Sedigheh Bakhtiari1,2, Fatemeh Nematzade3, Mojdeh Hakemi-Vala4, Ghazaleh Talebi4,5. 1. Preventative Dental Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Private Practice, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Fungal diseases had been rarely the cause of death in the past, but nowadays, due to the increase of immunocompromised patients, they have become a major life-threatening factor [1,2].There are about 300 microorganism species in the oral cavity, 20 of which are Candida species. Among them, Candida albicans (C. albicans) is the most common type that can cause local or systemic infection, which if not treated, it can be the cause of mortality in patients [1-4].Candida glabrata (C. glabrata) is the most common type of non-albicans Candida in neutropenic patients, which is often resistant to fluconazole [2]. Biofilm formation in urinary catheters, dental devices, and prostheses is another feature of the pathogenicity of this fungus [2]. Candida krusei (C. krusei) is a nosocomial agent primarily found in patients with immune deficiency and leukemia [5]. Mortality rates by non-albicans species have been reported to be ranging from 35% to 65% [4]. The lowest mortality rate has been associated with Candida parapsilosis (C. parapsilosis), whereas the highest rate has been associated with Candida tropicalis (C. tropicalis) and C. glabrata (40–70%). Other species, such as C. krusei, have an overall mortality rate similar to that of C. albicans (20–40%) [4]. Most fungal infections are treated with antifungal agents such as nystatin, amphotericin B, and azole compounds with complications such as the bad taste of nystatin, renal and hepatic toxicity with amphotericin B, and different effects of teratogens in the azole group [6].Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic coccus that is another member of the human oral cavity microbiota. These bacteria are the most important cause of tooth decay. So far, many substances have been recommended to combat these bacteria, among them, chlorhexidine mouthwashes have shown the highest efficacy; however, long-term use of this mouthwash causes complications in the mouth [7-11].Boswellia serrata (B. serrata) belongs to the Burseraceae family and Spindales order. The other name of this plant in English is Frankincense [11]. B. serrata has anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenesis, anti-apoptosis, anti-tumor, anti-cancer, and anti-oxidant properties and regulates the immune system [12-22]. Oral prescription of this plant during breast-feeding increases the baby’s memory power [23]. According to previous studies, B. serrata improves shortness of breath, bronchitis, and asthma attacks [24-28]. In addition, it has an anti-ulcer effect on the gastrointestinal system and it can lower blood sugar [24-28]. Due to the presence of acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA) in B. serrata, it has an anti-bacterial effect on oral pathogens and prevents bacterial biofilm formation [29,30]. This substance is used as a decay reducer agent in chewing gums [31]. The effects of this substance on some bacteria and fungi have been examined in different studies but its effect on S. mutans and Candida species, which are the most common oral microorganisms, has not been evaluated [32-36].In a study by Schillaci et al [30], B. serrata essential oil prevented C. albicans, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) biofilm formation [30]. Camarda et al [35] analyzed the antimicrobial effect of B. serrata essential oil on C. tropicalis and C. albicans and some Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Their results showed the antifungal effect of B. serrata with no antibacterial effect on tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [35]. In contrast, in a study by Hasson et al [36], none of the organic and alcoholic extracts of B. serrata had efficacy against C. albicans. Therefore, performing more experiments on the effect of B. serrata on different types of Candida species is necessary.In this study, the inhibitory effect of organic and hydro-alcoholic extracts of the Iranian B. serrata plant, which can dissolve both polar and non-polar substances, was evaluated against C. albicans, C. krusei, C. glabrata, and S. mutans, as different members of the normal flora of the oral cavity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
B. serrata resin was prepared from Iran’s pharmaceuticals market and scientifically identified at the Faculty of Pharmacy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Preparation of B. serrata organic extract:
Soaking method in an organic solvent was used for extraction. For this purpose, 100 g of B. serrata powder was weighed accurately on a digital balance (GF300, Tokyo, Japan) in the pharmacognosy laboratory. Then, 2000 ml of propylene glycol was added as a solvent to an Erlenmeyer flask. The Erlenmeyer flask was completely covered with a piece of aluminum sheet and placed for 10 days in the dark. The flask was incubated for 24 hours on a shaker (Heidolph Unimax 2010, Schwabach, Germany) operating at 90 revolutions per minute (rpm). The solutions were purified using filter papers and Buchner funnel. To dry the extract, the purified solution was placed in a crystallizer container closed with a piece of porous aluminum sheet and kept at room temperature to dry.
