| Literature DB >> 32128012 |
Letizia Caso1, Nicola Palena1, Elga Carlessi1,2, Aldert Vrij3.
Abstract
Research has shown that a comparable truth baseline (CTB) approach elicits more cues to deception and results in higher accuracy rates than a small talk baseline. Past research focused on laypeople's accuracy rates. We examined whether the CTB also has a positive effect on law enforcement personnel accuracy. In this study, 95 police officers judged 10 interviews, whereby half of the senders told the truth, and the other half lied about a mock undercover mission. Half of the interviews included only questioning about the event under investigation, whereas the other half also included questioning aimed at creating a CTB. Total and truth accuracy did not differ, but observers who watched interviews with a CTB obtained higher lie detection accuracy rates than those who watched interviews without the baseline questioning. Signal detection analyses showed that this effect could be attributed to a decreased response bias in the CTB condition.Entities:
Keywords: baseline interviewing; comparable truth baseline; credibility assessment; deception detection; interrogation; interviewing techniques; police officers’ accuracy
Year: 2019 PMID: 32128012 PMCID: PMC7033705 DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2019.1642258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatr Psychol Law ISSN: 1321-8719