Literature DB >> 32128095

Protection of BALB/c mice against pathogenic Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis by vaccination with recombinant Omp16.

Hamed Alizadeh1, Mehrooz Dezfulian1, Mehdi Rahnema2, Jalil Fallah3, Davoud Esmaeili4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prevention of the globally spread zoonotic infection, brucellosis which affects an extensive range of hosts is still challenging researchers. There are no approved vaccines for the prevention of human disease and those used for animal brucellosis have adverse properties, which limit their application. We investigated the immunological and protective effects of recombinant 16 kDa outer membrane protein of Brucella abortus (Omp16) which introduced a new candidate for brucellosis subunit vaccine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brucella Omp16 gene was cloned in pET-23a and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Recombinant Omp16 (rOmp16) was purified using nickel resin and confirmed by Western blot analysis. BALB/c mice were immunized with rOmp16, afterward, specific serum antibodies and cytokine responses were evaluated. Protection of immunized mice against pathogenic B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M was evaluated by the intraperitoneal bacterial challenge.
RESULTS: Sequencing results of the recombinant plasmid vector along with Western blotting confirmed the cloning procedure. Recognition of rOmp16 by specific IgG from serum samples of infected cases suggests the stimulation of immune response to this protein. Significant total serum IgG along with remarkable IgG1 and IgG2a response to the protein was recorded. A significant increase in IFN-γ, and IL-4 levels were observed from splenocyte cultures of immunized mice which were stimulated with rOmp16 suggesting the development of T-lymphocyte mediated immunity against the recombinant antigen.
CONCLUSION: The intraperitoneal challenge with B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M confirmed that rOmp16 is able to elicit efficient protective immune responses in the animal host.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BALB/c mice; Brucella; Brucellosis; Outer membrane protein; Recombinant protein

Year:  2019        PMID: 32128095      PMCID: PMC7038423          DOI: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.36369.8665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 2008-3866            Impact factor:   2.699


Introduction

Brucella is Gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria which cause brucellosis in both animals and humans (1, 2). The most important Brucella pathogens for human and animals are Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis (2-4). The animal infection causes abortion and reduces fertility in livestock, which leads to significant economic losses all over the world (4, 5). Human brucellosis is known to have nonspecific manifestations such as undulant fever, osteomyelitis, and arthritis (1, 6-8). B. melitensis Rev 1 and B. abortus S19 are live attenuated vaccine strains that are currently used in sheep and cattle, respectively. They were successful in disease eradication and control programs in some countries (3, 9). However, there are considerable troubles associated with the use of these vaccine strains. The most important problems are development of agglutinating antibodies in vaccinated animals which are indistinguishable from those elicited by natural infection (10, 11). Moreover, antibodies against Brucella LPS could cross-react with some Gram-negative bacteria (12, 13). The new brucellosis vaccines overcome to these problems and have some properties that’s great importance to veterinary medicine. One of the major aims of researches in brucellosis is the identification of Brucella antigens, eliciting immune responses, which might be useful for the development of subunit vaccines or diagnostic tests that avoid the disadvantages of currently used ones (13-15). Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Brucella are considered by far as the immunogenic component of the bacterial cell wall (13, 16) and there are many reports which describe their protective effects in animal models (17-25). Omp16 is an outer membrane protein which included in all Brucella strains (26-28). In this report, we describe the full-length cloning, expression, and purification of Omp16 and assessment of immunological properties of this recombinant protein in BALB/c mouse model.

