). However, CRS 3 in patients without BRCA mutations was significantly associated with both improved PFS (P = 0.030) and OS (P = 0.039). In patients with CRS1/2, carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations had better PFS (P = 0.0344) and OS (P = 0.043) than wild-type BRCA genotype patients.
CONCLUSION: In ovarian cancer patients treated with NAC, CRS did not predict survival for BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers but did for BRCA wild-type patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy response scores; Germline BRCA; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32131779     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6688-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  5 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Ami Patel; Puja Iyer; Shinya Matsuzaki; Koji Matsuo; Anil K Sood; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  ARL6IP5 reduces cisplatin-resistance by suppressing DNA repair and promoting apoptosis pathways in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Ye Kim; Entaz Bahar; Jung-Yun Lee; Sunhee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Eun Young Park; Sung-Im Do; Hyonok Yoon; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 8.469

3.  FIGO staging in ovarian carcinoma and histological subtypes.

Authors:  Sean Kehoe
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chemotherapy response score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Liontos; A Andrikopoulou; K Koutsoukos; C Markellos; E Skafida; O Fiste; M Kaparelou; N Thomakos; D Haidopoulos; A Rodolakis; M A Dimopoulos; F Zagouri
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.234

5.  The prognostic value of the lysyl oxidase family in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Miaomiao Ye; Junhan Zhou; Ying Gao; Shuya Pan; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.124

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.