| Literature DB >> 32128154 |
Liu Yang1,2, Liming Lai1, Jihua Zhou1, Qiaoyan Li1,2, Sangui Yi1,2, Qinglin Sun1,2, Yuanrun Zheng1.
Abstract
Reclamation of cropland from grassland is regarded as a main reason for grassland degradation; understanding succession from abandoned cropland to grassland is thus crucial for vegetation restoration in arid and semiarid areas. Soil becomes dry when cropland is reverted to grassland, and enzyme and osmotic adjustment compounds may help plants to adapt to a drying environment. Croplands that were abandoned in various years on the Ordos Plateau in China, were selected for the analysis of the dynamics of enzymes and osmotic adjustment compounds in plant species during vegetation succession. With increasing number of years since abandonment, levels of superoxide dismutase increased in Stipa bungeana, first decreased and then increased in Lespedeza davurica and Artemisia frigida, and fluctuated in Heteropappus altaicus. Levels of peroxidase and catalase in the four species fluctuated; levels of proline, soluble sugar, and soluble protein either decreased or first increased and then generally decreased. According to a drought resistance index, the drought resistance of the four species was ranked in descending order as follows: S. bungeana > A. frigida > H. altaicus > L. davurica. The drought resistance ability of the different species was closely linked with vegetation succession from communities dominated by annual and biennial species (with main accompanying species of L. davurica and H. altaicus) to communities dominated by perennial species (S. bungeana and A. frigida) when soil became dry owing to increasing evapotranspiration after cropland abandonment. The restoration of S. bungeana steppe after cropland abandonment on the Ordos Plateau is recommended both as high-quality forage and for environmental sustainability.Entities:
Keywords: Ordos Plateau; community succession; comprehensive drought evaluation; drought resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32128154 PMCID: PMC7042792 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Results of a two‐way ANOVA with species and years since abandonment (three replicates). F values are shown
| Parameter | Effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Years since abandonment (A) | Species (S) | A × S | |
| SOD | 108.587 | 2,623.444 | 81.225 |
| POD | 67.942 | 7,516.849 | 72.246 |
| CAT | 3,035.603 | 62,608.521 | 1,963.105 |
| MDA | 18.437 | 49.492 | 32.655 |
| Pro | 39,794.482 | 238,488.837 | 10,859.645 |
| SS | 347.859 | 2,274.656 | 931.659 |
| SP | 109.309 | 812.314 | 442.791 |
|
| 5 | 3 | 15 |
Enzymes, malondialdehyde, and osmotic adjustment compounds were analyzed for four species (Stipa bungeana, Lespedeza davurica, Artemisia frigida, and Heteropappus altaicus) in abandoned croplands at five different durations of abandonment (3, 6, 10, 15, and 20 years) and in natural vegetation. The residual degrees of freedom are 48.
Abbreviations: CAT, catalase; MDA, malondialdehyde; POD, peroxidase, Pro, proline; SOD, superoxide dismutase; SP, soluble protein; SS, soluble sugar.
Significance levels:
p < .001.
Changes in SOD, POD, and CAT (mean ± SE, U/g FW)
| Parameter | Years since abandonment | Species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| SOD | 3 | 513.53 ± 7.24 e | 333.10 ± 3.32 a | 214.88 ± 3.59 c | 337.08 ± 3.37 b |
| 6 | 561.16 ± 3.45 d | 267.56 ± 1.18 c | 268.86 ± 1.00 b | 310.99 ± 3.42 c | |
| 10 | 454.06 ± 13.54 f | 181.57 ± 2.30 d | 206.97 ± 2.80 c | 285.39 ± 6.40 d | |
| 15 | 617.30 ± 23.97 c | 179.01 ± 2.19 d | 222.31 ± 0.52 c | 337.96 ± 6.40 b | |
| 20 | 755.23 ± 13.01 a | 294.28 ± 7.36 b | 162.38 ± 4.02 d | 378.23 ± 5.15 a | |
| CK | 674.03 ± 9.49 b | 281.05 ± 6.78 bc | 353.10 ± 11.68 a | 251.29 ± 2.48 c | |
| POD | 3 | 603.81 ± 17.81 b | 0.43 ± 0.02 b | 16.89 ± 0.54 b | 75.97 ± 1.79 a |
