Literature DB >> 32123298

Exploring the protective effects of schizandrol A in acute myocardial ischemia mice by comprehensive metabolomics profiling integrated with molecular mechanism studies.

Qiong Lai1, Guang-Ying Yuan1, Hao Wang2, Ze-Liang Liu1, Jun-Ping Kou1, Bo-Yang Yu3, Fang Li4.   

Abstract

Schizandrol A (SA) is an bioactive component isolated from the Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill., which has been used as a remedy to prevent oxidative injury. However, whether the cardioprotective effect of SA is associated with regulating endogenous metabolites remains unclear, thus we performed comprehensive metabolomics profiling in acute myocardial ischemia (AMI) mice following SA treatment. AMI was induced in ICR mice by coronary artery ligation, then SA (6 mg·kg-1·d-1, ip) was administered. SA treatment significantly decreased the infarct size, preserved the cardiac function, and improved the biochemical indicators and cardiac pathological alterations. Moreover, SA (10, 100 M) significantly decreased the apoptotic index in OGD-treated H8c2 cardiomycytes in vitro. By using HPLC-Q-TOF/MS, we conducted metabonomics analysis to screen the significantly changed endogenous metabolites and construct the network in both serum and urine. The results revealed that SA regulated the pathways of glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, lysine biosynthesis, pyrimidine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, cysteine and methionine metabolism, valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis under the pathological conditions of AMI. Furthermore, we selected the regulatory enzymes related to heart disease, including ecto-5'-nucleotidase (NT5E), guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (GAMT), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF) and methionine synthase (MTR), for validation. In addition, SA was found to facilitate PI3K/Akt activation and inhibit the expression of NOX2 in AMI mice and OGD-treated H9c2 cells. In conclusion, we have elucidated SA-regulated endogenous metabolic pathways and constructed a regulatory metabolic network map. Furthermore, we have validated the new potential therapeutic targets and underlying molecular mechanisms of SA against AMI, which might provide a reference for its future application in cardiovascular diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OGD-treated H9c2 cardiomycytes; acute myocardial ischemia mice; cardioprotective effect; metabolic pathways; metabonomics; schizandrol A; therapeutic targets

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32123298      PMCID: PMC7471477          DOI: 10.1038/s41401-020-0377-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin        ISSN: 1671-4083            Impact factor:   6.150


Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and approximately 50% of CVD cases are associated with ischemic heart disease [1]. Acute myocardial ischemia (AMI) is a severe cardiovascular disease that is due to a sudden decrease in blood flow and oxygen supply to the heart, consequently leading to cardiac dysfunction, cardiac metabolic disorder, myocardial infarction, and even death [2]. It is widely acknowledged that the molecular mechanisms of AMI are complex and involve multiple pathways. This complexity offers the opportunity for metabolomics studies to uncover new insights into the progression of AMI. Currently, β-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are the mainstays of current treatment [3]. However, these treatments provide limited symptomatic relief, and the attempts to treat AMI thus far have been far from sufficient. Schizandrol A (SA) is a bioactive component isolated from Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. and is also one of the major effective ingredients of the well-known TCM formula ShengMai preparations, which acts as a remedy to prevent oxidative injury and treat coronary heart diseases [4, 5]. Previous studies have reported that SA exerts protective effects against H/R-induced vascular endothelial injury and glutamate-induced neuronal excitotoxicity [6-8] and that SA also exhibits anti-inflammatory activity [9]. In our previous study, a new drug combination comprising ginsenoside Rb1, ruscogenin and SA (GRS; 6:0.75:6 ratio) was shown to be effective in mitigating myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis [10]. As a component of this drug combination, SA showed cardioprotective effects against acute myocardial infarction [11]. However, the molecular mechanism of the functions of SA against AMI remains unclear, and further studies are still needed to elucidate this mechanism. Currently, metabolomics, which provides comprehensive profiling of small molecular substances in biological systems, is being increasingly applied to elucidate disease mechanisms and understand potential new drug targets [12]. Recently, there has been an increasing number of metabolomics investigations of cardiovascular diseases. Recent studies have identified 12 panels of specific biomarkers useful for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease based on metabolomics analysis of plasma samples from 2324 patients from 4 independent centers [13]. Moreover, in a further study, a functional metabolomics strategy was employed to characterize metabolite signatures associated with coronary artery disease. Neu5Ac was identified as a key metabolite, and its regulatory enzyme neuraminidase-1 may serve as a new avenue for therapeutic intervention for myocardial ischemia injury [14]. Li et al. conducted comprehensive profiling of the rat plasma and heart in response to AMI and Danqi Tongmai tablets via LC-MS-based metabolomics and lipidomics [15]. However, there have been few studies on the cardioprotective effects of SA from the perspective of metabonomics. Therefore, in our present study, metabonomics technology was employed to clarify the specific metabolic pathways modulated by SA to induce improvements in AMI. Furthermore, endogenous metabolites differentially regulated by SA were identified, and a regulatory metabolic network map was constructed. Several novel potential therapeutic targets closely related to cardiovascular diseases were selected, and the effects of SA on these targets were verified. We hope this work will help us understand more about the mechanisms of SA from the perspective of endogenous metabolites and provide some references for the investigation of SA in the future.

Materials and methods

Reagents and materials

Acetonitrile, methanol and formic acid were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Ultrapure water was obtained from a Milli-Q purification system (Milford, MA, USA). Schizandrol A (SA) was purchased from Chengdu Pufei De Biotech Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China; purity: HPLC ≥ 98%, lot number: 16103103). Metoprolol tartrate tablets were obtained from AstraZeneca (Taizhou, China; lot number: 1611A74). Creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay kits were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and cardiac troponin I (cTn-I) assay kits were obtained from Nanjing Jin Yibai Biological Technology Co., Ltd (Nanjing Jin, China). Antibodies against GAPDH were purchased from Shanghai KangChen Biotech Inc. (Shanghai, China). Antibodies against PD-ECGF, MTR, and NT5E were obtained from Proteintech (Wuhan, China). Antibodies against β-actin and GAMT were purchased from Bioworld Technology (St. Louis Park, MN, USA). Antibodies against PI3K, Akt, p-Akt, and NOX2 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA).

