Stefano Forlivesi1, Manuel Cappellari2, Bruno Bonetti2. 1. Neurology Unit, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via don A. Sempreboni, 5, 37024, Negrar, Verona, Italy. forlivesi.sf@gmail.com. 2. Stroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite obesity is an established risk factor for stroke, several studies reported a better outcome after stroke in obese and overweight patients. This counterintuitive finding, which was described in the whole spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, is known as obesity paradox. OBJECTIVE: This is a narrative overview on the obesity paradox and stroke. METHODS: We used as sources MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to 2019, and selected papers that discussed the association of obesity with outcome and mortality after stroke. RESULTS: The majority of studies reported lower mortality rates and better functional outcome after stroke in obese and overweight patients compared with normal weight and underweight patients, suggesting the existence of an obesity paradox in stroke. However, available studies are limited by several major methodological concerns including absence of randomized trials, retrospective nature of most studies, assessment of obesity with body mass index (BMI), non-linear relationship between BMI and outcome, short follow-up period, and differences in co-morbid conditions and stroke characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of an obesity paradox in stroke is still controversial and further higher quality evidence is needed to clarify the relationship between obesity and stroke outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, narrative review.
BACKGROUND: Despite obesity is an established risk factor for stroke, several studies reported a better outcome after stroke in obese and overweight patients. This counterintuitive finding, which was described in the whole spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, is known as obesity paradox. OBJECTIVE: This is a narrative overview on the obesity paradox and stroke. METHODS: We used as sources MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to 2019, and selected papers that discussed the association of obesity with outcome and mortality after stroke. RESULTS: The majority of studies reported lower mortality rates and better functional outcome after stroke in obese and overweight patients compared with normal weight and underweight patients, suggesting the existence of an obesity paradox in stroke. However, available studies are limited by several major methodological concerns including absence of randomized trials, retrospective nature of most studies, assessment of obesity with body mass index (BMI), non-linear relationship between BMI and outcome, short follow-up period, and differences in co-morbid conditions and stroke characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of an obesity paradox in stroke is still controversial and further higher quality evidence is needed to clarify the relationship between obesity and stroke outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, narrative review.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body mass index (BMI); Obesity; Obesity paradox; Stroke
Authors: Luis Gruberg; Neil J Weissman; Ron Waksman; Shmuel Fuchs; Regina Deible; Ellen E Pinnow; Lanja M Ahmed; Kenneth M Kent; Augusto D Pichard; William O Suddath; Lowell F Satler; Joseph Lindsay Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-02-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Heinz J Buettner; Christian Mueller; Michael Gick; Marek Ferenc; Juergen Allgeier; Thomas Comberg; Klaus D Werner; Christian Schindler; Franz-Josef Neumann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Tom Skyhøj Olsen; Christian Dehlendorff; Hans Gregers Petersen; Klaus Kaae Andersen Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-29 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Shilpa Bhupathiraju; David Wormser; Pei Gao; Stephen Kaptoge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Benjamin Cairns; Rachel Huxley; Chandra Jackson; Grace Joshy; Sarah Lewington; JoAnn Manson; Neil Murphy; Alpa Patel; Jonathan Samet; Mark Woodward; Wei Zheng; Maigen Zhou; Narinder Bansal; Aurelio Barricarte; Brian Carter; James Cerhan; George Smith; Xianghua Fang; Oscar Franco; Jane Green; Jim Halsey; Janet Hildebrand; Keum Jung; Rosemary Korda; Dale McLerran; Steven Moore; Linda O'Keeffe; Ellie Paige; Anna Ramond; Gillian Reeves; Betsy Rolland; Carlotta Sacerdote; Naveed Sattar; Eleni Sofianopoulou; June Stevens; Michael Thun; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Ling Yang; Young Yun; Peter Willeit; Emily Banks; Valerie Beral; Zhengming Chen; Susan Gapstur; Marc Gunter; Patricia Hartge; Sun Jee; Tai-Hing Lam; Richard Peto; John Potter; Walter Willett; Simon Thompson; John Danesh; Frank Hu Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 79.321