Materials and Methods

B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M were routinely cultured on Brucella agar and incubated in 37 °C for 72 hr. Escherichia coli DH5α and E. coli BL21 (DE3) were used as prokaryotic hosts for cloning and expression respectively and were cultured using LB broth/agar Merk- Germany. pJET1.2 (Thermo Scientific) and pET-28a (+) (Novagen) were applied as cloning and expression plasmid vectors. A primer pair was designed to amplify the whole coding region of Omp16 which were F5’-TTAGGATCCATGCGCCGTATCCAGTCGAT-3 and R5’- AACAAGCTTTTACCGTCCGGCCCCGTTG -3’ including restriction sequences of BamHI and HindIII at the 5’-end respectively (underlined). Complete ORF or Omp16 gene was amplified with PrimSTAR® HS DNA polymerase (TaKaRa) and Blunt ended amplified product was cloned in pJET1.2 plasmid vector by clonJET® PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Scientific). Recombinant pJET1.2-Omp16 constructs were sequenced with pJET1.2 specific primers (Thermo Scientific) in an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer machine. Sequencing results were analyzed with Vector NTITM advanced 11.0 (Invitrogen). The Omp16 was then sub cloned in pET-23a (+) vector between BamHI and HindIII restriction sites (pET28-Omp16). Using T7 promoter/terminator universal primers, recombinant plasmids were confirmed by sequencing as described above. pET28-Omp16 was transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3). Recombinant colonies were grown in LB medium containing kanamycin (30 µg/ml) at 37 °C to reach an OD620. Subsequently, IPTG at the final concentration of 1 mM was added to the growing culture, in order to expression of recombinant Omp16 (rOmp16). Samples of three hours of induction at 37 °C were collected along with a non-induction sample as the control. Sample lysates were analyzed by 12.5% resolving polyacrylamide in mini gels (Bio-Rad) and followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 staining (29). The cell pellet from two liters of 2-hour induced culture was collected. rOmp16 was purified according to the previously described hybrid procedure (29). Totally, the cell pellet was suspended and lysed thoroughly in buffer containing 8 M urea (Buffer B, pH 8.5, QIAGEN). Cell debris were removed by centrifugation and Ni-NTA resin (QIAGEN) was added to the clear lysate, then mixed by rotation for one hour. The resin was washed twice with buffer C (8 M urea, pH 6.3) and urea was removed by washing the resin with buffers containing decreasing urea concentrations (8, 6, 4, 2, 1, and 0 M, pH 8.5). The column was washed with native wash buffer (40 mM imidazole, pH 8.5), and 6-His-tagged rOmp16 was eluted with 350 mM imidazole. Imidazole was subsequently removed by dialysis against PBS (pH 7.5). Recombinant protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and quantified by spectrophotometer NanoDrop® 2000 (Thermo Scientific, USA). After purification of rOMP16, in order to remove LPS, EtEraser™ HP Endotoxin Removal Kit (BioEndo, China) was used according to related guideline. Western blot analysis was performed according to previously described procedures (29). Briefly, purified rOmp16 was electro-transferred from unstained 12.5% polyacrylamide gel to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane in a semidry transfer apparatus (Trans-Blot® SD, Bio-Rad, USA). The sheet was blocked by 2% bovine serum albumin dissolved in PBS (pH 7.5) for one hour at 37°C while rocking. The protein was probed by rabbit polyclonal anti-serum against Brucella outer membrane protein complex (prepared in our laboratory). HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG applied to the sheet as the secondary antibody. The sheet was finally developed with chemiluminescent substrate (ECL) under standard conditions and the appearance of fluorescent bands was immediately recorded on radiographic films. Purified rOmp16 were also subjected to Western blot analysis and probed by 1:3000 dilutions of 3 serum samples from brucellosis patients. These were treated with HRP-Anti-Human IgG and developed as described above. Six- to seven-week-old Female BALB/c mice were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Production Department at Pasteur Institute of Iran (Research & Production Complex, Alborz). Animal maintenance, handling, and all experiments were performed with strict accordance to institutional ethical guidelines and international protocols (30). Mice were immunized subcutaneously with rOmp16 formulated in Freund’s adjuvant in three dose with 10-day intervals. Negative control non-immunized mice group received phosphate buffered saline simultaneously. The two vaccine groups were considered which received a single intraperitoneal dose containing 104 CFU of B. abortus S19 and B. melitensis Rev1 (25). Mice were bled from the retroocular vein at days 0, 10, 20 (prior to antigen administration), 30, 40 and 50. Serum samples were collected and stored at -80 °C. All samples were investigated for specific total serum IgG (Sigma, USA), IgG1 and IgG2a levels using rOmp16 as capture protein via indirect ELISA (ISO-2; Sigma) as described before (29). IgG1 and IgG2a were assessed at a single dilution of 1:100 in sera collected at day 30. Ten days after last immunization dose, splenectomy was performed and spleen lymphocytes from sacrificed mice were cultured in 24 and 96 well-plates at 4 × 106 and 2.5 × 105 cells per-well, respectively, using RPMI (Gibco®, France) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco®), Pen-Strep (Gibco®) and non-essential amino acids (Gibco®). Cultures were separately stimulated with 5 µg/ml of rOmp16 and incubated for 72 hr at 37 °C and 5% of CO2. Lymphocytic proliferation was assayed in 96-well plates by BrdU (Roche). Cell-free culture media, collected from 24-well plates were examined by specific ELISA for evaluation of IL-4 and IFN-γ levels (R&D). Four weeks after the last protein booster dose, 8 mice from each group were challenged intraperitoneally with 105 CFU of B. abortus 544 and 8 mice were challenged similarly infected with B. melitensis 16M pathogenic strains. Mice were maintained under strict biosafety considerations for 14 days. Then, mice were sacrificed, their spleen were removed and homogenized, and dilutions from spleen suspensions were inoculated and spread on Brucella agar plates (duplicates for each mouse). Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 72 hr; Brucella colonies were counted subsequently. Data from all experiments were collected in and analyzed with the software IBM® SPSS® Statistics (Version 22.0) using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and differences between groups were processed with LSD test or Games-Howell test for unequal variances upon homogeneity status.

