Literature DB >> 32124002

The leading role of pathology in assessing the somatic molecular alterations of cancer: Position Paper of the European Society of Pathology.

Xavier Matias-Guiu1, Giorgio Stanta2, Fátima Carneiro3, Ales Ryska4, Gerald Hoefler5, Holger Moch6.   

Abstract

Molecular pathology is an essential part of pathology complementing conventional morphological tools to obtain a correct integrated diagnosis with appropriate assessment of prognosis and prediction of response to therapy, particularly in cancer. There is a concern about the situation of molecular pathology in some areas of Europe, namely, regarding the central role of pathologists in assessing somatic genomic alterations in cancer. In some countries, there are attempts that other laboratory medicine specialists perform the molecular analysis of somatic alterations in cancer, particularly now when next generation sequencing (NGS) is incorporated into clinical practice. In this scenario, pathologists may play just the role of "tissue providers," and other specialists may take the lead in molecular analysis. Geneticists and laboratory medicine specialists have all background and skills to perform genetic analysis of germline alterations in hereditary disorders, including familial forms of cancers. However, interpretation of somatic alterations of cancer belongs to the specific scientific domain of pathology. Pathologists are necessary to guarantee the quality of the results, for several reasons: (1) The identified molecular alterations should be interpreted in the appropriate morphologic context, since most of them are context-specific; (2) pre-analytical issues must be taken into consideration; (3) it is crucial to check the proportion of tumor cells in the sample subjected to analysis and presence of inflammatory infiltrate and necrosis should be monitored; and 4) the role of pathologists is crucial to select the most appropriate methods and to control the turnaround time in which the molecular results are delivered in the context of an integrated diagnosis. Obviously, there is the possibility of having core facilities for NGS in a hospital to perform the sequence analysis that are open to other specialties (microbiologists, geneticists), but also in this scenario, pathologists should have the lead in assessing somatic alterations of cancer. In this article, we emphasize the importance of interpreting somatic molecular alterations of the tumors in the context of morphology. In this Position Paper of the European Society of Pathology, we strongly support a central role of pathology departments in the process of analysis and interpretation of somatic molecular alterations in cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Integrative pathology; Molecular pathology; Pathology; Pre-analytical issues

Year:  2020        PMID: 32124002     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-020-02757-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  6 in total

1.  The Porto European Cancer Research Summit 2021.

Authors:  Ulrik Ringborg; Anton Berns; Julio E Celis; Manuel Heitor; Josep Tabernero; Joachim Schüz; Michael Baumann; Rui Henrique; Matti Aapro; Partha Basu; Regina Beets-Tan; Benjamin Besse; Fátima Cardoso; Fátima Carneiro; Guy van den Eede; Alexander Eggermont; Stefan Fröhling; Susan Galbraith; Elena Garralda; Douglas Hanahan; Thomas Hofmarcher; Bengt Jönsson; Olli Kallioniemi; Miklós Kásler; Eva Kondorosi; Jan Korbel; Denis Lacombe; José Carlos Machado; José M Martin-Moreno; Francoise Meunier; Péter Nagy; Paolo Nuciforo; Simon Oberst; Júlio Oliveiera; Maria Papatriantafyllou; Walter Ricciardi; Alexander Roediger; Bettina Ryll; Richard Schilsky; Grazia Scocca; Raquel Seruca; Marta Soares; Karen Steindorf; Vincenzo Valentini; Emile Voest; Elisabete Weiderpass; Nils Wilking; Amanda Wren; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Biomarker characterization in endometrial cancer in Italy: first survey data analysis.

Authors:  Gian Franco Zannoni; Angela Santoro; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Frediano Inzani; Giuseppe Angelico; Emma Bragantini; Alessia Piermattei; Federica Cianfrini; Brigitte Bisaro; Matteo Fassan
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2022-06

Review 3.  Endocervical Adenocarcinoma, Gross Examination, and Processing, Including Intraoperative Evaluation: Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

Authors:  Carlos Parra-Herran; Anais Malpica; Esther Oliva; Gian Franco Zannoni; Pedro T Ramirez; Joseph T Rabban
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 4.  Expert opinion on NSCLC small specimen biomarker testing - Part 1: Tissue collection and management.

Authors:  Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Keith M Kerr; Pilar Garrido; Erik Thunnissen; Elisabeth Dequeker; Nicola Normanno; Simon J Patton; Jenni Fairley; Joshua Kapp; Daniëlle de Ridder; Aleš Ryška; Holger Moch
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.535

5.  Genetic alterations associated with multiple primary malignancies.

Authors:  Jenny Nyqvist; Anikó Kovács; Zakaria Einbeigi; Per Karlsson; Eva Forssell-Aronsson; Khalil Helou; Toshima Z Parris
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 6.  Impact of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on Decision-Making in Precision Medicine for Pancreatic Cancer: Beyond Diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Mitsuhito Sasaki; Yusuke Hashimoto; Kazuo Watanabe; Shoichi Miyazawa; Taro Shibuki; Shuichi Mitsunaga; Masafumi Ikeda
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.