| Literature DB >> 32131557 |
Jacopo Tarakdjian1, Katia Capello1, Dario Pasqualin1, Andrea Santini1, Giovanni Cunial1, Annalisa Scollo2, Alessandro Mannelli3, Paola Tomao4, Nicoletta Vonesch4, Guido Di Martino1.
Abstract
The analysis of antimicrobial use (AMU) data in livestock allows for the identification of risk factors for AMU, thereby favoring the application of responsible AMU policies on-farm. Herewith, AMU in 36 finishing pig farms in northern Italy from 2015-2017 was expressed as defined daily doses for Italian pigs (DDDita) per population correction unit (DDDita/100kg). A retrospective analysis was then conducted to determine the effects of several husbandry practices on AMU. Overall, AMU ranged between 12 DDDita/100kg in 2015 and 8 DDDita/100kg in 2017, showing no significant trends, due to the large variability in AMU between farms. However, a 66% AMU reduction was observed in 19 farms during 2015-2017. Farm size, number of farm workers, air quality, average pig mortality, and presence of undocked pigs on the farm had no significant effects on AMU. Rather, welfare-friendly farms had 38% lower AMU levels (p < 0.05). In conclusion, animal welfare management seems to be relatively more important than farm structure and other managerial characteristics as drivers of AMU in finishing pig farms.Entities:
Keywords: AMU; CIA; DDD; management; swine; tail biting
Year: 2020 PMID: 32131557 DOI: 10.3390/ani10030417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752