Animals and the AMI injury model

ICR male mice (8 weeks old, 22–25 g) were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Yangzhou University (Yangzhou, China; certificate No SCXK 2017–0007). All animals were housed individually in cages under hygienic conditions and placed in an environment with controlled temperature (23 ± 1 °C), humidity (30%–40%) and light (12-h light/dark cycle) with commercial standard solid rodent chow and water provided ad libitum. All animal welfare and experimental procedures were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the protocols used were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of China Pharmaceutical University, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China. The AMI model was produced as previously described [16], and the rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) intraperitoneally (i.p.). The adequacy of anesthesia was controlled by monitoring the lack of response to toe pinch. Then, the chest wall was shaved, and left thoracotomy was performed. A 6–0 silk suture was tied around the left anterior descending coronary artery approximately 3–4 mm from its origin. Sham-operated mice were subjected to the same surgical procedures without ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Successful myocardial ischemia injury by complete ligation of the left ascending (LAD) coronary artery was confirmed by the occurrence of ST-segment elevation on an electrocardiogram monitor. The mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 8/group): (1) the sham group (normal saline, i.p.); (2) the model group (normal saline, i.p.); (3) the SA group (SA, i.p.); (4) and the metoprolol (positive control drug) group (Met, i.g.). The dosage of SA in this experiment was 6 mg·kg−1·day−1, which was based on the effective dose identified in our previous study [11]. The clinically used dosage of Met was converted for use in our experiment, and the dosage was determined to be 5.14 mg·kg−1·day−1. All drugs were administered intraperitoneally after 20 min of ischemia.

TTC staining

After 24 h of ligation, the mice were euthanized and perfused with PBS by LV puncture. One-millimeter short-axis sections of the heart were incubated in 1% TTC solution at 37 °C for 15 min. The infarcted area was analyzed using ImageJ software (Bethesda Md, USA).

Blood sample analysis

At the end of the experiment, blood samples were obtained. Serum samples were collected by centrifuging the blood samples at 3500 rpm for 10 min. Then, the supernatant was obtained and immediately stored at −70 °C until analysis. The activities of CK and LDH and the content of CRP, TNF-α, and cTn-I in the serum were determined with commercial kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Echocardiography

After 24 h of ligation, cardiac function was evaluated using an echocardiographic system consisting of a Vevo 2100 Imaging System (Visual Sonics, Toronto, Canada) equipped with a 30 MHz transducer. The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane in O2 gas. After anesthetization, each mouse was placed on a heated imaging platform. The following parameters were calculated: left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) ((LVEDV-LVESV)/LVEDV), LV fractional shortening (FS) ((LVDd-LVDs)/LVDd), and stroke volume (SV) (LV Vold-LV Vols).

Hematoxylin-eosin staining of the heart

Heart samples from each group were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h. Next, the samples were embedded in paraffin wax, and 4-µm to 5-µm histological sections of the paraffin-embedded tissues were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The sections were imaged under a light microscope (DX45, Olympus Microsystems Ltd., Japan) [17].

Masson’s trichrome staining

Paraffin-embedded heart sections (4-µm to 5-µm thick) were stained with Masson’s trichrome. Normal tissue appeared red, and collagen tissue appeared blue. The heart sections were imaged at high pixel resolution with an OLYMPUS DP72 digital camera.

Cell preparation and culture

The rat cardiomyocyte cell line H9c2 was purchased from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The H9c2 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The cells were subcultured or subjected to experimental procedures at 80%–90% confluence.

Oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD)-treated cell model and drug treatment

To mimic ischemic injury in vitro, the OGD model was employed. OGD injury was induced by incubating cells with glucose-free DMEM and exposing them to a hypoxic environment of 94% N2, 5% CO2, and 1% O2 for 6 h. The cells were treated with SA (1–100 μM) during hypoxia.

Cell viability and LDH assays

Cell viability was detected using the MTT assay. After different treatments, cells were incubated with MTT at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL for 3 h. Then, the medium was discarded, and 150 μL of DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance was read at 570 nm with a reference wavelength of 650 nm, and cell viability was calculated as the percentage of absorbance relative to the control value. In addition, the release of LDH was also determined to measure the extent of cell injury. At the end of the incubation, the culture supernatant was collected, and LDH was detected at 490 nm.

TUNEL staining

Apoptotic cells were detected using the TUNEL Apoptosis Assay Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions as previously described [6]. Five fields from each slice were randomly analyzed under a confocal scanning microscope (LSM700, Zeiss, USA). The extent of cell apoptosis was expressed as the ratio of TUNEL-positive nuclei.

Flow cytometry analysis

FITC-conjugated Annexin V and PI were used to detect apoptotic cells. H9c2 cardiomyocytes were harvested, washed with PBS, and resuspended in binding buffer, and then FITC-Annexin-V and PI were added at a final concentration of 100 ng/mL. The mixture was incubated for 15 min in the dark and analyzed with a flow cytometer.

Untargeted metabonomics analysis

Sample pretreatment

Serum and urine were collected after ligation for 24 h. Serum samples were obtained by centrifuging the blood samples at 3500 rpm for 10 min at 15 °C. Urine samples were collected at 4 °C. All samples were kept at −80 °C until analysis. For untargeted extraction, 200 μL aliquots of serum and urine were precipitated by adding 600 μL of methanol and mixed for 60 s. The precipitated proteins were subsequently removed by centrifugation (13,000 rpm, 20 min) at 4 °C. Then, 150 μL of the supernatants were collected and dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen at room temperature. Finally, the supernatants were reconstituted with 100 μL of methanol for further analysis.

HPLC-Q-TOF MS analysis

Metabolite separation was performed using an Agilent Technologies 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS system (USA). The mobile phase consisted of water with 0.1% formic acid (eluent A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (eluent B). Serum analyses were archived on a SynergiTM Fusion-RP C18 column (50 mm × 2 mm i.d., 2.5 μm). The gradient program began with 5% B at 0–2 min, 5%–60% B at 2–10 min, 60%–70% B at 10–15 min, 70%–80% B at 15–20 min, 80%–95% B at 20–22 min, 95%–60% B at 22–28 min, and 60%–30% B at 28–30 min and then returned to the initial conditions with 2 min for equilibration. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. Urine analyses were performed on a TSK-GEL Amide-80 column (150 mm × 2.0 mm i.d., 5 μm). The gradient program began with 90% B at 0–5 min, 90%–50% B at 5–10 min, 50%–50% B at 10–14 min, and 50%–90% B at 14–16 min and then returned to the initial conditions with 2 min for equilibration. The flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. The sample injection volumes were 5 μL. Mass spectrometry was performed with an electrospray ionization ion source in the positive (ESI+) and negative (ESI−) ion modes. The MS parameters were set as follows: a fragmental voltage of 120 V, a nebulizer gas of 35 psig, a capillary voltage of 4000 V, a drying gas flow rate of 9 L/min, and a temperature of 325 °C. The data were collected in centroid and profile modes with a mass range of 50–1500 m/z using the high-resolution mode (4 GHz).

