Literature DB >> 32131097

Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Septic versus Aseptic Failure: A National Propensity-Score-Matched Comparison.

Wen-Li Dai1, Ze-Ming Lin1, Zhan-Jun Shi1, Jian Wang1.   

Abstract

Although periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been hypothesized to increase the risk of complications following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), strong evidence linking the two is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine whether PJI is an independent risk factor for inpatient perioperative complications, and increased resource use in patients undergoing revision TKA. We relied on the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify patients with PJI or non-PJI treated with revision TKA between 2002 and 2014. Overall, 5,316 (16.4%) and 27,033 (83.6%) patients were categorized as PJI and non-PJI, respectively. To adjust for potential baseline differences between the two groups, propensity-score-based matching was performed. This resulted in 5,187 (50%) PJI patients matched to 5,187 (50%) non-PJI patients. The rates of postoperative complications, blood transfusions, prolonged length of stay (pLOS), in-hospital cost, and in-hospital mortality were assessed for both groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed within the cohort after propensity-score matching. For PJI versus non-PJI, respectively, the following rates were recorded: blood transfusions, 28.3 versus 18.4% (p < 0.0001); postoperative complications, 27.5 versus 19.8% (p < 0.0001); pLOS (>4 d), 61.9 versus 26.9% (p < 0.0001); in-hospital cost (>$39,929), 55.8 versus 44.2% (p < 0.0001); in-hospital mortality, 0.6 versus 0.3% (p = 0.016). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, PJI patients were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR]: 1.78; p < 0.0001), to experience postoperative complications (OR: 1.56; p < 0.0001), to have a higher in-hospital cost (OR: 1.65; p < 0.0001), to have a pLOS following surgery following surgery (OR: 4.69; p < 0.0001), and to have a higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 2.14; p = 0.019). After adjustment for potential selection biases, PJI is associated with more adverse perioperative outcomes and resource use than non-PJI patients. This is a Level II (level of evidence), prognostic study. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32131097     DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1702187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  3 in total

1.  Understanding the 30-day mortality burden after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  SaTia T Sinclair; Melissa N Orr; Christopher A Rothfusz; Alison K Klika; John P McLaughlin; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-04

2.  Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew Caid; Josiah Valk; Jonathan Danoff
Journal:  Spartan Med Res J       Date:  2022-09-06

3.  Infection and Mechanical Complications Are Risk Factors for New Diagnosis of a Mental Health Disorder After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Michael Figoni; Gopal R Lalchandani; Alexander R Markes; David Sing; Erik Nathan Hansen
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-06-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.