Preparation of hydro-alcoholic extract of B. serrata:
For hydro-alcoholic extraction, a specified volume of B. serrata was weighed as described previously, and a certain volume of 96% hydro-alcoholic solvent was added to it. The resultant solutions were then placed on the shaker with low intensity for 48 hours. The solution was purified using Buchner funnel and dried. To eliminate the antibacterial effect of alcohol, the hydro-alcoholic extract container was left open for alcohol evaporation.
Microbial strains:
Standard microbial strains used in this study include C. krusei [Persian Type Culture Collection (PTCC) 5297], C. albicans (PTCC 5027), C. glabrata (PTCC 5295), and S. mutans (PTCC 1688), which were purchased from the Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST).
Micro-dilution method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC):
At first, S. mutans and Candida species were cultured on blood agar and Müller-Hinton agar media, respectively, to achieve fresh colonies. According to the CLSI, fungal and bacterial suspensions were prepared with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland’s turbidity [1.5×108 colony-forming units (CFUs)/ml]. The optical density (OD) of 0.5 McFarland’s suspension at a 625-nm wavelength was 0.08–0.1 [37]. Eight dilution series (200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 2.125, and 1.56 mg/ml) were prepared. To provide these dilutions, eight capped sterile microplates, which contained 100 μl of Müller-Hinton broth, were prepared. Then, the organic extract of B. serrata was diluted using 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Cenavisa Co., Reus, Spain) solution to 200 mg/ml, and 100 μl of this concentration was added to the first well, and serial dilutions were prepared. Then, 10 μl of fungal and bacterial suspensions (1:20 dilutions) was added based on the CLSI protocol. The microplates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. The first clear well with no turbidity was considered as the MIC.This experiment was repeated three times, and four microplates were considered for the four microorganism species. Overall, twelve microplates were used for three Candida species and S. mutans. The contents of the well with no growth were cultured on Müller-Hinton agar, and after 24 hours of incubation, the lowest concentration with no growth was considered as the minimum bactericidal (MBC) or minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC).
Preparation of nystatin and chlorhexidine dilution series as a control:
Working concentration of nystatin readymade solution (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: N-3503) was prepared based on the manufacturer’s protocol and using 5 mg/ml DMSO to make a clear yellow solution [37]. Final 50 mg/ml stock suspension in water was prepared and stored at −20°C. The primary concentration of chlorhexidine was 0.2%. Serial dilutions of 0.2% chlorhexidine solution and nystatin were prepared using the same method previously described. The statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS
In this study, the inhibitory effects of organic and hydro-alcoholic extracts of B. serrata on Candida species and S. mutans were analyzed in comparison with nystatin and chlorhexidine. The hydro-alcoholic extract of B. serrata at the 50 mg/ml concentration was able to inhibit C. albicans and S. mutans. In addition, at the 100 mg/ml concentration, the growth of C. krusei and C. glabrata were inhibited (Table 1). At the 200 mg/ml concentration, the organic extract of B. serrata only inhibited C. glabrata (Table 1; Fig. 1).
Table 1:
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal (MBC) and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFC) of hydro-alcoholic extract (HAE) and organic extract (OE) of Boswellia serrata (B. serrata) against the studied species
HAE & OE of B. serrata (mg/ml)
C. albicans
C. krusei
C. glabrata
S. mutans
MIC (HAE)
50
100
100
50
MBC & MFC (HAE)
100
200
200
100
MIC (OE)
NE
200
NE
NE
MBC & MFC (OE)
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE: No Effect
Fig. 1:
Comparison of the effects of hydro-alcoholic and organic extracts (mg/ml) of Boswellia serrata (B. serrata) on the studied species
Comparison of the effects of hydro-alcoholic and organic extracts (mg/ml) of Boswellia serrata (B. serrata) on the studied speciesMinimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal (MBC) and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFC) of hydro-alcoholic extract (HAE) and organic extract (OE) of Boswellia serrata (B. serrata) against the studied speciesNE: No EffectAt a 0.06 mg/ml concentration, nystatin inhibited the growth of C. glabrata and C. krusei. At the 0.03 mg/ml concentration, it inhibited the growth of C. albicans (Table 2).
