| Literature DB >> 32127063 |
Shaohua Gu1, Decheng Li2, Beibei Lu1, Ruixue Huang2, Guozhang Xu1.
Abstract
Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) has high prevalence around the world, with serious consequences for children. Due to the long survival period of HFMD virus in ambient air, air pollutants may play a critical role in HFMD epidemics. We collected data on daily cases of HFMD among children aged 0-14 years in Ningbo City between 2014 and 2016. Distributed lag nonlinear models were used to assess the effects of particulate matter (PM2.5), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) on the daily incidence of HFMD among children, with analyses stratified by gender and age. Compared with moderate levels of air pollution, high SO2 levels had a relative risk (RR) of 2.32 (95% CI 1.42-3.79) and high NO2 levels had a RR of 2.01 (95% CI 1.22-3.31). The RR of O3 was 2.12 (95% CI 1.47-3.05) and that of PM2.5 was 0.77 (95% CI 0.64-0.92) at moderate levels of air pollution. Specifically, high levels of SO2 and NO2 had RRs of 2.39 (95% CI 1.44-3.96) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.21-3.39), respectively, among 0-4-year-old children, while high O3 had an RR of 2.31 (95% CI 1.09-4.89) among 5-14-year-old children. Our findings suggest significant associations of high SO2 and NO2 levels and moderate O3 levels in HFMD epidemics, and also indicate that air pollution causes lagged effects on HFMD epidemics. Our study provides practical and useful data for targeted prevention and control of HMFD based on environmental evidence.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollutants; HFMD
Year: 2020 PMID: 32127063 PMCID: PMC7058833 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268820000321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epidemiol Infect ISSN: 0950-2688 Impact factor: 2.451
Fig. 1.The spatial distribution of environmental monitoring stations in Ningbo city.
Fig. 2.Raw plots showing the temporal trends of HFMD cases in Ningbo city, 2014–2016.
Summary statistics of HFMD, meteorological factors and air pollution in Ningbo city, during 2014–2016
| Groups | Mean | Percentile | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P50 | P99 | |||
| All age | 44.0 | 32.4 | 2.0 | 35.0 | 134.0 |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 26.1 | 19.5 | 0.0 | 21.0 | 80.0 |
| Female | 17.9 | 13.6 | 0.0 | 14.5 | 55.0 |
| Age | |||||
| 0–4 years | 36.5 | 25.9 | 1.0 | 30.0 | 106.0 |
| 5–14 years | 7.5 | 7.4 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 33.1 |
| Environment factors | |||||
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 43.2 | 26.4 | 9.7 | 37.0 | 133.4 |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 41.1 | 17.5 | 12.4 | 38.1 | 89.9 |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 15.2 | 7.8 | 6.6 | 13.1 | 44.6 |
| O3-8 h (μg/m3) | 94.0 | 40.1 | 13.1 | 90.0 | 197.7 |
| Average temperature (°C) | 17.9 | 8.2 | 2.0 | 19.1 | 31.3 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 76.8 | 11.5 | 46.0 | 78.0 | 96.0 |
| Sunshine duration (h) | 4.1 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 11.6 |
Fig. 3.Boxplots of monthly air pollution in Ningbo city, during 2014–2016.
The spearman correlations between different environment factors
| Factors | PM2.5 (μg/m3) | SO2 (μg/m3) | NO2 (μg/m3) | O3-8 h (μg/m3) | Temperature (°C) | Humidity (%) | Sunshine (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | |||||||
| SO2 (μg/m3) | |||||||
| NO2 (μg/m3) | |||||||
| O3-8 h (μg/m3) | 0.026 | 0.046 | |||||
| Temperature (°C) | |||||||
| Humidity (%) | −0.032 | ||||||
| Sunshine (h) | 0.049 |
Note. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) were labelled in bold font.
Fig. 4.Association between air pollution and HFMD cases. Left panels: 3-D graphs of the exposure-lag-response risk surface. Right panels: overall cumulative exposure–response associations.
The overall estimated RR values for air pollutants at different levels with a lag of 14 days
| Moderate level | High level | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 0.77 (0.64–0.92) | 0.71 (0.46–1.09) |
| SO2, | 1.06 (0.87–1.29) | 2.32 (1.42–3.79) |
| NO2 | 0.85 (0.68–1.07) | 2.01 (1.22–3.31) |
| O3-8 h | 2.12 (1.47–3.05) | 1.02 (0.69–1.53) |
Cumulative relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for medium levels of air pollution on HFMD over a lag of 14 days
| Groups | PM2.5 | SO2 | NO2 | O3-8 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All age | 1.06 (0.87–1.29) | 0.85 (0.68–1.07) | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1.05 (0.83–1.33) | 0.84 (0.65–1.10) | ||
| Female | 1.08 (0.83–1.40) | 0.91 (0.68–1.23) | ||
| Age, years | ||||
| 0–4 | 1.02 (0.83–1.26) | 0.85 (0.67–1.08) | ||
| 5–14 | 0.89 (0.62–1.27) | 1.23 (0.83–1.80) | 0.93 (0.60–1.43) |
Note. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) were labelled in bold font. The reference values were the 1st percentiles of each air pollutant. The effects of medium levels of air pollution were estimated by calculating the risk of HFMD at the 50th percentiles of each air pollutants relative to the reference.
Cumulative relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for high levels of air pollution on HFMD over a lag of 14 days
| Groups | PM2.5 | SO2 | NO2 | O3-8 h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All age | 0.71 (0.46–1.09) | 1.02 (0.69–1.53) | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 0.79 (0.47–1.31) | 1.06 (0.66–1.70) | ||
| Female | 0.62 (0.36–1.10) | 1.82 (0.83–1.40) | 1.02 (0.60–1.71) | |
| Age, years | ||||
| 0–4 | 0.73 (0.47–1.15) | 0.88 (0.58–1.33) | ||
| 5–14 | 0.59 (0.26–1.32) | 1.86 (0.71–4.89) | 2.21 (0.85–5.76) |
Note. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) were labelled in bold font. The reference values were the 1st percentiles of each air pollutant. The effects of high levels of air pollution were estimated by calculating the risk of HFMD at the 99th percentiles of each air pollutants relative to the reference.