Literature DB >> 32123911

Updating the Burn Center Referral Criteria: Results From the 2018 eDelphi Consensus Study.

Amanda P Bettencourt1, Kathleen S Romanowski2, Victor Joe3, James Jeng4, Jeffrey E Carter5, Robert Cartotto6, Christopher K Craig7, Renata Fabia8, Gary A Vercruysse9, William L Hickerson10, Yuk Liu11, Colleen M Ryan12,13, John T Schulz11,14.   

Abstract

Existing burn center referral criteria were developed several years ago, and subsequent innovations in burn care have occurred. Coupled with frequent errors in the estimation of extent of burn injury and depth by referring providers, patients are both over and under-triaged when the existing criteria are used to support patient care decisions. In the absence of compelling clinical trial data on appropriate burn patient triage, we convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to execute an iterative eDelphi consensus process to facilitate a revision. The eDelphi process panel consisted of n = 61 burn stakeholders and experts and progressed through four rounds before reaching consensus on key clinical domains. The major findings are that 1) burn center consultation is strongly recommended for all patients with deep partial-thickness or deeper burns ≥ 10% TBSA burned, for full-thickness burns ≥ 5% TBSA burned, for children and older adults with specific dressing and medical needs, and for special burn circumstances including electrical, chemical, and radiation injuries; 2) smaller burns are ideally followed in burn center outpatient settings as soon as possible after injury, preferably without delays of a week or more; 3) frostbite, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/TENS, and necrotizing soft-tissue infection patients benefit from burn center treatment; and 4) telemedicine and technological solutions are of likely benefit in achieving this standard. Unlike the original criteria, the revised consensus-based guidelines create a framework promoting communication so that triage and treatment are specifically tailored to individual patient characteristics, injury severity, geography, and the capabilities of referring institutions.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32123911      PMCID: PMC7510842          DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of Burn Rounds Using Telemedicine: Perspectives from Patients, Families, and Burn Center Staff.

Authors:  Haig A Yenikomshian; Tara L Lerew; Melvin Tam; Sam P Mandell; Shari E Honari; Tam N Pham
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 2.  Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Saskia Jünger; Sheila A Payne; Jenny Brine; Lukas Radbruch; Sarah G Brearley
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 3.  Changing the Way We Think About Burn Size Estimation.

Authors:  Christopher Pham; Zachary Collier; Justin Gillenwater
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  Effects of differences in percent total body surface area estimation on fluid resuscitation of transferred burn patients.

Authors:  Carter Freiburg; Peter Igneri; Kennith Sartorelli; Frederick Rogers
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Quantitative Analysis of Estimated Burn Size Accuracy for Transfer Patients.

Authors:  Joseph Robert Armstrong; Luke Willand; Beverly Gonzalez; Jasmin Sandhu; Michael J Mosier
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  Relationship between multidisciplinary critical care and burn patients survival: A propensity-matched national cohort analysis.

Authors:  Thet Su Win; Metin Nizamoglu; Ritesh Maharaj; Sarah Smailes; Naguib El-Muttardi; Peter Dziewulski
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.744

7.  Optimization of burn referrals.

Authors:  Hanna K Reiband; Kira Lundin; Bjarne Alsbjørn; Anne Marie Sørensen; Lars S Rasmussen
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.744

8.  Inter-facility transfer of pediatric burn patients from U.S. Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Junxin Shi; Jonathan I Groner; Rajan K Thakkar; Renata Fabia; Gail E Besner; Huiyun Xiang; Krista K Wheeler
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Adherence to burn center referral criteria: are patients appropriately being referred?

Authors:  Jeffrey E Carter; Lucas P Neff; James H Holmes
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

10.  Assessment of Outreach by a Regional Burn Center: Could Referral Criteria Revision Help with Utilization of Resources?

Authors:  Nicholas H Carter; Clint Leonard; Lisa Rae
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.845

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical decision-support for acute burn referral and triage at specialized centres - Contribution from routine and digital health tools.

Authors:  Constance Boissin
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 2.996

2.  Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Guide for Nurses.

Authors:  Leah M Hanson; Amanda P Bettencourt
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  A 1% TBSA Chart Reduces Math Errors While Retaining Acceptable First-Estimate Accuracy.

Authors:  William C Ray; Adrian Rajab; Hope Alexander; Brianna Chmil; Robert Wolfgang Rumpf; Rajan Thakkar; Madhubalan Viswanathan; Renata Fabia
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 1.819

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.