Results

Omp16 gene was successfully cloned in pJET1.2 and subsequently sub cloned in pET-28a (+). Alignment of recombinant pJET-Omp16 and pET23-Omp16 sequencing results with reference sequences showed complete identity and no mutation in cloned ORF. SDS-PAGE analysis of induced culture samples of E. coli BL21(DE3) which was transformed with pET23-Omp16 compared to non-induced one and non-transformed host shows the expression of an approximately ~16kDa protein (Figure 1). The expression reaches the maximum rate 2 hr after induction and remains unchanged in next hour. Purification of the protein was fulfilled using Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen; USA) via a hybrid method of denaturation and renaturation (Figure 1). A significant high yield of the rOmp16 was achieved through this method, which was measured to 3.4 mg/1 lit of induced culture.
Figure 1

Omp16 gene expression was analyzed in SDS-PAGE. Moreover, the efficiency of purification process of rOMP16 was showed in lane 5. Recombinant host was induced with IPTG in order to express rOMP16 during 4 hr

Purified recombinant rOmp16 was successfully recognized by rabbit polyclonal anti-serum and sera from three microbiologically confirmed hospitalized patients (Figure 2). This indicates that epitopes of rOmp16 are at least partially similar to the native component.
Figure 2

The Western blot detection of purified rOmp16

Levels of total serum IgG total, IgG1 and IgG2a subclasses are illustrated (Figure 3). Level of all antigen-specific IgG subclasses was high in mice immunized with rOmp16 (P<0.05) in comparison with PBS group.
Figure 3

The immunoassay test results were showed mice which immunes by rOmp16 has significant difference with non-immune group. Moreover, there are no significant difference among third groups (except PBS group)

Lymphocyte stimulation indices and cytokine levels produced from lymphocyte cultures showed that mice which were immunized with rOmp16 produced high levels of IFN-γ, and IL-4 in response to stimulation with the same protein (P≤0.05) (Figure 3). Mice were challenged intraperitoneally with B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M and showed the best protection as it was expected (P<0.05). Mice which were immunized by rOmp16 also showed a significant protection against both pathogenic strains (P<0.05). Protection conferred by rOmp16 was not statistically different between mice which were vaccinated with B. abortus S19 and B. melitensis Rev-1 (P≥0.05). At post-infection, mice were euthanized and spleen was removed. Figure 4 shows a chart which colony count of every groups. There should be a clear reduction in the number of colonies as CFU. If the mouse has cleared the Brucella infection (i.e. detection limit = 100 CFU/tissue), then <5 Brucella colonies will be present on the brucella agar plate.
Figure 4

Colony count of splenocye related to each groups Colony count of Brucell spp. in different groups of Mice spleen culture on brucella agar plates

