Zarqa Ali1, John Robert Zibert2, Simon Francis Thomsen3,4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, zarqa_ali@hotmail.com. 2. LEO Innovation Lab, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cost of developing a new drug is approximately USD 2.6 billion, and over two-thirds of the total cost is embedded in the clinical-testing phase. Patient recruitment is the single biggest cause of clinical trial delays, and these delays can result in up to USD 8 million per day in lost revenue for pharmaceutical companies. Further, clinical trials struggle to keep participants engaged in the study and as many as 40% drop out. To overcome these challenges pharmaceutical companies and research institutions (e.g., universities) increasingly use an emerging concept: virtual clinical trials (VCT) based on a remote approach. SUMMARY: VCT (site-less) are a relatively new method of conducting a clinical trial, taking full advantage of technology (apps, monitoring devices, etc.) and inclusion of web platforms (recruitment, informed consent, counselling, measurement of endpoints, and any adverse reactions) to allow the patient to be home-based at every stage of the clinical trial. Studies have shown that VCT are not only operationally feasible, but also successful. They have higher recruitment rates, better compliance, lower drop-out rates, and are conducted faster than traditional clinical trials. The visual nature of dermatological conditions, the relative ease in evaluating skin diseases virtually, and the fact that skin diseases often are not life-threatening and rarely require complex examinations make VCT very attractive for dermatological research. Further, making correct diagnoses based on photographs and patient symptomatology has always been part of the dermatologist's routine. Thus, VCT are in many ways made for dermatology. Herein we describe VCT and their implications in dermatological research.
BACKGROUND: The cost of developing a new drug is approximately USD 2.6 billion, and over two-thirds of the total cost is embedded in the clinical-testing phase. Patient recruitment is the single biggest cause of clinical trial delays, and these delays can result in up to USD 8 million per day in lost revenue for pharmaceutical companies. Further, clinical trials struggle to keep participants engaged in the study and as many as 40% drop out. To overcome these challenges pharmaceutical companies and research institutions (e.g., universities) increasingly use an emerging concept: virtual clinical trials (VCT) based on a remote approach. SUMMARY: VCT (site-less) are a relatively new method of conducting a clinical trial, taking full advantage of technology (apps, monitoring devices, etc.) and inclusion of web platforms (recruitment, informed consent, counselling, measurement of endpoints, and any adverse reactions) to allow the patient to be home-based at every stage of the clinical trial. Studies have shown that VCT are not only operationally feasible, but also successful. They have higher recruitment rates, better compliance, lower drop-out rates, and are conducted faster than traditional clinical trials. The visual nature of dermatological conditions, the relative ease in evaluating skin diseases virtually, and the fact that skin diseases often are not life-threatening and rarely require complex examinations make VCT very attractive for dermatological research. Further, making correct diagnoses based on photographs and patient symptomatology has always been part of the dermatologist's routine. Thus, VCT are in many ways made for dermatology. Herein we describe VCT and their implications in dermatological research.
Authors: Begoña de Las Heras; Adam Daehnke; Kamal S Saini; Melissa Harris; Kenneth Morrison; Ariel Aguilo; Isagani Chico; Laura Vidal; Robin Marcus Journal: Digit Health Date: 2022-05-25
Authors: Carmen Rosa; Lisa A Marsch; Erin L Winstanley; Meg Brunner; Aimee N C Campbell Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Rachel L Randell; Lindsay Singler; Anthony Cunningham; Laura E Schanberg; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Christoph P Hornik; Stephen J Balevic Journal: Lupus Sci Med Date: 2021-05
Authors: Dorra Bouazzi; Anette Bygum; Lone Skov; Mikkel Lindskov Sachs; Lars Iversen; Merete Hædersdal; Gregor B E Jemec; Simon F Thomsen Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Debra Nana Yeboa; Chidinma Anakwenze Akinfenwa; Jonathan Nguyen; Diana Amaya; Beth de Gracia; Matthew Ning; Victoria Cox; Brian De; Benjamin D Smith; Lili Lin; Sam Beddar; Hanh Hoang; Albert Koong; Zhongxing Liao Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-03-03
Authors: Ryan Geist; Michelle Militello; J Mark Albrecht; Colby L Presley; Jaclyn B Anderson; Melissa Laughter; Chandler W Rundle Journal: Curr Dermatol Rep Date: 2021-11-19
Authors: Kamal S Saini; Begoña de Las Heras; Ruth Plummer; Victor Moreno; Marco Romano; Javier de Castro; Philippe Aftimos; Judy Fredriksson; Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya; Martin Sebastian Olivo; Gaia Schiavon; Kevin Punie; Jesus Garcia-Foncillas; Ernesto Rogata; Richie Pfeiffer; Cecilia Orbegoso; Kenneth Morrison; Giuseppe Curigliano; Lynda Chin; Monika Lamba Saini; Øystein Rekdal; Steven Anderson; Javier Cortes; Manuela Leone; Janet Dancey; Chris Twelves; Ahmad Awada Journal: JCO Glob Oncol Date: 2020-09
Authors: Romée Melanie Helena Coert; James Kenneth Timmis; André Boorsma; Wilrike J Pasman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 5.428