Literature DB >> 32127325

High rate of re-bleeding after application of Hemospray for upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeds.

Daljeet Chahal1, Joseph G H Lee2, Nabil Ali-Mohamad3, Fergal Donnellan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hemospray (TC-325, Cook Medical) has recently been approved for use in GI bleeding. Specific clinical indications and predictors of success or failure have not been well delineated.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Hemospray use at a tertiary center. We assessed demographics and characteristics of Hemospray use. We analyzed outcomes of hemostasis, rebleeding, need for embolization or surgery, and death.
RESULTS: 86 applications of Hemospray were identified. The most common etiology of upper GI bleeds were ulcers (67.1%) whilst the etiology of lower GI bleeds varied. Hemospray was applied as monotherapy in 28 procedures (32.6%). Immediate hemostasis rate was 88.4%, but there was a high rate of re-bleeding (33.7%). Most re-bleeds occurred within 7 days (86.2%). Syncope was an independent predictive factor re-bleeding at 7 days for EGD (OR = 12.16, 95% CI = 1.51-97.75, P = 0.019). Bleeding refractory to endoscopic treatment with hemospray required radiological embolization in 9 instances, and surgery in 9 instances. Hemospray therapy was protective against need for embolization (p < 0.05). 2 patients underwent liver transplantation and there was a total of 5 deaths. Hepatic disease was an independent predictor of death (OR = 47.15, 95% CI = 2.42-916.89, P = 0.011).
CONCLUSION: Hemospray is effective in achieving immediate hemostasis but is plagued by high rates of rebleeding. Syncope is a predictor of rebleeding, and hepatic disease is a predictor of death in patients undergoing Hemospray therapy. Despite high rates of embolization and surgery, Hemospray may reduce need for embolization. Hemospray use during endoscopy should prompt physicians to consider early re-look endoscopy and more aggressive therapy.
Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GI bleeding; Hemospray; Hemostatic powders; TC-325

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32127325     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  6 in total

1.  Twitter debate: controversies in management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Carly Lamb; James Maurice; Adrian J Stanley
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-05

2.  Hemostatic efficacy and safety of the hemostatic powder UI-EWD in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Boram Cha; Donghyun Lee; Jongbeom Shin; Jin-Seok Park; Gye-Suk Kwon; Hyungkil Kim
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Hemostasis Techniques for Non-variceal Upper GI Hemorrhage: Beyond Injection and Cautery.

Authors:  B Nulsen; D M Jensen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 4.  Hemostatic powders for gastrointestinal bleeding: a review of old, new, and emerging agents in a rapidly advancing field.

Authors:  Shirley X Jiang; Daljeet Chahal; Nabil Ali-Mohamad; Christian Kastrup; Fergal Donnellan
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-08-15

5.  Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: proposed study outcomes for new randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Dennis M Jensen; Alan Barkun; David Cave; Ian M Gralnek; Rome Jutabha; Loren Laine; James Y W Lau; John R Saltzman; Roy Soetikno; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 9.524

6.  Severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding is halted by endoscopically delivered self-propelling thrombin powder: A porcine pilot study.

Authors:  Nabil Ali-Mohamad; Massimo Cau; James Baylis; Veronika Zenova; Hugh Semple; Andrew Beckett; Andrew McFadden; Fergal Donnellan; Christian Kastrup
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-04-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.