Omp16 gene expression was analyzed in SDS-PAGE. Moreover, the efficiency of purification process of rOMP16 was showed in lane 5. Recombinant host was induced with IPTG in order to express rOMP16 during 4 hr Columns 1, 2, 3 and 4 related to the before and two, three and four hours after the induction of expression the rOmp16 by the IPTG, respectively. Column 5 is purified rOmp16 and column 6 is protein marker (down to up respectively, 14.4, 18.4, 25, 35, 45, 66.2 and 116 KDa) The Western blot detection of purified rOmp16 Prestained protein marker contain 20, 30, 35, 45, 50, 55 and 60 KDa The immunoassay test results were showed mice which immunes by rOmp16 has significant difference with non-immune group. Moreover, there are no significant difference among third groups (except PBS group) Colony count of splenocye related to each groups Colony count of Brucell spp. in different groups of Mice spleen culture on brucella agar plates

Discussion

Brucellosis is a globally spread zoonotic infection and is known to be endemic in most regions of the developing countries (31-38). The main strategy for controlling the disease is vaccination the livestock and elimination the infected animals; there are no confirmed vaccines for human (15, 33, 39-41). Brucella proteins, especially those located in the outer membrane of the bacterial cell interact with host immune system upon infection and may serve as effective candidates for subunit vaccines (16, 42-45). Although the major antigen is lipopolysaccharide of smooth Brucella, outer membrane proteins are important in host immune responses to the pathogen (14, 46). Omp16 as a major outer surface antigens of Brucella is a porin protein, which has been previously shown that its antibody was recognized in serum of brucellosis patients (47-50). These properties suggest that Omp16 can be investigated as a candidate for subunit vaccines against Brucellosis. Omp16 was successfully produced and purified in E. coli bacteria with a significant purity and yield. In our strategy, we used pET23a (+) as expression vector which adds a minimum of amino acids to the resulting protein. Sung et al. reported the production of Omp16 in a pMAL system in which the target is inserted down-stream of the male gene which encodes maltose-binding protein (MBP) as compared with current study (19). The target protein is fused with the MBP as a solubility tag and purification system which is more different from the native one. Our method for purification the rOmp16, yielded a significant amount of soluble protein to which no additional solubility tags are attached and is more closely related to the native protein structure. Purified rOmp16 was recognized by rabbit polyclonal anti serum against Brucella outer membrane protein complex which suggest that the produced protein has antigenic properties to the native bacterial OMP. Reaction with antibodies in sera from brucellosis patients implies that specific immune responses are developed against Omp16 upon infection of the host with Brucella. Total IgG response to the rOmp16 was significant and indicated that the protein is a potent antigen which can elicit the remarkable antibody response in immunized mice. The specific IgG1 and IgG2a levels also show that the protein is capable to inducing both subclasses with a significant difference rather than the non-immunized mice. Pasquerich et al. in Argentina have been established that immunization with purified lipidated Omp19 in adjuvant elicits protection against B. abortus infection. They are also founded that Omp16 of B. abortus as a recombinant lipoprotein in adjuvant elicited protection against B. abortus infection, further confirming that Omp16 is an important candidate for a vaccine against Brucella. They are showed that immunization with lipidated Omp16 (L-Omp16) or L-Omp19 in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) conferred significant protection against B. abortus infection and vaccination with unlipidated Omp16 (U-Omp16) or U-Omp19 in IFA induced a higher degree of protection than the respective lipidated versions. Overall the results of these researchers indicate that U-Omp16 or U-Omp19 would be a useful candidate for a subunit vaccine against human and animal brucellosis (25). Lymphocyte proliferation responses and high level of IFN-γ production in splenocyte cultures from mice which were immunized with rOmp16 clearly show the development of the Th-1 type of immune responses against rOmp16. Although it is less than attenuated vaccine strains, immunization with rOmp16 elicited significant protection in BALB/c mice against both B. abortus 544 and B. melitensis 16M pathogenic strais which is in full consistency with cytokine responses. The low levels of antibodies or cytokines in mice which received attenuated vaccines may be attributable to the lower amount of Omp16 in the bacterial cell as compared to pure protein dose; this may result in the development of the smaller number of specific T-lymphocyte clones which recognize Omp16 epitopes.