Method validation

The repeatability and robustness of the analytical procedure were validated by using the pooled quality control (QC) sample. The QC sample was prepared by mixing 200 µL of each test sample, and the pretreatment method of the QC samples was the same as that of the test samples. The QC sample was divided into five aliquots, which were randomly injected throughout the sequence list. Unsupervised PCA analysis showed good repeatability and robustness of the analytical method, as indicated by the tight grouping of the QC samples in the score plot (Supplementary Fig. S3). Meanwhile, we overlapped the total ion chromatograms (TICs) of the QC samples, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S4, which showed that the response intensity and retention time of each chromatographic peak basically overlapped. These data all demonstrated the high reproducibility of the method and the stability of the instrument during the experiment.

Data processing

The raw data (.d) acquired from Q-TOF LC/MS ESI+and ESI− analysis were transformed to data format (.mzdata) files by MassHunter Workstation Software (Version B.06.00, Agilent Technologies). Using R Foundation for Statistical Computing, data pretreatment procedures such as nonlinear retention time alignment, peak discrimination, filtering, alignment, and matching were performed with the XCMS package (http://metlin.scripps.edu/download/). Ion features that were present in less than 80% of the samples were screened out. The intensities of each peak detected were generated by virtue of the retention times and the m/z data pairs for each ion. After being normalized to total peak intensity, log-transformed and Pareto scaled, the processed data were imported into SIMCA-P 14.1 (Umetrics, Sweden) and MetaboAnalyst (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/), where they were subjected to multivariate data analyses, including Pareto-scaled principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Metabolites with a VIP value >1 were further subjected to Student’s t-test at the univariate level to measure the significance of each metabolite, and P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Western blot analysis

As reported [6], cells were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer supplemented with 1 mM PMSF. The infarct areas of heart tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer. The protein concentrations were quantified with a BCA assay kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of proteins (40 μg) were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to PVDF membranes, and blocked with 5% BSA solution. The blots were probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. The ECL plus system was used to detect the protein signal. The band densities were visualized by the ChemiDoc™ MP System (Bio-Rad), and the relative values were expressed relative to the signal of GAPDH or β-actin.

Immunohistochemistry

Twenty-four hours after ligation, the hearts were collected and processed for immunohistochemistry to analyze the expression of ecto-5’-nucleotidase (NT5E) and methionine synthase (MTR). The heart tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. The heart tissues were sectioned at a thickness of 4 µm, deparaffinized, rehydrated in PBS, and incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Then, the sections were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with blocking liquid (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Primary antibodies against MTR and NT5E (1:100) were added dropwise to the sections, and the sections were incubated at 4 °C for 24 h. After washing, the sections were incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200, Biogot Technology, Nanjing, China) at 37 °C for 1 h. After incubation with DAB and counterstaining with hematoxylin, a light microscope (DX45, Olympus Microsystems Ltd., Japan) was used to observe the dehydrated sections, and the sections were imaged at ×400 magnification.

Immunofluorescence staining

Slices of heart tissues were washed with ice-cold PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min, blocked with 5% BSA, and incubated with a rabbit PD-ECGF antibody at a 1:200 dilution overnight at 4 °C followed by an Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody at a 1:200 dilution for 2 h. Nuclei were visualized using DAPI. Fluorescence was observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope.

Statistical analysis

All values in the text and figures are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was carried out using Student’s two-tailed t-test for comparisons between two groups and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for comparisons between three or more groups. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

SA ameliorated myocardial injury and improved cardiac function in AMI mice

Mice were treated with SA by intraperitoneal administration after 2 h of myocardial ischemia induced by coronary artery ligation. The myocardial infarct size and some serum biochemical indicators were measured to evaluate the effect of SA on AMI. As illustrated in Fig. 1, 24 h of ischemia resulted in myocardial injury, as evidenced by an increased infarct size, increased CK and LDH activities, and increased levels of cTn-I, CRP, and TNF-α. However, SA and Met treatment significantly inhibited the increase in infarct size (Fig. 1a, b). Simultaneously, SA and Met markedly reduced the activities of CK and LDH (Fig. 1c, d), as well as the levels of cTn-I, CRP, and TNF-α (Fig. 1e–g).
Fig. 1

Effect of SA on AMI-induced myocardial injury. a TTC staining of the myocardial infarct area. b Graphic representation of the myocardial infarct size. c CK activity. d LDH activity. e cTn-I content. f CRP content. g TNF-α content. ##P < 0.01 vs. the sham group, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

Effect of SA on AMI-induced myocardial injury. a TTC staining of the myocardial infarct area. b Graphic representation of the myocardial infarct size. c CK activity. d LDH activity. e cTn-I content. f CRP content. g TNF-α content. ##P < 0.01 vs. the sham group, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group Furthermore, echocardiography was performed to detect the effects of SA on cardiac performance. As shown in Fig. 2, compared to sham surgery, AMI significantly impaired the LVEF, LVFS, and SV. In contrast, SA and Met markedly attenuated the AMI-induced impairment of cardiac function (Fig. 2a–d). In addition, histopathological examination of AMI mouse heart tissues revealed widespread myocardial structural disarray, a large number of inflammatory cells infiltrating the myocardial tissue and increased left ventricular wall fibrosis. The histological features were normalized or became milder, showing marked improvement, after SA treatment (Fig. 2e–h).
Fig. 2

Effect of SA on AMI-induced cardiac function and pathological changes. a Representative echocardiography images. The LVEF (b), LVFS (c), and SV (d) were measured by echocardiography. e Representative H&E staining results. f Representative Masson’s trichrome staining results. g Histopathological change scores. h Fibrosis scores. ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

Effect of SA on AMI-induced cardiac function and pathological changes. a Representative echocardiography images. The LVEF (b), LVFS (c), and SV (d) were measured by echocardiography. e Representative H&E staining results. f Representative Masson’s trichrome staining results. g Histopathological change scores. h Fibrosis scores. ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

SA inhibited myocardial apoptosis in AMI mice and OGD-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis

As shown in Fig. 3, the exposure of H9c2 cardiomyocytes to OGD led to a decrease in cell viability, whereas treatment with SA maintained cell viability (Fig. 3a). As LDH release is a recognized marker of cell injury, the release of LDH into the culture medium was also investigated. Compared to that in the control group, LDH release significantly increased after OGD injury, while treatment with SA markedly inhibited the release of LDH (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Effect of SA on AMI-induced myocardial apoptosis and OGD-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. a H9c2 cardiomyocytes were treated with SA followed by OGD, and cell viability was determined by the MTT assay. b The release of LDH in the culture medium of H9c2 cardiomyocytes was determined at the end of OGD. c The OGD-induced cell apoptosis rate was quantified by flow cytometry. d Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells in the indicated groups. e Representative photomicrographs of TUNEL staining in AMI mice. f Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells in AMI mice. ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

