| Literature DB >> 32128098 |
Bagher Pahlavanzade1, Farid Zayeri1, Taban Baghfalaki2, Omid Mozafari3, Davood Khalili4, Fereidoun Azizi5, Alireza Abadi6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: It has been proposed that lipid markers may predict cardiovascular events; however, their effect may vary depending on the type of cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of lipid markers on death from coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke in competing risks setting.Entities:
Keywords: Cholesterol HDL; Cholesterol LDL; Coronary heart disease; Stroke; Survival analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 32128098 PMCID: PMC7038418 DOI: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.35617.8775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Comparison of baseline characteristics between men and women, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) (1999–2012)
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Men | 55.5(9.6) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 126.6(20.6) | 0.001 |
|
| Men | 26.4(3.8) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 104.2(34.4) | 0.008 |
|
| Men | 367(22) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 68(4) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 196(11) | 0.003 |
Data are shown as mean (SD) for continuous variables (P-value calculated with independent sample t-test), frequency (%) for categorical variables (P-value according to the chi-squared test)
SBP: systolic blood pressure; BMI: body mass index; FBS: fasting blood sugar
Comparison of lipid markers between men and women, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) (1999–2012)
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Men | 215.13(42.61) | <0.001 | 215(42.64) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 138.46(35.59) | <0.001 | 138.83(35.71) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 38.39(9.37) | <0.001 | 38.43(9.39) | <0.001 |
|
| Men | 200.45(144.42) | 0.2 | 168(120.5) | 0.15 |
TC: total cholesterol; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: triglyceride
a P value calculated with independent sample t-test
b P value calculated with Mann-Whitney U test
Cause-specific hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval of CHD and stroke events for lipid profile components, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) (1999–2012)
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| TC | 1.04(0.71,1.54) | 0.81 | 1.005(0.7,1.42) | 0.97 |
|
| TC | 1.42(1.07,1.89) | 0.01 | 1.11(0.69,1.77) | 0.66 |
|
| TC | 1.17(0.93,1.46) | 0.16 | 0.89(0.67,1.19) | 0.46 |
TC: total cholesterol; LDL: low density lipoprotein; HDL: high density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; P-value based on Cause-specific hazard model
a Model was adjusted for: systolic blood pressure, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, and lipid-lowering medications
b Model was adjusted for: gender, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, and lipid-lowering medications
Sub-distribution hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of CHD and stroke events for lipid profile components, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) (1999–2012)
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub-distribution hazard (95% CI) |
| Sub-distribution hazard (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| TC | 0.6(0.1,3.55) | 0.58 | 0.69(0.13,3.6) | 0.67 |
|
| TC | 3.84(0.553,26.29) | 0.17 | 1.56(0.24,9.78) | 0.64 |
|
| TC | 0.6(0.1,3.55) | 0.58 | 0.44(0.12,1.54) | 0.2 |
C: total cholesterol; LDL: low density lipoprotein; HDL: high density lipoprotein; TG: triglycerides; P-value: based on Sub-distribution hazard (Fine-Gray) model
a Model was adjusted for: systolic blood pressure, body mass index, diabetes, smoking and lipid-lowering medications
b Model was adjusted for: gender, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, diabetes, smoking and lipid-lowering medications
Figure 1Cumulative incidence curve for each cause of mortality and for each gender, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS) (1999–2012)