Lien T Quach1,2,3, Jeffrey A Burr3. 1. Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 2. New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Gerontology, The University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: to estimate the association of social disconnectedness and perceived social isolation with the risk of falls and also investigate whether depression mediated this association. METHOD: Biennial longitudinal survey data from 2006 to 2012 waves of the U.S. Health and Retirement Study of adults aged 65 and older (N = 22,153 observations) were examined. The outcome variable was number of self-reported falls over the observation period. Independent variables included social isolation (social disconnectedness, perceived social isolation) and number of depressive symptoms. Generalized Estimating Equation regressions were performed to address the research questions. RESULTS: Regression models indicated that social disconnectedness is associated with a 5% increase in the risk of falls. Perceived social isolation (lack of perceived social support and loneliness combined) was associated with a 33% increase in falls risk. For each increase in the number of depressive symptoms, the risk of falls increased by 13%. Also, the number of depressive symptoms mediated the association between perceived social isolation and risk of falls. CONCLUSION: Our findings were suggestive of the need to consider social isolation when designing falls prevention programs. More research is needed with research designs that address potential endogeneity bias.
OBJECTIVES: to estimate the association of social disconnectedness and perceived social isolation with the risk of falls and also investigate whether depression mediated this association. METHOD: Biennial longitudinal survey data from 2006 to 2012 waves of the U.S. Health and Retirement Study of adults aged 65 and older (N = 22,153 observations) were examined. The outcome variable was number of self-reported falls over the observation period. Independent variables included social isolation (social disconnectedness, perceived social isolation) and number of depressive symptoms. Generalized Estimating Equation regressions were performed to address the research questions. RESULTS: Regression models indicated that social disconnectedness is associated with a 5% increase in the risk of falls. Perceived social isolation (lack of perceived social support and loneliness combined) was associated with a 33% increase in falls risk. For each increase in the number of depressive symptoms, the risk of falls increased by 13%. Also, the number of depressive symptoms mediated the association between perceived social isolation and risk of falls. CONCLUSION: Our findings were suggestive of the need to consider social isolation when designing falls prevention programs. More research is needed with research designs that address potential endogeneity bias.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health and Retirement Study; Mental health; loneliness; population-based study; social relationships
Authors: Tasha Kvelde; Stephen R Lord; Jacqueline C T Close; Simone Reppermund; Nicole A Kochan; Perminder Sachdev; Henry Brodaty; Kim Delbaere Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Jin H Joo; Eric J Lenze; Benoit H Mulsant; Amy E Begley; Elizabeth M Weber; Jacqueline A Stack; Sati Mazumdar; Charles F Reynolds; Bruce G Pollock Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Amy L Byers; Thomas Sheeran; Amy E Mlodzianowski; Barnett S Meyers; Pamella Nassisi; Martha L Bruce Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: Ihab Hajjar; Frances Yang; Farzaneh Sorond; Richard N Jones; William Milberg; L Adrienne Cupples; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jolanda C M van Haastregt; G A Rixt Zijlstra; Erik van Rossum; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Gertrudis I J M Kempen Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.105