Effect of SA on AMI-induced myocardial apoptosis and OGD-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis. a H9c2 cardiomyocytes were treated with SA followed by OGD, and cell viability was determined by the MTT assay. b The release of LDH in the culture medium of H9c2 cardiomyocytes was determined at the end of OGD. c The OGD-induced cell apoptosis rate was quantified by flow cytometry. d Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells in the indicated groups. e Representative photomicrographs of TUNEL staining in AMI mice. f Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells in AMI mice. ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group Myocardial apoptosis is an essential element associated with infarct size expansion and cardiac dysfunction after ischemic injury [18]. Therefore, flow cytometry analysis and TUNEL staining were employed to explore whether SA prevented AMI-induced myocardial apoptosis. Quantitative analysis using flow cytometry confirmed that the apoptotic index was markedly increased compared with that of the control group. However, the apoptotic index was significantly decreased by treatment with SA (Fig. 3c, d). Compared to the sham-treated mice, the AMI mice exhibited obvious TUNEL-positive (apoptosis) cells in the ischemic myocardium following AMI. In contrast, a markedly lower proportion of apoptotic cells was observed in heart slices from SA-treated mice (Fig. 3e, f).

Principal component and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analyses of serum and urine samples

Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to perform unsupervised data analysis on the sham, model and SA groups. Most of these groups could be easily distinguished from each other. Supplementary Fig. S4 shows that the farthest distance was observed between the model group and sham operation group. However, the SA-treated samples were closer to the sham operation group than the model group. These results further indicated that SA improved myocardial ischemia, as myocardial ischemia mice were increasingly similar to healthy mice after SA administration. We further used OPLS-DA for supervised data analysis to elucidate the metabolic variations. All data acquired from the urine and serum were analyzed using SIMCA-P software for the discrimination and selection of significant variables. The OPLS‐DA model was constructed to determine the distinction of metabolic patterns between the model group and SA group in both the positive and negative ion modes. In theory, the R2Y and Q2 values should be close to 1, which indicates a high predictive ability [19]. As shown in Table 1, the parameters of model quality reflected the good fitness and predictability of OPLS-DA. Moreover, as illustrated in Fig. 4a-d, the metabolic profiles of both urine and serum samples from the model group were distinctly different from those of urine and serum samples from the SA group. Next, an S-plot was employed to identify altered metabolites that markedly contributed to the differences between the model and SA groups (Fig. 4e-h). The metabolites with VIP values over 1 and P-values lower than 0.05, which are listed in Tables 2, 3, were considered potential biomarkers [20].
Table 1

The parameters for assessing the model quality of OPLS-DA

Sample-modeR2X(cum)R2Y(cum)Q2
Urine-positive0.6910.9940.971
Urine-negative0.7070.9530.882
Serum-positive0.6540.9760.882
Serum-negative0.630.9830.912
Fig. 4

Plot of OPLS-DA scores and an S-plot of the model and SA groups based on the Q-TOF system for serum and urine analysis. a–d A plot of OPLS-DA scores of the model and SA groups. e–h An S-plot of the model and SA groups. The red points represent significantly different metabolic ions

Table 2

Statistical analysis of 48 differential metabolites from the comparison of model versus SA in urine

Ion modeIdentificationm/zRt (min)VIPP-valueFCMetabolic pathwaysEnzymesGenes
PositiveN2-Acetyl-L-aminoadipate451.1614.011.351.18 × 10−90.52Lysine biosynthesis
L-isoleucyl-L-proline154.0615.131.351.32 × 10−60.74
Fructoselysine568.1816.371.358.13 × 10−80.69
2’-O-Methyladenosine158.9215.361.346.10 × 10−113.52
1-Methylguanosine428.2211.101.347.37 × 10−90.56
L-Valine144.1014.921.341.63 × 10−81.53

Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis;

Propanoate metabolism;

Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis;

Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis

Propionyl-CoA carboxylase beta chain, mitochondrial;

Catechol O-methyltransferase

PCCB;

COMT

L-prolyl-L-proline538.1915.971.332.68 × 10−70.76
N-Acetylhistamine143.127.781.338.25 × 10−70.76Glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferaseQPCT
Creatinine149.114.661.332.00 × 10−60.55Arginine and proline metabolism
N-Methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide125.103.331.331.14 × 10−50.84Aldehyde oxidaseAOX1
L-prolyl-L-glycine258.1115.981.336.88 × 10−70.69
L-Methionine150.0614.321.338.88 × 10−50.90

Cysteine and methionine metabolism;

Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis

Methionine synthase;

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

MTR;

MTHFR

Xanthurenic acid414.303.071.321.06 × 10−82.03Tryptophan metabolismHemK methyltransferase family member 1HEMK1
L-Isoleucine396.164.261.324.78 × 10−70.51

Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis;

Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis

Branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase, cytosolic;

Branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase, mitochondrial

BCAT1;

BCAT2

Fibrin60.085.211.323.57 × 10−91.77
Taurine162.1114.701.323.14 × 10−91.58

Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism;

Nitrogen metabolism

Bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase;

Glutamate decarboxylase 2

BAAT;

GAD2

Glycylprolylhydroxyproline596.3016.811.311.65 × 10−60.75
Prolylhydroxyproline281.0915.981.301.44 × 10−20.96
Deoxyguanosine352.1013.461.306.47 × 10−72.80Purine metabolism

5’-nucleotidase;

Deoxyguanosine kinase, mitochondrial

NT5E;

DGUOK

Isovalerylsarcosine284.012.231.267.96 × 10−40.63Glycine N-acyltransferaseGLYAT
3’-O-Methylguanosine331.1411.221.251.59 × 10−40.63
Spermidine323.0715.481.211.30 × 10−20.89

Arginine and proline metabolism;

beta-Alanine metabolism

Spermine synthase;

3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial;

Thioredoxin reductase 1, cytoplasmic

SMS;

ACAA2;

TXNRD1

Thymine127.056.721.181.61 × 10−51.65Pyrimidine metabolism

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase [NADP(+)];

Thymidine phosphorylase

DPYD;

TYMP

5-Methylcytidine516.2110.431.171.58 × 10−30.66
Negative4-Phospho-L-aspartate324.963.071.412.20 × 10−123.04

Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism;

Lysine biosynthesis;