Conclusion

Put together, rOmp16 is capable of inducing both antibody and cytokine responses which indicate a Th-1 type response and suggest Omp16 as an outstanding candidate for designing subunit vaccines against brucellosis.
  45 in total

1.  Brucellosis in Iran: Why Not Eradicated?

Authors:  Hamed Ebrahimzadeh Leylabadlo; Abed Zahedi Bialvaei; Hossein Samadi Kafil
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Proteomic analysis of Brucella abortus cell envelope and identification of immunogenic candidate proteins for vaccine development.

Authors:  Joseph P Connolly; Diego Comerci; Timothy G Alefantis; Alexander Walz; Marian Quan; Ryan Chafin; Paul Grewal; Cesar V Mujer; Rodolfo A Ugalde; Vito G DelVecchio
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 3.  Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future.

Authors:  Gerhardt G Schurig; Nammalwar Sriranganathan; Michael J Corbel
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  A comparative approach to strategies for cloning, expression, and purification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mycolyl transferase 85B and evaluation of immune responses in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Haniyeh Aghababa; Ashraf Mohabati Mobarez; Nima Khoramabadi; Mehrdad Behmanesh; Mehdi Mahdavi; Majid Tebianian; Mehdi Nejati
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Study of serum bactericidal and splenic activity of Total-OMP- CagA combination from Brucella abortus and Helicobacter pylori in BALB/c mouse model.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Abadi; Mehdi Mahdavi; Azad Khaledi; Seyed-Alireza Esmaeili; Davoud Esmaeili; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Intradermal immunization with outer membrane protein 25 protects Balb/c mice from virulent B. abortus 544.

Authors:  Divya Goel; Rakesh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.407

7.  [A case of human brucellosis caused by accidental injection of animal vaccine].

Authors:  S Squarcione; P Maggi; S Lo Caputo; M De Gennaro; S Carbonara
Journal:  G Ital Med Lav       Date:  1990-01

8.  Antibody response to Brucella outer membrane proteins in bovine brucellosis: immunoblot analysis and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  A Cloeckaert; P Kerkhofs; J N Limet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of a protective protein from stationary-phase exoproteome of Brucella abortus.

Authors:  Shikha Jain; Subodh Kumar; Sudhir Dohre; Prachiti Afley; Nabonita Sengupta; Syed I Alam
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.166

10.  Brucellosis vaccines: assessment of Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide rough mutants defective in core and O-polysaccharide synthesis and export.

Authors:  David González; María-Jesús Grilló; María-Jesús De Miguel; Tara Ali; Vilma Arce-Gorvel; Rose-May Delrue; Raquel Conde-Alvarez; Pilar Muñoz; Ignacio López-Goñi; Maite Iriarte; Clara-M Marín; Andrej Weintraub; Göran Widmalm; Michel Zygmunt; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Jean-Pierre Gorvel; José-María Blasco; Ignacio Moriyón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Bovine brucellosis - a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sandip Kumar Khurana; Anju Sehrawat; Ruchi Tiwari; Minakshi Prasad; Baldev Gulati; Muhammad Zubair Shabbir; Rajesh Chhabra; Kumaragurubaran Karthik; Shailesh Kumar Patel; Mamta Pathak; Mohd Iqbal Yatoo; Vivek Kumar Gupta; Kuldeep Dhama; Ranjit Sah; Wanpen Chaicumpa
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  Preparation and immunological properties of a nanovaccine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on gold nanoparticles and detoxified lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Faezeh Najafzadeh; Asghar Tanomand; Azam Haddadi; Jafar Majidi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Evaluation of the designed multi-epitope protein of Brucella melitensis in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Mina Saadat; Masoud Gandomkar; Akram Bahreinipour; Mojgan Bandehpour; Bahram Kazemi; Nariman Mosaffa
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Evaluation of the Combined Use of Major Outer Membrane Proteins in the Serodiagnosis of Brucellosis.

Authors:  Meixue Yao; Xiaohan Guo; Xiling Wu; Qiongqiong Bai; Mingjun Sun; Dehui Yin
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Evaluation of immune responses to Brucella vaccines in mouse models: A systematic review.

Authors:  Atieh Darbandi; Shabnam Zeighamy Alamdary; Maryam Koupaei; Roya Ghanavati; Mohsen Heidary; Malihe Talebi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.