Literature DB >> 32129099

All bursts are equal, but some are more equal (to burst firing): burstDR stimulation versus Boston burst stimulation.

Dirk De Ridder1, Tim Vancamp2, Steven M Falowski3, Sven Vanneste4,5.   

Abstract

Introduction: Since the introduction of burst spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain, several companies have developed their own version of burst stimulation, which is confusing the marketplace and clinicians of what burst stimulation truly is, the value and utilization of the therapy.Areas covered: We review those two burst stimulation designs and notice important differences. The original burstDRTM stimulation tries to mimic physiologic burst firing, which involves closely spaced high frequency sodium spikes nested on a calcium mediated plateau. This is realized by generating a train of 5 monophasic spikes of increasing amplitude with passive charge balance after the last spike, in contrast to the other burst designs which involve a version of cycling 4-5 spikes each being individually actively charge balanced spikes.Expert opinion: Based on the neurobiology of burst firing as well as abductive reasoning we like to clarify that burstDRTM is a true physiologic burst stimulation, and that other versions being called burst stimulation are essentially clustered tonic stimulation. This differentiating terminology will prevent confusion for healthcare providers, regulators, and the marketplace of what burst stimulation is.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active; burst; clustered tonic; pain; passive; spinal cord; stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32129099     DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1736560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  5 in total

1.  Prospective Analysis Utilizing Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for the Evaluation of Inter-Burst Frequencies.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; Alexander Benison
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.133

2.  Success with dorsal root entry zone lesioning after a failed trial of spinal cord stimulation in a patient with pain due to brachial plexus avulsion.

Authors:  Lucia Lopez; Andrei D Sdrulla
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 3.  Advances in Pain Medicine: a Review of New Technologies.

Authors:  Natalie Strand; Maloney J; Vinicius Tieppo Francio; Murphy M; Michal Turkiewicz; Antonios El Helou; Maita M; Covington S; Singh N; Peck J; Wie C
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-07-29

4.  Study protocol: Effects of active versus passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation on pain experience in persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2: a multicentre randomized trial (BURST-RAP study).

Authors:  Martijn R Mons; Caro Edelbroek; Xander Zuidema; Katja Bürger; Lars Elzinga; Jessica de Vries; Sander van Kuijk; Elbert A Joosten; Jan-Willem Kallewaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.728

5.  Differential Modulation of Dorsal Horn Neurons by Various Spinal Cord Stimulation Strategies.

Authors:  Kwan Yeop Lee; Dongchul Lee; Zachary B Kagan; Dong Wang; Kerry Bradley
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.