Cysteine and methionine metabolism

Beta-Glycerophosphoric acid216.9315.381.382.47 × 10−102.47
m-Chlorohippuric acid147.043.101.387.11 × 10−91.94
Glycylprolylhydroxyproline321.1316.861.376.11 × 10−60.60
Homoserine259.0915.631.375.93 × 10−70.50

Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism;

Lysine biosynthesis;

Cysteine and methionine metabolism;

Sulfur metabolism

Guanidineacetic acid96.9715.331.369.22 × 10−91.85

Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism;

Arginine and proline metabolism

Guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase;

Glycine amidinotransferase, mitochondrial

GAMT;

GATM

D-Glutamine145.0616.001.364.63 × 10−50.71D-Glutamine and D-glutamate metabolism

Glutaminase liver isoform, mitochondrial;

Glutaminase kidney isoform, mitochondrial

GLS2;

GLS

L-Iditol306.0914.831.361.00 × 10−50.48Sorbitol dehydrogenaseSORD
Ureidoisobutyric acid104.0416.071.361.07 × 10−50.74Pyrimidine metabolism

Dihydropyrimidinase;

Beta-ureidopropionase

DPYS;

UPB1

Tyramine glucuronide312.1116.721.343.03 × 10−71.60UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B28UGT2B28
Galactonic acid299.1115.131.341.80 × 10−30.80Galactose metabolism
5-Hydroxy-2-oxo-4-ureido-2,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate176.001.681.347.15 × 10−50.72Putative 2-oxo-4-hydroxy-4-carboxy-5-ureidoimidazoline decarboxylasePRHOXNB
Uric acid256.0614.021.333.34 × 10−40.77Purine metabolismXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseXDH
Creatine169.0615.281.323.28 × 10−91.67

Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism;

Arginine and proline metabolism

Guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase;

Creatine kinase S-type, mitochondrial

GAMT;

CKMT2

N-Glycolylneuraminic acid324.1015.481.324.62 × 10−40.79Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolismN-acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferaseCMAS
Citric acid279.044.461.313.87 × 10−30.83Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)

ATP-citrate synthase;

Citrate synthase, mitochondrial

ACLY;

CS

Tetrahydropteridine263.0415.001.311.88 × 10−30.81

Dihydropteridine reductase;

Inositol-tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase

QDPR;

ITPK1

D-Tagatose220.0814.191.307.76 × 10−40.78Galactose metabolism
Deoxyadenosine monophosphate325.1112.401.301.46 × 10−40.57Purine metabolism

5’-nucleotidase;

5’(3’)-deoxyribonucleotidase, mitochondrial

NT5E;

NT5M

D-Serine225.0616.131.195.40 × 10−61.39Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism

Phosphoserine phosphatase;

Serine racemase

PSPH;

SRR

Paraxanthine222.1014.271.172.82 × 10−30.49Caffeine metabolism

Arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1;

Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase

NAT1;

XDH

Uridine367.0713.671.155.19 × 10−45.26Pyrimidine metabolism

5’-nucleotidase;

5’(3’)-deoxyribonucleotidase, mitochondrial

NT5E;

NT5M

Dihydroferulic acid 4-sulfate335.0514.081.034.28 × 10−41.74
4-Imidazolone-5-propionic acid257.0815.421.012.23 × 10−41.37Histidine metabolism

Urocanate hydratase;

Probable imidazolonepropionase

UROC1;

AMDHD1

Table 3

Statistical analysis of 14 differential metabolites from the comparison of model versus SA in serum

Ion modeIdentificationm/zRt (min)VIPP-valueFCMetabolic pathwaysEnzymesGenes
PositivePalmitic acid279.2313.252.075.74 × 10−60.66

Fatty acid elongation in mitochondria;

Fatty acid biosynthesis

Fatty acid synthaseFASN
Dityrosine219.030.641.201.26 × 10−31.25
Negative5-Oxo-ETE/5-KETE295.2313.251.951.06 × 10−60.63
Glyceraldehyde116.912.231.756.56 × 10−61.61Aldose reductaseAKR1B1
L-Lactic acid117.041.311.684.88 × 10−51.52

Propanoate metabolism;

Glycolysis or Gluconeogenesis;

Pyruvate metabolism

L-lactate dehydrogenase A-like 6 ALDHAL6A
Adipate semialdehyde160.902.141.551.14 × 10−32.07Alcohol dehydrogenase [NADP(+)]AKR1A1
p-Cresol sulfate187.017.911.483.93 × 10−32.77
Orotic acid128.030.721.441.54 × 10−41.46Pyrimidine metabolism

Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone), mitochondrial;

Uridine 5’-monophosphate synthase

DHODH;

UMPS

Sphinganine-1-phosphate638.3512.001.141.60 × 10−21.60

Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 1;

Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 2

PPAP2A;

PPAP2C

LysoPE(0:0/18:0)591.3712.751.626.61 × 10−40.76Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 2ENPP2
LysoPE(22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)/0:0)452.2912.581.592.88 × 10−41.29
LysoPE(20:0/0:0)620.3115.261.438.14 × 10−30.66
LysoPE(18:2(9Z,12Z)/0:0)524.2912.331.151.65 × 10−21.31
LysoPE(18:1(11Z)/0:0)538.3312.081.044.23 × 10−61.21
The parameters for assessing the model quality of OPLS-DA Plot of OPLS-DA scores and an S-plot of the model and SA groups based on the Q-TOF system for serum and urine analysis. a–d A plot of OPLS-DA scores of the model and SA groups. e–h An S-plot of the model and SA groups. The red points represent significantly different metabolic ions Statistical analysis of 48 differential metabolites from the comparison of model versus SA in urine Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis; Propanoate metabolism; Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis; Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis Propionyl-CoA carboxylase beta chain, mitochondrial; Catechol O-methyltransferase PCCB; COMT Cysteine and methionine metabolism; Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis Methionine synthase; Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase MTR; MTHFR Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis; Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis Branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase, cytosolic; Branched-chain-amino-acid aminotransferase, mitochondrial BCAT1; BCAT2 Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism; Nitrogen metabolism Bile acid-CoA:amino acid N-acyltransferase; Glutamate decarboxylase 2 BAAT; GAD2 5’-nucleotidase; Deoxyguanosine kinase, mitochondrial NT5E; DGUOK Arginine and proline metabolism; beta-Alanine metabolism Spermine synthase; 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, mitochondrial; Thioredoxin reductase 1, cytoplasmic SMS; ACAA2; TXNRD1 Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase [NADP(+)]; Thymidine phosphorylase DPYD; TYMP Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism; Lysine biosynthesis; Cysteine and methionine metabolism Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism; Lysine biosynthesis; Cysteine and methionine metabolism; Sulfur metabolism Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism; Arginine and proline metabolism Guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase; Glycine amidinotransferase, mitochondrial GAMT; GATM Glutaminase liver isoform, mitochondrial; Glutaminase kidney isoform, mitochondrial GLS2; GLS Dihydropyrimidinase; Beta-ureidopropionase DPYS; UPB1 Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism; Arginine and proline metabolism Guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase; Creatine kinase S-type, mitochondrial GAMT; CKMT2 ATP-citrate synthase; Citrate synthase, mitochondrial ACLY; CS Dihydropteridine reductase; Inositol-tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase QDPR; ITPK1 5’-nucleotidase; 5’(3’)-deoxyribonucleotidase, mitochondrial NT5E; NT5M Phosphoserine phosphatase; Serine racemase PSPH; SRR Arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1; Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidase NAT1; XDH 5’-nucleotidase; 5’(3’)-deoxyribonucleotidase, mitochondrial NT5E; NT5M Urocanate hydratase; Probable imidazolonepropionase UROC1; AMDHD1 Statistical analysis of 14 differential metabolites from the comparison of model versus SA in serum Fatty acid elongation in mitochondria; Fatty acid biosynthesis Propanoate metabolism; Glycolysis or Gluconeogenesis; Pyruvate metabolism Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (quinone), mitochondrial; Uridine 5’-monophosphate synthase DHODH; UMPS Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 1; Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase 2 PPAP2A; PPAP2C In addition, a hierarchical clustering heatmap was applied to view the data more intuitively. The heatmap indicated that the concentrations of metabolic biomarkers in the SA group differed from those in the model group (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Heatmap of the 49 differentially regulated endogenous metabolites in the serum and urine between the model and SA groups