Table 2:
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of nystatin against the Candida species
Nystatin (mg/ml)
C. albicans
C. krusei
C. glabrata
MIC
0.03
0.06
0.06
MFC
0.06
0.12
0.12
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of nystatin against the Candida speciesChlorhexidine was able to inhibit the growth of S. mutans at a concentration of 0.003 mg/ml with a MIC and MBC of 0.003 and 0.006 mg/ml, respectively. However, it is routinely used as a 0.2% solution. The MICs of the organic extract of B. serrata compared to nystatin against the four strains were significantly different. The hydro-alcoholic extract of B. serrata showed a significant correlation with MIC reduction (P<0.05) but the organic extract did not show such correlation (P>0.05), except for C. glabrata.
DISCUSSION
Candida is one of the common causes of infection, decreasing patients’ quality of life. The emergence of Candida species resistant to common antifungal agents has been observed over the recent years, indicating the necessity of replacing alternative drugs. Due to the acceptable effects of herbal remedies and their fewer complications, they can be an adequate choice for replacing the commonly used chemical drugs [3].In the current study, the inhibitory effects of hydro-alcoholic and organic extracts of B. serrata, nystatin, and chlorhexidine against Candida species and S. mutans was evaluated using the micro-dilution method. Based on the results, nystatin and chlorhexidine showed higher inhibitory effects on Candida species and S. mutans compared to different extracts of B. serrata, which is probably due to the use of pure nystatin and chlorhexidine in comparison with B. serrata impure extracts.If B. serrata is fractionated and the effective ingredient is determined, a more precise comparison can be made with nystatin and chlorhexidine in future studies.The higher inhibitory effect of the hydro-alcoholic extract in comparison with organic extract of B. serrata can be attributed to its strong solubility [38]. Similarly, in the study by Hasson et al [36], the alcoholic extract was more effective than aqueous extract of B. serrata.In a study by Raja et al [29], the antibacterial effect of B. serrata extract on oral cavity pathogens, such as S. mutans and Actinomyces, was analyzed. They showed that the alcoholic extract of B. serrata with the MIC of 2–4 μg/ml effectively reduced the growth of these bacteria [29]. Camarda et al [35] analyzed the effect of B. serrata essential oil on Gram-positive (S. aureus and S. epidermidis) and Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacteria as well as C. tropicalis and C. albicans. They showed that B. serrata essential oil with the MIC of 2.65–12.8 μg/ml effectively reduced the growth of C. albicans and C. tropicalis despite no inhibitory effects on the tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [35].Such a difference between the results of the current study and the cited study may be related to differences between the essential oil and the extract. Essential oils are more concentrated and rich than organic and hydro-alcoholic extracts [38]. Therefore, the higher MIC of organic and hydro-alcoholic herbal extracts, in comparison with essential oils, is justifiable. In addition, it must be noted that different climatic conditions, soil diversity, and harvest season may affect the amount of the effective ingredient of B. serrata in different regions of Iran and other parts of the world. In addition, differences in the evaluation methods and the age of the microbial culture may affect the MIC [37].Sabra and Al-Masoudi [31] evaluated the effectiveness of B. serrata extracts in chewing gum on oral bacteria. The results of the mentioned study showed that after 1–5 hours of chewing gum with B. serrata extract, a significant reduction of such bacteria was detected. Consequently, the use of B. serrata extracts in chewing gum to reduce microbial concentration in the mouth is more effective than other medicines available in the market [31].B. serrata has no toxic effect on human health and only a dose of more than 1 g/kg of it has shown toxicity in animal experiments [39]. Because of the low toxicity, there are probably no serious side effects in case of sudden swallowing of the mouthwash by children or disabled individuals [11-39].The results of the current study, as well as the above-mentioned studies, show a new horizon to produce new effective products of B. serrata to combat the oral pathogenic microbes.
CONCLUSION
According to the results of the present study, hydro-alcoholic extract of B. serrata is more effective against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and S. mutans in comparison with the organic extract. Hydro-alcoholic extract of B. serrata was most effective against C. albicans and S. mutans. To achieve definitive results, fractionation of B. serrata extract is recommended to find the effective ingredient.
Authors: Takashi Fukuoka; Douglas A Johnston; Carol A Winslow; Marcel J de Groot; Catherine Burt; Christopher A Hitchcock; Scott G Filler Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Alsaba F Raja; Furqan Ali; Inshad A Khan; Abdul S Shawl; Daljit S Arora; Bhahwal A Shah; Subhash C Taneja Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 3.605
Authors: Cássio Luiz Coutinho Almeida-da-Silva; Nallusamy Sivakumar; Homer Asadi; Anna Chang-Chien; M Walid Qoronfleh; David M Ojcius; Musthafa Mohamed Essa Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 4.927