Nauzley C Abedini1,2,3, HwaJung Choi3,4,5, Melissa Y Wei3,5, Kenneth M Langa3,4,5, Vineet Chopra2,3,6. 1. National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the relationship between loneliness and end-of-life (EOL) experience including symptom burden, intensity of care, and advance care planning among older adults. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). SETTING: Population based. PARTICIPANTS: Decedents older than 50 years who died between 2004 and 2014 (n = 8700). Exclusions included those who were ineligible for surveys assessing loneliness (n = 2932) or had missing or incomplete loneliness or symptom data (n = 2872). MEASUREMENTS: Individuals were characterized as lonely based on responses to the three-item Revised University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale in the most recent HRS survey before death. Outcomes were proxy reports of total EOL symptom burden, intensity of EOL care (eg, late hospice enrollment, place of death, hospitalizations, use of life support), and advance care planning. Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: One-third of 2896 decedents (n = 942) were lonely. After adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, multimorbidity, depressive symptoms, family and friends, and social support, loneliness was independently associated with increased total symptom burden at EOL (ß = .13; P = .004). Compared with nonlonely individuals, lonely decedents were more likely to use life support in the last 2 years of life (35.5% vs 29.4%; aOR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.08-1.71) and more likely to die in a nursing home (18.4% vs 14.2%; aOR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.30-2.42). No significant differences in other measures of intense care (late hospice enrollment, number of hospitalizations, or dialysis use) or likelihood of advance care planning were observed. CONCLUSION: Lonely older people may be burdened by more symptoms and may be exposed to more intense EOL care compared with nonlonely people. Interventions aiming to screen for, prevent, and mitigate loneliness during the vulnerable EOL period are necessary. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1064-1071, 2020.
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the relationship between loneliness and end-of-life (EOL) experience including symptom burden, intensity of care, and advance care planning among older adults. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). SETTING: Population based. PARTICIPANTS: Decedents older than 50 years who died between 2004 and 2014 (n = 8700). Exclusions included those who were ineligible for surveys assessing loneliness (n = 2932) or had missing or incomplete loneliness or symptom data (n = 2872). MEASUREMENTS: Individuals were characterized as lonely based on responses to the three-item Revised University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale in the most recent HRS survey before death. Outcomes were proxy reports of total EOL symptom burden, intensity of EOL care (eg, late hospice enrollment, place of death, hospitalizations, use of life support), and advance care planning. Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: One-third of 2896 decedents (n = 942) were lonely. After adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic status, multimorbidity, depressive symptoms, family and friends, and social support, loneliness was independently associated with increased total symptom burden at EOL (ß = .13; P = .004). Compared with nonlonely individuals, lonely decedents were more likely to use life support in the last 2 years of life (35.5% vs 29.4%; aOR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.08-1.71) and more likely to die in a nursing home (18.4% vs 14.2%; aOR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.30-2.42). No significant differences in other measures of intense care (late hospice enrollment, number of hospitalizations, or dialysis use) or likelihood of advance care planning were observed. CONCLUSION: Lonely older people may be burdened by more symptoms and may be exposed to more intense EOL care compared with nonlonely people. Interventions aiming to screen for, prevent, and mitigate loneliness during the vulnerable EOL period are necessary. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1064-1071, 2020.
Authors: Alexander K Smith; Irena Stijacic Cenzer; Sara J Knight; Kathleen A Puntillo; Eric Widera; Brie A Williams; W John Boscardin; Kenneth E Covinsky Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kushang V Patel; Jack M Guralnik; Elizabeth A Phelan; Nancy M Gell; Robert B Wallace; Mark D Sullivan; Dennis C Turk Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jonathan G Shaw; Monica Farid; Claire Noel-Miller; Neesha Joseph; Ari Houser; Steven M Asch; Jay Bhattacharya; Lynda Flowers Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2017-09-17
Authors: Ashwin A Kotwal; Irena S Cenzer; Linda J Waite; Kenneth E Covinsky; Carla M Perissinotto; W John Boscardin; Louise C Hawkley; William Dale; Alexander K Smith Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-07-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ashwin A Kotwal; Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Rebecca L Newmark; Irena Cenzer; Alexander K Smith; Kenneth E Covinsky; Danielle P Escueta; Jina M Lee; Carla M Perissinotto Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 7.538