| 6 | 629.72 ± 21.96 b | 0.25 ± 0.01 d | 16.47 ± 0.57 b | 51.40 ± 1.08 d | |
| 10 | 863.15 ± 11.85 a | 0.46 ± 0.02 a | 13.54 ± 0.50 c | 61.22 ± 1.20 c | |
| 15 | 596.31 ± 12.52 b | 0.29 ± 0.01 c | 16.52 ± 0.41 b | 47.44 ± 0.79 d | |
| 20 | 425.41 ± 15.86 c | 0.29 ± 0.01 c | 10.84 ± 0.30 d | 73.33 ± 1.42 a | |
| CK | 583.01 ± 17.94 b | 0.30 ± 0.01 c | 18.60 ± 0.70 a | 66.74 ± 1.46 b | |
| CAT | 3 | 438.16 ± 0.77 a | 67.10 ± 2.39 a | 90.53 ± 1.22 c | 102.27 ± 0.72 c |
| 6 | 293.11 ± 0.61 d | 33.52 ± 0.99 c | 82.35 ± 0.29 d | 111.15 ± 0.11 b | |
| 10 | 384.01 ± 0.43 b | 29.80 ± 1.35 cd | 140.46 ± 1.69 a | 95.87 ± 1.39 d | |
| 15 | 164.95 ± 0.60 f | 39.68 ± 0.99 b | 83.70 ± 0.63 b | 70.75 ± 0.35 e | |
| 20 | 317.79 ± 1.43 c | 42.68 ± 0.81 b | 131.57 ± 0.82 b | 69.38 ± 0.67 c | |
| CK | 221.85 ± 2.00 e | 28.07 ± 1.05 d | 92.82 ± 0.81 c | 114.30 ± 1.18 a | |
Data with different lowercase letters are significantly different from each other with different years of abandonment for same species at p < .05 (Duncan's test). One unit of SOD activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme that caused a 50% decrease in the SOD‐inhibited nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction. One unit of POD activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme required to increase the absorbance at 470 nm by 0.01 min−1 ml−1. One unit of CAT activity (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the decomposition of 1 nmol of H2O2/min. Abbreviations are shown in Table 1.
Results of multivariable comparison of MDA, Pro, SS, and SP
| Parameter | Species | Years of abandonment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 6 | 10 | 15 | 20 | CK | ||
| MDA |
| b | a | d | c | b | b |
|
| a | a | a | b | a | a | |
|
| b | d | b | c | a | d | |
|
| bc | f | a | c | d | b | |
| Pro |
| b | f | a | e | d | c |
|
| e | d | a | c | d | b | |
|
| b | d | a | b | c | e | |
|
| e | f | a | c | d | b | |
| SS |
| d | b | e | f | c | a |
|
| b | a | c | e | f | d | |
|
| d | c | b | a | e | f | |
|
| d | d | a | b | c | a | |
| SP |
| a | b | d | c | d | e |
|
| d | e | a | c | b | c | |
|
| e | d | c | b | a | f | |
|
| b | a | c | b | d | a | |
Different lowercase letters indicate values of MDA, Pro, SS, and SP are significantly different from each other with different years of abandonment for same species at p < .05 (Duncan's test). Abbreviations are shown in Table 1.
Figure 1Changes in MDA, Pro, SS, and SP (mean ± SE). Each symbol in lines represents the mean of three replicates; results of multivariable comparison are shown in Table A3. Abbreviations are shown in Table 1
Pearson correlation coefficients for enzymes, malondialdehyde, and osmotic adjustment compounds in four species (n = 18)
| Species | Parameter | POD | CAT | MDA | Pro | SS | SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| SOD | −0.851 | −0.521 | 0.289 | −0.709 | 0.430 | −0.438 |
| POD | 0.288 | −0.475 | 0.793 | −0.341 | −0.016 | ||
| CAT | −0.021 | 0.624 | −0.180 | 0.534 | |||
| MDA | −0.686 | 0.466 | 0.420 | ||||
| Pro | −0.436 | −0.037 | |||||
| SS | −0.286 | ||||||
|
| SOD | −0.094 | 0.574 | 0.570 | −0.651 | 0.131 | −0.537 |
| POD | 0.350 | 0.153 | 0.632 | 0.268 | 0.396 | ||
| CAT | 0.184 | −0.464 | 0.072 | −0.443 | |||
| MDA | −0.027 | 0.272 | −0.063 | ||||
| Pro | 0.168 | 0.756 | |||||
| SS | −0.488 | ||||||
|
| SOD | 0.722 | −0.529 | −0.846 | −0.873 | −0.302 | −0.899 |
| POD | −0.787 | −0.757 | −0.560 | 0.085 | −0.729 | ||
| CAT | 0.656 | 0.363 | −0.126 | 0.428 | |||
| MDA | 0.621 | −0.056 | 0.597 | ||||
| Pro | 0.687 | 0.886 | |||||
| SS | 0.490 | ||||||
|
| SOD | 0.169 | −0.749 | −0.877 | −0.210 | −0.351 | −0.562 |
| POD | 0.069 | 0.004 | 0.293 | −0.117 | −0.302 | ||
| CAT | 0.649 | −0.307 | −0.307 | 0.717 | |||
| MDA | 0.378 | 0.385 | 0.546 | ||||
| Pro | 0.828 | −0.401 | |||||
| SS | −0.311 |
Abbreviations are shown in Table 1.