Heatmap of the 49 differentially regulated endogenous metabolites in the serum and urine between the model and SA groups

Enrichment analysis of metabolic pathways and regulatory enzymes

To reveal the metabolic processes of the metabolites, the metabolites that were significantly changed in the serum and urine were entered into MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) for pathway enrichment analysis. Twenty associated pathways in total were identified. According to the enrichment fold of the pathways, the major modulated pathways involved were glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, spermidine and spermine biosynthesis, and methionine metabolism (Fig. 6a-c). Furthermore, pathway and enrichment analysis of related regulatory enzymes was performed by STRING (https://string-db.org/) and Metascape (https://www.metascape.org/). A protein interaction network was constructed and is shown in Fig. 6d. The results of GO enrichment analysis showed that the functions of the regulatory enzymes mainly included cellular amino acid metabolic processes, drug metabolic processes, the metabolism of nucleotides, and nucleobase catabolic processes (Fig. 6e). Our results suggested that regulatory enzymes affected by SA were mainly involved in drug metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis pathways, as identified by KEGG enrichment analysis (Table 4). According to these results, a schematic diagram of the altered metabolic pathways in both the serum and urine, which is shown in Fig. 7, was constructed; SA may affect these pathways to ameliorate AMI.
Fig. 6

Enrichment analysis of metabolic pathways and related regulatory enzymes. a Differential metabolite network map. b Overview of the pathways related to the differentially regulated endogenous metabolites. c Summary of pathway analysis by MetPA. d Regulatory protein network map. e Regulatory enzyme GO enrichment analysis results

Table 4

KEGG pathway enrichment results of regulatory enzymes

Enrichment pathwayObserved gene countBackground gene countMatching proteins in our network
Drug metabolism876DPYD,DPYS,NAT1,TYMP,UGT2B28,UMPS,UPB1,XDH
Pyrimidine metabolism8100DHODH,DPYD,DPYS,NT5E,NT5M,TYMP,UMPS,UPB1
Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis519BCAT1,BCAT2,DPYD,DPYS,UPB1
beta-Alanine metabolism531DPYD,DPYS,GAD2,SMS,UPB1
Cysteine and methionine metabolism544BCAT1,BCAT2,LDHAL6A,MTR,SMS
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation548ACAA2,AOX1,BCAT1,BCAT2,PCCB
Biosynthesis of amino acids572BCAT1,BCAT2,CS,MTR,PSPH
Pentose and glucuronate interconversions434AKR1A1,AKR1B1,SORD,UGT2B28
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism439GAMT,GATM,PSPH,SRR
Arginine and proline metabolism448CKMT2,GAMT,GATM,SMS
2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism317BCAT1,BCAT2,CS
Nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism330AOX1,NT5E,NT5M
Purine metabolism5173DGUOK,NT5E,NT5M,URAD,XDH
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis24BCAT1,BCAT2
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism335GAD2,GLS,GLS2
Caffeine metabolism25NAT1,XDH
D-Glutamine and D-glutamate metabolism25GLS,GLS2
Carbon metabolism4116CS,MTHFR,PCCB,PSPH
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism211BAAT,GAD2
Glycerolipid metabolism359AKR1A1,AKR1B1,PPAP2C
Selenocompound metabolism216MTR,TXNRD1
Arginine biosynthesis220GLS,GLS2
One carbon pool by folate220MTHFR,MTR
GABAergic synapse388GAD2,GLS,GLS2
Histidine metabolism223AMDHD1,UROC1
Proximal tubule bicarbonate reclamation223GLS,GLS2
Folate biosynthesis226AKR1B1,QDPR
Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism228CS,PCCB
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)230ACLY,CS
Propanoate metabolism232LDHAL6A,PCCB
Fructose and mannose metabolism233AKR1B1,SORD
Tyrosine metabolism236AOX1,COMT
Ether lipid metabolism246ENPP2,PPAP2C
Fatty acid metabolism248ACAA2,FASN
Steroid hormone biosynthesis258COMT,UGT2B28
Retinol metabolism262AOX1,UGT2B28
Central carbon metabolism in cancer265GLS,GLS2
Drug metabolism-cytochrome P450266AOX1,UGT2B28
Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis268AKR1A1,LDHAL6A
Chemical carcinogenesis276NAT1,UGT2B28
Peroxisome281BAAT,XDH
Fig. 7

Metabolic network of the significantly changed endogenous metabolites in both the serum and urine. The metabolites that were elevated in the SA group compared with the model group are represented by blue, and the reduced metabolites are represented by yellow

Enrichment analysis of metabolic pathways and related regulatory enzymes. a Differential metabolite network map. b Overview of the pathways related to the differentially regulated endogenous metabolites. c Summary of pathway analysis by MetPA. d Regulatory protein network map. e Regulatory enzyme GO enrichment analysis results KEGG pathway enrichment results of regulatory enzymes Metabolic network of the significantly changed endogenous metabolites in both the serum and urine. The metabolites that were elevated in the SA group compared with the model group are represented by blue, and the reduced metabolites are represented by yellow

