Literature DB >> 32131103

CT Validation of Intraoperative Implant Position and Knee Alignment as Determined by the MAKO Total Knee Arthroplasty System.

James D Sires1, Christopher J Wilson2.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted technology in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to increase implantation accuracy, with real-time data being used to estimate intraoperative component alignment. Postoperatively, Perth computed tomography (CT) protocol is a valid measurement technique in determining both femoral and tibial component alignments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative component alignment by robotic-assisted TKA through CT validation. A total of 33 patients underwent TKA using the MAKO robotic-assisted TKA system. Intraoperative measurements of both femoral and tibial component placements, as well as limb alignment as determined by the MAKO software were recorded. Independent postoperative Perth CT protocol was obtained (n = 29) and compared with intraoperative values. Mean absolute difference between intraoperative and postoperative measurements for the femoral component were 1.17 degrees (1.10) in the coronal plane, 1.79 degrees (1.12) in the sagittal plane, and 1.90 degrees (1.88) in the transverse plane. Mean absolute difference between intraoperative and postoperative measurements for the tibial component were 1.03 degrees (0.76) in the coronal plane and 1.78 degrees (1.20) in the sagittal plane. Mean absolute difference of limb alignment was 1.29 degrees (1.25), with 93.10% of measurements ≤3 degrees of postoperative CT measurements. Overall, intraoperatively measured component alignment as estimated by the MAKO robotic-assisted TKA system is comparable to CT-based measurements. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32131103     DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  11 in total

1.  Better accuracy and reproducibility of a new robotically-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ari Seidenstein; Miles Birmingham; Jared Foran; Steven Ogden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: an evolution in progress. A concise review of the available systems and the data supporting them.

Authors:  Johanna Elliott; Jobe Shatrov; Brett Fritsch; David Parker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Kinematic alignment fails to achieve balancing in 50% of varus knees and resects more bone compared to functional alignment.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Cécile Batailler; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Stanislas Gunst; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  Safe and effective use of active robotics for TKA: Early results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Bernard N Stulberg; Jayson D Zadzilka; Stefan Kreuzer; Yair D Kissin; Ralph Liebelt; William J Long; Valentina Campanelli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-23

Review 5.  The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Vermue; Cécile Batailler; Paul Monk; Fares Haddad; Thomas Luyckx; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  A prospective randomised controlled trial of mechanical axis with soft tissue release balancing vs functional alignment with bony resection balancing in total knee replacement-a study using Stryker Mako robotic arm-assisted technology.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Nina Zeng; Mei Lin Tay; David Fulker; Christina Esposito; Matthew Carter; Ali Bayan; Bill Farrington; Rupert Van Rooyen; Matthew Walker
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.728

7.  Improved accuracy and reproducibility of a novel CT-free robotic surgical assistant for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Ari D Seidenstein; Michael A Charters; W Trevor North; Nathan L Cafferky; Sridhar M Durbhakula; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  Functional Alignment Philosophy in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning.

Authors:  Jobe Shatrov; Cécile Battelier; Elliot Sappey-Marinier; Stanislas Gunst; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-04-01

9.  HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment - A prospective randomized and multicenter study.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Xin Chen; Xiaoquan Wang; Bo Zhang; Wei Wang; Yu Fan; Jun Yan; Xiaofeng Zhang; Yu Zhao; Yuan Lin; Jun Liu; Jin Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Verification and clinical translation of a newly designed "Skywalker" robot for total knee arthroplasty: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Runzhi Xia; Zanjing Zhai; Jingwei Zhang; Degang Yu; Liao Wang; Yuanqing Mao; Zhenan Zhu; Haishan Wu; Kerong Dai; Mengning Yan; Huiwu Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.