E Leegwater1,2, B V C Kraaijenbrink3, D J A R Moes4, I M Purmer5, E B Wilms1,2. 1. Apotheek Haagse Ziekenhuizen, The Hague, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands. 3. Amsterdam University Medical Centers - location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Intensive Care, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics and protein-binding characteristics of unbound ceftriaxone administered as continuous or intermittent infusion. Additionally, to determine the optimal dosing regimen in critically ill patients. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic study was performed in the ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients were treated with ceftriaxone as continuous or intermittent infusion. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with non-linear mixed-effects analysis. Subsequently, the PTA of a 100% T>MIC was assessed for influential patient characteristics using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone was best described by a one-compartment model with non-linear saturable protein binding including the following covariates: body weight, estimated CLCR, serum albumin concentration and mode of administration. For pathogens with an MIC of 1 mg/L, the simulation demonstrated that intermittent infusion of 2 g/24 h only resulted in a ≥90% PTA in patients with a reduced CLCR (0-60 mL/min). Intermittent infusion of 2 g/12 h led to sufficient exposure if CLCR was 0-90 mL/min and continuous infusion of 2 g/24 h led to a ≥90% PTA in all simulations (CLCR 0-180 mL/min). CONCLUSIONS: In the critically ill, the clearance of unbound ceftriaxone is closely related to CLCR. Furthermore, ceftriaxone protein binding is saturable, variable and dependent on serum albumin concentration. Intermittent dosing of 2 g/24 h ceftriaxone leads to subtherapeutic exposure in patients with a normal or increased CLCR. Treating these patients with continuous infusion of 2 g/24 h is more effective than an intermittent dosing regimen of 2 g/12 h.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics and protein-binding characteristics of unbound ceftriaxone administered as continuous or intermittent infusion. Additionally, to determine the optimal dosing regimen in critically illpatients. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic study was performed in the ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients were treated with ceftriaxone as continuous or intermittent infusion. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with non-linear mixed-effects analysis. Subsequently, the PTA of a 100% T>MIC was assessed for influential patient characteristics using Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone was best described by a one-compartment model with non-linear saturable protein binding including the following covariates: body weight, estimated CLCR, serum albumin concentration and mode of administration. For pathogens with an MIC of 1 mg/L, the simulation demonstrated that intermittent infusion of 2 g/24 h only resulted in a ≥90% PTA in patients with a reduced CLCR (0-60 mL/min). Intermittent infusion of 2 g/12 h led to sufficient exposure if CLCR was 0-90 mL/min and continuous infusion of 2 g/24 h led to a ≥90% PTA in all simulations (CLCR 0-180 mL/min). CONCLUSIONS: In the critically ill, the clearance of unbound ceftriaxone is closely related to CLCR. Furthermore, ceftriaxone protein binding is saturable, variable and dependent on serum albumin concentration. Intermittent dosing of 2 g/24 h ceftriaxone leads to subtherapeutic exposure in patients with a normal or increased CLCR. Treating these patients with continuous infusion of 2 g/24 h is more effective than an intermittent dosing regimen of 2 g/12 h.
Authors: Aaron J Heffernan; Fekade B Sime; Nilesh Kumta; Steven C Wallis; Brett McWhinney; Jacobus Ungerer; Gloria Wong; Gavin M Joynt; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Vesa Cheng; Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Fay Burrows; Hergen Buscher; Young-Jae Cho; Amanda Corley; Eileen Gilder; Hyung-Sook Kim; Sung Yoon Lim; Shay McGuinness; Rachael Parke; Claire Reynolds; Sam Rudham; Steven C Wallis; Susan A Welch; John F Fraser; Kiran Shekar; Jason A Roberts Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2022-03-06 Impact factor: 5.577