Literature DB >> 32128720

Ensemble perception and focused attention: Two different modes of visual processing to cope with limited capacity.

Jongsoo Baek1, Sang Chul Chong2.   

Abstract

The visual system has a limited capacity for dealing with complex and redundant information in a scene. Here, we propose that a distributed attention mode of processing is necessary for coping with this limit, together with a focused attention mode of processing. The distributed attention mode provides a statistical summary of a scene, whereas the focused attention mode provides relevant information for object recognition. In this paper, we claim that a distributed mode of processing is necessary because (1) averaging performance improves with increased set-sizes, (2) even unselected items are likely to contribute to averaging, and (3) the assumption of variable capacity limits in averaging over different set-sizes is not plausible. We then propose how the averaging process can access multiple items over the capacity limit of focused attention. The visual system can represent multiple items as population responses and read out relevant information using the two modes of attention. It can summarize population responses with a broad application of a Gaussian profile (i.e., distributed attention) and represent its peak as the mean. It can focus on relevant population responses with a narrow application of a Gaussian profile (i.e., focused attention) and select important information for object recognition. The two attention modes of processing provide a framework for incorporating two seemingly opposing fields of study (ensemble perception and selective attention) and a unified theory of a coping strategy with our limited capacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Averaging; Distributed attention; Ensemble perception; Focused attention; Population code

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32128720     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01718-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Seeing the forest but not the trees.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Local and global limitations on direction integration assessed using equivalent noise analysis.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  The representation of simple ensemble visual features outside the focus of attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-04

Review 6.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  An almost general theory of mean size perception.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Mai Toom; Aire Raidvee; Kristiina Averin; Kairi Kreegipuu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceived Average Orientation Reflects Effective Gist of the Surface.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 9.  Distributed versus focused attention (count vs estimate).

Authors:  Sang C Chong; Karla K Evans
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-12-23

10.  Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Synaptic plasticity in self-powered artificial striate cortex for binocular orientation selectivity.

Authors:  Yanyun Ren; Xiaobo Bu; Ming Wang; Yue Gong; Junjie Wang; Yuyang Yang; Guijun Li; Meng Zhang; Ye Zhou; Su-Ting Han
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  A direct comparison of central tendency recall and temporal integration in the successive field iconic memory task.

Authors:  Jacob Zepp; Chad Dubé; David Melcher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.