Validation of the potential therapeutic targets of SA

According to the results of KEGG enrichment analysis of regulatory enzymes of differential metabolic markers, the regulatory enzymes involved in the top 10 pathways were selected. The regulatory enzymes related to heart disease, including ecto-5’-nucleotidase (NT5E), guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase (GAMT), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF) and methionine synthase (MTR), were selected for further validation. As illustrated in Fig. 8, AMI resulted in a noticeable decrease in NT5E, GAMT, and MTR expression and a significant increase in PD-ECGF expression. However, SA markedly promoted the expression of NT5E, PD-ECGF, and MTR and exerted no effect on GAMT expression (Fig. 8a–d). In addition, immunohistochemical analysis showed that SA significantly increased the expression of NT5E and MTR (Fig. 8e, f) and further promoted PD-ECGF expression, as evidenced by immunofluorescence staining (Fig. 8g).
Fig. 8

Changes in protein expression in the heart tissue of AMI mice after 24 h. The expression of NT5E (a), GAMT (b), PD-ECGF (c), and MTR (d) was detected using Western blot analysis. The expression of NT5E (e) and MTR (f) was detected using immunohistochemistry. The expression of PD-ECGF was measured by immunofluorescence staining (g). The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

Changes in protein expression in the heart tissue of AMI mice after 24 h. The expression of NT5E (a), GAMT (b), PD-ECGF (c), and MTR (d) was detected using Western blot analysis. The expression of NT5E (e) and MTR (f) was detected using immunohistochemistry. The expression of PD-ECGF was measured by immunofluorescence staining (g). The results are presented as the mean ± SEM. ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

SA ameliorated AMI by regulating the PI3K-Akt-NOX2 signaling pathway

As shown in Fig. 9, the Western blotting results showed that the expression of PI3K, p-Akt, and NOX2 was upregulated in AMI mice and OGD-induced cardiomyocytes. SA treatment significantly further increased the expression of PI3K and p-Akt and downregulated the expression of NOX2.
Fig. 9

The effect of SA on the PI3K-Akt-NOX2 signaling pathway in AMI mice and OGD-induced cardiomyocytes. The expression of PI3K (a), Akt, p-Akt (b), and NOX2 (c) in AMI mice was detected using Western blot analysis. The expression of PI3K (d), Akt, p-Akt (e) and NOX2 (f) in OGD-induced cardiomyocytes was determined using Western blot analysis. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

The effect of SA on the PI3K-Akt-NOX2 signaling pathway in AMI mice and OGD-induced cardiomyocytes. The expression of PI3K (a), Akt, p-Akt (b), and NOX2 (c) in AMI mice was detected using Western blot analysis. The expression of PI3K (d), Akt, p-Akt (e) and NOX2 (f) in OGD-induced cardiomyocytes was determined using Western blot analysis. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. the control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the model group

Discussion

In the present study, we confirmed the efficacy of SA in AMI-injured mice and OGD-injured cardiomyocytes, as evidenced by the decrease in infarct size and the most common biomarkers for myocardial ischemia, such as LDH, CK, cTn-I, CRP, and TNF-α. In addition, echocardiography is clinically applied to evaluate cardiac function and structure [21]. LVEF and LVFS measurements are used as key markers of contractile capabilities both in basic and clinical studies. The main function of the heart in the circulatory system is to pump blood to meet the needs of metabolism. Thus, SV is also a basic indicator used to evaluate cardiac function [22]. Our present results demonstrated that treatment with SA preserved cardiac function and improved cardiac tissue damage and fibrosis in mice subjected to AMI injury. These positive effects of SA were associated with the suppression of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Accumulating pharmacological studies have suggested that the loss of cardiomyocytes as a result of apoptosis is essential in various heart diseases and inevitably contributes to heart failure [23]. Intervening in the apoptotic process could attenuate the loss of cardiomyocytes, alleviate cardiac injury and ultimately inhibit the occurrence and development of AMI injury. In addition, the HPLC-Q-TOF/MS metabolomics approach was selected to explore metabolic changes in mice with AMI and uncover the treatment mechanism of SA. Forty-eight differentially regulated metabolites were found between the model group and SA group. SA markedly increased the levels of fructoselysine, 1-methylguanosine, N-acetylhistamine, creatinine and L-isoleucine, D-glutamine, and citric acid compared to those in AMI mice. Some studies have shown that later-stage or advanced-stage glycation processes involve the degradation of fructoselysine and the glycation of proteins by methylglyoxal to form advanced glycation end products, which contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular complications of diabetes [24]. Additionally, 1-methylguanosine was identified as a marker that predicts the development of nephropathy in T2DM patients [25]. Meanwhile, in the general population, moderately elevated plasma creatinine and L-isoleucine levels are correlated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease and early death [26, 27]. In addition, glutamine has been found to maintain cardiac function perioperatively and promote glycogen metabolism by enhancing mitochondrial function and stimulating mTORC1 [28]. Citric acid is an essential metabolite involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle. The TCA cycle is the ultimate metabolic pathway of the three major nutrients (carbohydrates, lipids, amino acids), and it is also an important hub of the metabolic link between carbohydrates, lipids and amino acids [29]. The levels of xanthurenic acid, D-serine and thymine in the SA group were lower than those in the AMI group. Xanthurenic acid is a biomarker related to the kynurenine pathway. In patients with suspected stable angina pectoris, elevated levels of plasma kynurenines predict an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction, and risk estimates are generally stronger in subgroups with evidence of impaired glucose homeostasis [30]. Furthermore, atherosclerosis is the underlying cause of most myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke episodes. Recent studies have suggested that there is a direct relationship between D-serine and intima media thickness, which is an early sign of atherosclerosis [31]. Moreover, larger cytosine-thymine-guanine expansions have been reported to be associated with a higher rate of conduction disease progression and a trend toward an increased risk of cardiac events [32]. Subsequently, the pathways of differential metabolites and regulatory enzymes were further analyzed, and we found that SA mainly regulated metabolic pathways, including the glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, lysine biosynthesis, pyrimidine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, cysteine and methionine metabolism, and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis pathways. The glycine, serine and threonine metabolism pathway supplies important energy metabolism precursors for the citrate cycle. Previous studies have shown that glycine and serine can reduce myocardial inflammation by activating glycine receptors and indirectly inhibit collagen production in cardiac fibroblasts, ultimately inhibiting myocardial fibrosis [33]. In addition, impairments in cardiac energy metabolism and mitochondrial function are intricately correlated with cardiac dysfunction. Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to increased oxidative stress, cell death and myocardial remodeling. Recent developments suggest that mitochondrial protein lysine biosynthesis modulates the sensitivity of the heart to stress and hence the propensity for heart failure [34]. Furthermore, during arginine and proline metabolism, creatine, which reacts with ATP during the catalysis of creatine kinase, is broken down into phosphocreatine and creatinine. Under conditions of AMI, the level of creatine is depressed significantly. Cardiac ischemia and reperfusion seem to shift arginine metabolism from forming nitric oxide to forming polyamine, which may limit functional recovery after reperfusion [35]. In addition, the cysteine and methionine metabolic pathways are also widely associated with the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases [36-38]. To further explore the potential targets of SA in inducing cardioprotection, NT5E, GAMT, PD-ECGF, and MTR were identified and primarily verified in the present study. NT5E is the key enzyme that controls the degradation of adenine nucleotides into adenosine via the enzymatic dephosphorylation of AMP in the ischemic myocardium. Adenosine, a degradation substance of ATP, exerts an essential role in regulating cardiac contractility, coronary vascular tone, and cardiac substrate utilization [39-41]. Recent studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress may cause the inactivation of NT5E and decrease the concentration of adenosine in the rat heart [42]. Our results indicated that AMI inhibited the expression of NT5E while SA markedly reversed this suppression. Moreover, creatine is mainly produced through two essential chemical reactions and a second step catalyzed by GAMT. GAMT knockout mice show increased susceptibility to ischemia/reperfusion injury, which is reflected by changes in high-energy phosphate metabolism [43]. Our results indicated that SA had no effect on the promotion of GAMT expression. In addition, previous studies have documented an increase in the expression of the angiogenic protein PD-ECGF in a rat model of MI [44]. In our present study, SA further promoted PD-ECGF expression, which is also a potent peptide with anti-apoptotic activity. Simultaneously, SA promoted the expression of MTR, which is one of the key enzymes in folate metabolism. Several studies have suggested that MTR deficiency can increase the risk of congenital heart disease [45]. Based on the above results, it can be reasonably speculated that SA might attenuate AMI-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis through the promotion of NT5E, PD-ECGF, and MTR expression. Furthermore, we explored the potential pathways regulated by SA. Previous investigations have demonstrated that NT5E regulates the production of adenosine and that adenosine modulates vascular tone via PI3K/Akt signaling cascade-mediated eNOS activation and NO production [46]. In our present study, we found that SA promoted the expression of NT5E, while SA was found to facilitate PI3K/Akt activation and inhibit the expression of NOX2. These findings suggest that the cardioprotective effect of SA is at least partially mediated by the PI3K/Akt-NOX2 signaling pathway.

