| Literature DB >> 32127835 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This is a cross sectional study conducted in order to determine sexual dysfunction in healthy women and risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The population of the study consisted of 282 women. The whole of the population, without sample selection, was included in the study. For data, questionnaire and Female Sexual Function Index-FSFI, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted, were used. Student t and chi-square significant tests and logistic regression analysis were used to carry out statistical analysis.Entities:
Keywords: SD; Turkey; prevalence; risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 32127835 PMCID: PMC7040295 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i3.38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr Health Sci ISSN: 1680-6905 Impact factor: 0.927
Distribution of women's descriptive characteristics
| Characteristics | Mean | sd |
| 14.58 | 10.40 | |
| 2.23 | 0.99 | |
| 1.08 | 0.68 | |
| 72 | 25.5 | |
| 128 | 45.4 | |
| 86 | 30.5 | |
| 114 | 40.4 | |
| 128 | 45.4 | |
| 36 | 12.8 | |
| 190 | 72.5 | |
| 181 | 71.5 | |
| 150 | 53.2 |
Distribution of risk factors to cause sexual dysfunction
| Risk Factors | Number | % |
| 65 | 23 | |
| 75 | 26.6 | |
| 63 | 22.6 | |
| 44 | 15.7 | |
| 20 | 7.1 | |
| 24 | 8.6 | |
| 106 | 37.6 |
Correlation of female sexual dysfunction with descriptive characteristics and logistic regression analysis of risk factors
| Descriptive | Sexual Dysfunction | Significance | OR | |
| Yes | No | |||
| 1,724±1.101 | 2.213±1.106 | t: -3.585 | .105 .498–1.647 | |
| 1.153±,3615 | 1.106±,3103 | t: 1.064 | 304 .332–1.855 | |
| 2.150±1.766 | 2.178±,5549 | t: -155 | 2.724 .961–1.599 | |
| 106 70.7 | 44 29.3 | X2= 11.737 | 2.3371.432–3.815 | |
| 54 42.2 | 74 57.8 | X2= 13.399 | .810 .373–1.760 | |
| 30 34.9 | 56 65.1 | X2= 16.657 | .616 .291–1.306 | |
| 69 60.5 | 45 39.5 | X2= 4.135 | .786 .398–1.549 | |
| 126 51.2 | 120 48,8 | X2= 3.010 | .568 .240–1.347 | |
| 113 59.5 | 77 40.5 | X2= 6.679 | .1.508 .815–2.789 | |
| 85 47.0 | 96 53.0 | X2= 4.979 | 2.608 .277–1.132 | |
Correlation of female sexual dysfunction with risk factors and logistic regression analysis
| Descriptive | Sexual Dysfunction | Significance test | OR | |
| Yes | No | |||
| 18 27.7 | 47 72.3 | X2= 22.059 | .263 .131-.263 | |
| 31 41.3 | 44 58.7 | X2= 5.770 | .766 .457–1.781 | |
| 32 50.8 | 31 49.2 | X2= .187 | 1.255 645–2.439 | |
| 16 36.4 | 28 63.6 | X2= 6.071 | .578 273–1.221 | |
| 6 30.0 | 14 70.0 | X2= 4.650 | .526 .173–1.594 | |
| 16 66.7 | 8 33.3 | X2= 1.913 | 2.589 .952–7.043 | |
| 52 49.1 | 54 50.9 | X2= 1.166 | .832 .485–1.427 | |