| Literature DB >> 32126403 |
Siobhán Atkinson1, Michael Bruen2, John J O' Sullivan2, Jonathan N Turner3, Bernard Ball4, Jens Carlsson4, Craig Bullock5, Colm M Casserly6, Mary Kelly-Quinn7.
Abstract
Knowledge of the location, physical attributes and impacts of obstacles on river connectivity is a requirement for any mitigating action aimed at restoring the connectivity of a river system. Here, we present a study that recorded the numbers and physical diversity of obstacles in 10 river catchments in Ireland, together with the impact these structures had on overall river connectivity. A total of 372 obstacles were recorded, 3 of these were dams, and the remainder were low-head weirs/sluices, obstacles associated with road or rail crossings of rivers and natural structures. The degree of fragmentation was estimated in each catchment by calculating obstacle density and the Dendritic Connectivity Index (DCI). DCI scores were calculated for 4 native Irish fish species with different life-histories, namely diadromous (Atlantic salmon, sea trout, European eel, sea lamprey) and potamodromous (brown trout). Obstacle density ranged between 1.2 and 0.02 obstacles/km of river. Six of the 10 catchments had at least one obstacle located on the mainstem river at least 5 km from its mouth/confluence. These 6 catchments typically had the lowest connectivity scores for diadromous species and ranged between 0.6 and 44.1 (a fully connected river would receive a maximum score of 100). While there was no significant correlation between obstacle density and the DCI score for diadromous fish, a significant negative correlation was detected between obstacle density and the DCI score for potamodromous brown trout. Here, we highlight the merit of these obstacle assessments and associated challenges for decision-making relating to prioritisation of obstacles for removal or modification.Entities:
Keywords: Barrier; Connectivity; Diadromous; Fish migration; Inventory; Ireland; Physical survey; Potamodromous
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32126403 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963