Chen Yao1, Junjie Ning1, Zilun Li1, Mian Wang1, Ridong Wu1, Shenming Wang1, Guangqi Chang2. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, China. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, China. Electronic address: 13922231628@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the parallel covered stents technique in the treatment of anatomically challenging aortic aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, and dissections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from 16 patients with abdominal aortic diseases who were treated with parallel covered stents (Gore Excluder, n = 14; Medtronic Endurant, n = 2) between January 2016 and July 2018. Patients were treated with this technique if they were unsuitable for either open repair or standard endovascular aortic repair with bifurcated stents. Such unfavorable anatomy included narrow aortic necks (≤18 mm), small vascular access (occluded or ≤6.0 mm), or compressed aortic lumens (≤18 mm). All patients were male, with a mean age of 64.7 ± 13.3 years. For true aneurysms (n = 4) and pseudoaneurysms (n = 4), the mean diameter and length of the proximal necks were 17.5 ± 2.6 mm (range, 14-21 mm) and 51.0 ± 12.5 mm (range, 39-75 mm), respectively. The minimal diameter of true lumen in cases with aortic dissection and penetrating ulcers (n = 8) was 14.8 ± 3.1 mm. Small or occluded femoral access was found in 3 patients. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. Minor type I endoleaks, which were seen on completion angiography in 5 patients, had all resolved within 3 months. There were no perioperative deaths. Postoperative complications included supraventricular tachycardia in 1 patient and pneumonia combined with heart failure in 1 patient. Patency of all stents was observed at a mean follow-up of 21.8 ± 10.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The parallel covered stents technique appears to offer a feasible solution for abdominal aortic diseases with unfavorable anatomy. Long-term follow-up is needed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique.
PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the parallel covered stents technique in the treatment of anatomically challenging aortic aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, and dissections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from 16 patients with abdominal aortic diseases who were treated with parallel covered stents (Gore Excluder, n = 14; Medtronic Endurant, n = 2) between January 2016 and July 2018. Patients were treated with this technique if they were unsuitable for either open repair or standard endovascular aortic repair with bifurcated stents. Such unfavorable anatomy included narrow aortic necks (≤18 mm), small vascular access (occluded or ≤6.0 mm), or compressed aortic lumens (≤18 mm). All patients were male, with a mean age of 64.7 ± 13.3 years. For true aneurysms (n = 4) and pseudoaneurysms (n = 4), the mean diameter and length of the proximal necks were 17.5 ± 2.6 mm (range, 14-21 mm) and 51.0 ± 12.5 mm (range, 39-75 mm), respectively. The minimal diameter of true lumen in cases with aortic dissection and penetrating ulcers (n = 8) was 14.8 ± 3.1 mm. Small or occluded femoral access was found in 3 patients. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. Minor type I endoleaks, which were seen on completion angiography in 5 patients, had all resolved within 3 months. There were no perioperative deaths. Postoperative complications included supraventricular tachycardia in 1 patient and pneumonia combined with heart failure in 1 patient. Patency of all stents was observed at a mean follow-up of 21.8 ± 10.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The parallel covered stents technique appears to offer a feasible solution for abdominal aortic diseases with unfavorable anatomy. Long-term follow-up is needed to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique.