Literature DB >> 32128555

Detection of Drugs in Oral Fluid Samples Using a Commercially Available Collection Device: Agreement with Urine Testing and Evaluation of A and B Samples Obtained from Employees at Different Workplace Settings with Uncontrolled Sampling Procedures.

Yufang Zheng1, Erik Sparve1, Stefan Sparring2, Mats Bergström1.   

Abstract

The use of oral fluid tests to detect drugs is of growing interest in various areas, including treatment centers, roadside and workplace testing. In this study, we investigated drug detection in oral fluid samples collected using a commercially available device, Oral Eze. Drug detection in oral fluid was compared to paired urine samples, which were simultaneously collected. We also evaluated the collection device by comparing A and B oral fluid samples. Finally, we studied the stability of various drugs in samples stored for at least 1 year. The drug profile was investigated by comparing the drugs detected in oral fluid samples with paired urine samples collected in a treatment center. A total of 113 paired oral fluid and urine samples were investigated for the presence of drugs in the following groups: amphetamines, benzodiazepines, opiates and opioids, cocaine and cannabis. A and B samples were collected from different workplaces through an uncontrolled sampling procedure (n = 76). The stability of drugs in A samples was assessed after storage at -20°C for 1 year. Generally, there was a good correlation between drugs detected in oral fluid samples and urine samples. The heroin metabolite, 6-MAM, was more frequently detected in oral fluid samples than in urine samples, while cannabis was better detected in urine samples. Drugs in oral fluid samples were stable when stored at -20°C for at least 1 year. However, in many positive A and B oral fluid samples, there was significant variation in the concentrations obtained. Hence, the collection device may need to be further standardized and improved.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32128555     DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkaa024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Two Immunoassay Screening Methods and a LC-MS/MS in Detecting Traditional and Designer Benzodiazepines in Urine.

Authors:  Brian Rossi; Francesca Freni; Claudia Vignali; Cristiana Stramesi; Giancarlo Collo; Claudia Carelli; Matteo Moretti; Dario Galatone; Luca Morini
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Impact of Quantisal® Oral Fluid Collection Device on Drug Stability.

Authors:  Michela Riggio; Keyur A Dave; Branko Koscak; Mark Blakey; Charles Appleton
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.