Significance levels:
p < .05;
p < .01.
Figure 2Changes in MDA, Pro, SS, and SP (mean ± SE) in two plant functions (grass and semishrub). Each bar represents the mean of three replicates; bars with different lowercase letters are significantly different from each other with different plant functions at p < .05 (Duncan's test). Abbreviations are shown in Table 1
Aboveground biomass (mean ± SE) of four species on the Ordos Plateau in abandoned croplands since different abandonment years (g/m2)
| Years since abandonment |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 18.7 ± 2.8 | 0.2 ± 0.04 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 7.2 ± 2.6 |
| 6 | 23.8 ± 4.1 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 5.1 ± 2.8 | 4.4 ± 2.3 |
| 10 | 52.9 ± 4.4 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 1.3 |
| 15 | 133.7 ± 30.5 | 1.1 ± 1.0 | 4.1 ± 1.2 | 2.5 ± 0.9 |
| 20 | 157.0 ± 27.3 | 1.1 ± 0.9 | 3.2 ± 2.0 | 2.5 ± 1.2 |
| CK | 161.4 ± 7.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 |
Results of principal component analysis
| Principal component | Eigenvalue | Contribution rate (%) | Cumulative contribution rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.582 | 65.460 | 65.460 |
| 2 | 1.809 | 25.838 | 91.298 |
| 3 | 0.609 | 8.702 | 100.000 |
| 4 | 1.333E‐16 | 1.904E‐15 | 100.000 |
| 5 | −1.229E‐16 | −1.755E‐15 | 100.000 |
| 6 | −1.608E‐16 | −2.297E‐15 | 100.000 |
| 7 | −2.825E‐16 | −4.036E‐15 | 100.000 |
Component matrix of principal component analysis
| Parameter | Principal component | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| SOD | 0.987 | 0.158 |
| POD | 0.961 | 0.276 |
| CAT | 0.900 | 0.419 |
| SS | 0.910 | 0.414 |
| Pro | −0.622 | 0.571 |
| SP | −0.471 | 0.688 |
| MDA | −0.661 | 0.749 |
Abbreviations are shown in Table 1
Values of the component score C, subordinate function U, and comprehensive evaluation D of the four species
| Species |
|
|
|
|
| Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.035 | 0.629 | 1.000 | 0.671 | 0.907 | 1 |
|
| −0.932 | −0.899 | 0.197 | 0.143 | 0.182 | 4 |
|
| −1.904 | 1.582 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.283 | 2 |
|
| −0.199 | −1.313 | 0.345 | 0.000 | 0.247 | 3 |
| Weighting | 0.717 | 0.283 |
Coefficients of variation for four species
| Parameter |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD | 17.59 | 23.13 | 26.18 | 13.40 |
| POD | 21.81 | 24.16 | 17.66 | 17.66 |
| CAT | 31.22 | 33.95 | 23.26 | 19.67 |
| MDA | 19.45 | 8.00 | 16.39 | 10.17 |
| Pro | 94.09 | 101.03 | 27.02 | 31.19 |
| SS | 39.43 | 7.78 | 28.12 | 33.49 |
| SP | 14.49 | 19.66 | 20.43 | 18.66 |
Abbreviations are shown in Table 1
Soil water content (Mean ± SE) in abandoned croplands since different abandonment years and natural vegetation (%) on the Ordos Plateau
| Soil depth (cm) | Years of cropland abandonment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 6 | 10 | 15 | 20 | CK | |
| 0–5 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 1.1 | 4.6 ± 0.8 |
| 5–10 | 5.1 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 5.4 ± 0.5 |
| 10–20 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 6.1 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 4.6 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 0.9 |
| 20–30 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 7.4 ± 0.9 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.5 | 8.2 ± 1.5 |
| 30–40 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.7 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 7.1 ± 1.2 |