Literature DB >> 32130148

Analyzing Medical Research Results Based on Synthetic Data and Their Relation to Real Data Results: Systematic Comparison From Five Observational Studies.

Anat Reiner Benaim1, Ronit Almog1,2, Yuri Gorelik3, Irit Hochberg4,5, Laila Nassar6, Tanya Mashiach1, Mogher Khamaisi3,4,7, Yael Lurie5,6, Zaher S Azzam8,9, Johad Khoury8, Daniel Kurnik5,10, Rafael Beyar5,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Privacy restrictions limit access to protected patient-derived health information for research purposes. Consequently, data anonymization is required to allow researchers data access for initial analysis before granting institutional review board approval. A system installed and activated at our institution enables synthetic data generation that mimics data from real electronic medical records, wherein only fictitious patients are listed.
OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to validate the results obtained when analyzing synthetic structured data for medical research. A comprehensive validation process concerning meaningful clinical questions and various types of data was conducted to assess the accuracy and precision of statistical estimates derived from synthetic patient data.
METHODS: A cross-hospital project was conducted to validate results obtained from synthetic data produced for five contemporary studies on various topics. For each study, results derived from synthetic data were compared with those based on real data. In addition, repeatedly generated synthetic datasets were used to estimate the bias and stability of results obtained from synthetic data.
RESULTS: This study demonstrated that results derived from synthetic data were predictive of results from real data. When the number of patients was large relative to the number of variables used, highly accurate and strongly consistent results were observed between synthetic and real data. For studies based on smaller populations that accounted for confounders and modifiers by multivariate models, predictions were of moderate accuracy, yet clear trends were correctly observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of synthetic structured data provides a close estimate to real data results and is thus a powerful tool in shaping research hypotheses and accessing estimated analyses, without risking patient privacy. Synthetic data enable broad access to data (eg, for out-of-organization researchers), and rapid, safe, and repeatable analysis of data in hospitals or other health organizations where patient privacy is a primary value. ©Anat Reiner Benaim, Ronit Almog, Yuri Gorelik, Irit Hochberg, Laila Nassar, Tanya Mashiach, Mogher Khamaisi, Yael Lurie, Zaher S Azzam, Johad Khoury, Daniel Kurnik, Rafael Beyar. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 20.02.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MDClone; big data analysis; electronic medical records; synthetic data; validation study

Year:  2020        PMID: 32130148     DOI: 10.2196/16492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Med Inform


  15 in total

1.  Hypocalcemia is associated with adverse clinical course in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alexander Korytny; Amir Klein; Erez Marcusohn; Yaacov Freund; Ami Neuberger; Aeyal Raz; Asaf Miller; Danny Epstein
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Utility Metrics for Evaluating Synthetic Health Data Generation Methods: Validation Study.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Lucy Mosquera; Xi Fang; Alaa El-Hussuna
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-04-07

3.  Can synthetic data be a proxy for real clinical trial data? A validation study.

Authors:  Zahra Azizi; Chaoyi Zheng; Lucy Mosquera; Louise Pilote; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Hyperglycemia on Admission Predicts Acute Kidney Failure and Renal Functional Recovery among Inpatients.

Authors:  Yuri Gorelik; Natalie Bloch-Isenberg; Siwar Hashoul; Samuel N Heyman; Mogher Khamaisi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The prognostic value of heart rate at discharge in acute decompensation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Fadel Bahouth; Adi Elias; Itai Ghersin; Emad Khoury; Omer Bar; Haitham Sholy; Johad Khoury; Zaher S Azzam
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-11-25

6.  The National COVID Cohort Collaborative: Analyses of Original and Computationally Derived Electronic Health Record Data.

Authors:  Randi Foraker; Aixia Guo; Jason Thomas; Noa Zamstein; Philip Ro Payne; Adam Wilcox
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Application of Bayesian networks to generate synthetic health data.

Authors:  Dhamanpreet Kaur; Matthew Sobiesk; Shubham Patil; Jin Liu; Puran Bhagat; Amar Gupta; Natasha Markuzon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Demonstrating an approach for evaluating synthetic geospatial and temporal epidemiologic data utility: Results from analyzing >1.8 million SARS-CoV-2 tests in the United States National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

Authors:  Jason A Thomas; Randi E Foraker; Noa Zamstein; Philip R O Payne; Adam B Wilcox
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-07-08

9.  Spot the difference: comparing results of analyses from real patient data and synthetic derivatives.

Authors:  Randi E Foraker; Sean C Yu; Aditi Gupta; Andrew P Michelson; Jose A Pineda Soto; Ryan Colvin; Francis Loh; Marin H Kollef; Thomas Maddox; Bradley Evanoff; Hovav Dror; Noa Zamstein; Albert M Lai; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-12-14

10.  Sharing Biomedical Data: Strengthening AI Development in Healthcare.

Authors:  Tania Pereira; Joana Morgado; Francisco Silva; Michele M Pelter; Vasco Rosa Dias; Rita Barros; Cláudia Freitas; Eduardo Negrão; Beatriz Flor de Lima; Miguel Correia da Silva; António J Madureira; Isabel Ramos; Venceslau Hespanhol; José Luis Costa; António Cunha; Hélder P Oliveira
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.