Literature DB >> 32126888

Precise and accurate power of the rank-sum test for a continuous outcome.

Katie R Mollan1, Ilana M Trumble1, Sarah A Reifeis1, Orlando Ferrer1, Camden P Bay1, Pedro L Baldoni1, Michael G Hudgens1.   

Abstract

Accurate power calculations are essential in small studies containing expensive experimental units or high-stakes exposures. Herein, power of the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney rank-sum test of a continuous outcome is formulated using a Monte Carlo approach and defining [Formula: see text] as a measure of effect size, where [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] denote random observations from two distributions hypothesized to be equal under the null. Effect size [Formula: see text] fosters productive communications because researchers understand [Formula: see text] is analogous to a fair coin toss, and [Formula: see text] near 0 or 1 represents a large effect. This approach is feasible even without background data. Simulations were conducted comparing the empirical power approach to existing approaches by Rosner & Glynn, Shieh and colleagues, Noether, and O'Brien-Castelloe. Approximations by Noether and O'Brien-Castelloe are shown to be inaccurate for small sample sizes. The Rosner & Glynn and Shieh, Jan & Randles approaches performed well in many small sample scenarios, though both are restricted to location-shift alternatives and neither approach is theoretically justified for small samples. The empirical method is recommended and available in the R package wmwpow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mann–Whitney test; Monte Carlo simulation; Wilcoxon rank-sum test; non-parametric; power analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32126888      PMCID: PMC7316590          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1730866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  13 in total

1.  Size and power estimation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for ordered categorical data.

Authors:  Yongqiang Tang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sample size calculation for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test adjusting for ties.

Authors:  Yan D Zhao; Dewi Rahardja; Yongming Qu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Power and sample size estimation for the Wilcoxon rank sum test with application to comparisons of C statistics from alternative prediction models.

Authors:  B Rosner; R J Glynn
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Statistical grand rounds: a review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests.

Authors:  George Divine; H James Norton; Ronald Hunt; Jacqueline Dienemann
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  HIV-1 expression within resting CD4+ T cells after multiple doses of vorinostat.

Authors:  Nancy M Archin; Rosalie Bateson; Manoj K Tripathy; Amanda M Crooks; Kuo-Hsiung Yang; Noelle P Dahl; Mary F Kearney; Elizabeth M Anderson; John M Coffin; Matthew C Strain; Douglas D Richman; Kevin R Robertson; Angela D Kashuba; Ronald J Bosch; Daria J Hazuda; Joann D Kuruc; Joseph J Eron; David M Margolis
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Estimating the power of the two-sample Wilcoxon test for location shift.

Authors:  B J Collings; M A Hamilton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A comparison of size and power calculations for the Wilcoxon statistic for ordered categorical data.

Authors:  J E Kolassa
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Power and sample size calculations for exact conditional tests with ordered categorical data.

Authors:  J F Hilton; C R Mehta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Exemplary data set sample size calculation for Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.

Authors:  George Divine; Alissa Kapke; Suzanne Havstad; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Defective human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD8+ T-cell polyfunctionality, proliferation, and cytotoxicity are not restored by antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Stephen A Migueles; Kristin A Weeks; Eric Nou; Amy M Berkley; Julia E Rood; Christine M Osborne; Claire W Hallahan; Nancy A Cogliano-Shutta; Julia A Metcalf; Mary McLaughlin; Richard Kwan; JoAnn M Mican; Richard T Davey; Mark Connors
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  5 in total

1.  False memories formation is increased in individuals with insomnia.

Authors:  Serena Malloggi; Francesca Conte; Oreste De Rosa; Stefania Righi; Giorgio Gronchi; Gianluca Ficca; Fiorenza Giganti
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.296

2.  Computational analyses reveal spatial relationships between nuclear pore complexes and specific lamins.

Authors:  Mark Kittisopikul; Takeshi Shimi; Meltem Tatli; Joseph Riley Tran; Yixian Zheng; Ohad Medalia; Khuloud Jaqaman; Stephen A Adam; Robert D Goldman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 10.539

3.  Efficacy of personal pharmacogenomic testing as an educational tool in the pharmacy curriculum: A nonblinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chloe Grace; Marti M Larriva; Heidi E Steiner; Srujitha Marupuru; Patrick J Campbell; Hayley Patterson; Cheryl D Cropp; Dorothy Quinn; Walter Klimecki; David E Nix; Terri Warholak; Jason H Karnes
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  linc-20 and linc-9 do not have compensatory fertility roles in C. elegans.

Authors:  Yisrael Rappaport; Roni Falk; Hanna Achache; Yonatan B Tzur
Journal:  MicroPubl Biol       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Analysis and Allocation of Cancer-Related Genes Using Vague DNA Sequence Data.

Authors:  Muhammad Aslam; Mohammed Albassam
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.772

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.