Literature DB >> 32128014

Professional reports for sentencing courts: recommendations for reporting on child exploitation material offenders' risk of recidivism and prospects for rehabilitation.

Michael J Proeve1, Gabrielle Wolf2.   

Abstract

Denunciation and general deterrence are major objectives of sentencing those who are convicted of possessing or distributing child exploitation material in Australia (CEM offenders), but courts also strive to achieve specific deterrence. To this end, courts tend to rely on professional reports as evidence of risk of reoffending and prospects for rehabilitation. After outlining matters that courts consider when sentencing CEM offenders, we discuss key empirical findings concerning CEM offenders' risk of recidivism, and then evaluate two approaches for assessing this risk: actuarial assessments; and structured professional judgment. We recommend that professional reports prepared for sentencing reflect current research findings regarding risk of recidivism amongst CEM offenders and that the structured professional judgment approach is used. We also recommend that matters which inform offenders' risk of recidivism and their prospects for rehabilitation be reported separately.
© 2019 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actuarial; child exploitation material; child pornography; rehabilitation; risk assessment; structured professional judgment

Year:  2019        PMID: 32128014      PMCID: PMC7033712          DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2019.1642257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law        ISSN: 1321-8719


  15 in total

1.  Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.

Authors:  P E MEEHL; A ROSEN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders.

Authors:  Vivienne de Vogel; Corine de Ruiter; Daan van Beek; Gwen Mead
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2004-06

3.  The psychological profiles of internet, contact, and mixed internet/contact sex offenders.

Authors:  Ian A Elliott; Anthony R Beech; Rebecca Mandeville-Norden
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2012-03-20

Review 4.  Another look at interpreting risk categories.

Authors:  Douglas Mossman
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2006-01

5.  Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by Internet sexual offenders.

Authors:  Helen Catherine Wakeling; Philip Howard; Georgia Barnett
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2011-03

6.  Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT).

Authors:  Michael C Seto; Angela W Eke
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2015-04-06

7.  Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses.

Authors:  Michael C Seto; R Karl Hanson; Kelly M Babchishin
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2010-12-20

8.  Examining the criminal history and future offending of child pornography offenders: an extended prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Angela W Eke; Michael C Seto; Jennette Williams
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2011-12

9.  Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia.

Authors:  Michael C Seto; James M Cantor; Ray Blanchard
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2006-08

10.  Online child pornography offenders are different: a meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children.

Authors:  Kelly M Babchishin; R Karl Hanson; Heather VanZuylen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-03-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Public Perceptions of Child Pornography and Child Pornography Consumers.

Authors:  Chad M S Steel; Emily Newman; Suzanne O'Rourke; Ethel Quayle
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-01-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.