Conclusion

In summary, for the first time we revealed the endogenous metabolic small molecules and metabolic pathways regulated by SA in AMI through nontargeted metabonomics and the construction of a regulatory metabolic network map. Furthermore, several potential new targets of SA, such as NT5E, PD-ECGF, and MTR, were identified and verified, and SA was shown to exert cardioprotective effects against AMI, at least in part through the PI3K/Akt-NOX2 signaling pathway. Supplementary information Supplementary Figure 1 Supplementary Figure 2 Supplementary Figure 3 Supplementary Figure 4 Supplementary Figure 5
  42 in total

1.  Identification of multiple constituents in the traditional Chinese medicine formula Sheng-Mai San and rat plasma after oral administration by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS.

Authors:  Yan-Hui Wang; Cong Qiu; Da-Wei Wang; Zheng-Fang Hu; Bo-Yang Yu; Dan-Ni Zhu
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.935

2.  Identification of schisandrin as a vascular endothelium protective component in YiQiFuMai Powder Injection using HUVECs binding and HPLC-DAD-Q-TOF-MS/MS analysis.

Authors:  Fang Li; Yi-Sha Tan; Hong-Lin Chen; Yan Yan; Ke-Feng Zhai; Da-Peng Li; Jun-Ping Kou; Bo-Yang Yu
Journal:  J Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 3.  Brain oxidative stress as basic target of antioxidant traditional oriental medicines.

Authors:  Tetsuya Konishi
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 via PI3K/Akt and Nrf-2 signaling pathways mediates the anti-inflammatory activity of Schisandrin in Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-stimulated macrophages.

Authors:  Sun Young Park; Da Jung Park; Young Hun Kim; Younghee Kim; Sun Gun Kim; Kwang Jae Shon; Young-Whan Choi; Sang-Joon Lee
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.685

5.  A Strategy for Optimizing the Combination of Active Components Based on Chinese Medicinal Formula Sheng-Mai-San for Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Fang Li; Xiao-Xue Fan; Chun Chu; Yu Zhang; Jun-Ping Kou; Bo-Yang Yu
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 6.  Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Theodore Kalogeris; Christopher P Baines; Maike Krenz; Ronald J Korthuis
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.813

7.  Schizandrin protects primary cultures of rat cortical cells from glutamate-induced excitotoxicity.

Authors:  Hao-Yuan Cheng; Ming-Tsuen Hsieh; Chi-Rei Wu; Fan-Hsiu Tsai; Tsung-Chun Lu; Chia-Chang Hsieh; Wei-Chu Li; Yao-Tung Lin; Wen-Huang Peng
Journal:  J Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 8.  Myocardial ischemia: current concepts and future perspectives.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shimokawa; Satoshi Yasuda
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Cardioprotection by combination of three compounds from ShengMai preparations in mice with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury through AMPK activation-mediated mitochondrial fission.

Authors:  Fang Li; Xiaoxue Fan; Yu Zhang; Lizhi Pang; Xiaonan Ma; Meijia Song; Junping Kou; Boyang Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015.

Authors:  Gregory A Roth; Catherine Johnson; Amanuel Abajobir; Foad Abd-Allah; Semaw Ferede Abera; Gebre Abyu; Muktar Ahmed; Baran Aksut; Tahiya Alam; Khurshid Alam; François Alla; Nelson Alvis-Guzman; Stephen Amrock; Hossein Ansari; Johan Ärnlöv; Hamid Asayesh; Tesfay Mehari Atey; Leticia Avila-Burgos; Ashish Awasthi; Amitava Banerjee; Aleksandra Barac; Till Bärnighausen; Lars Barregard; Neeraj Bedi; Ezra Belay Ketema; Derrick Bennett; Gebremedhin Berhe; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Shimelash Bitew; Jonathan Carapetis; Juan Jesus Carrero; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Carlos Andres Castañeda-Orjuela; Jacqueline Castillo-Rivas; Ferrán Catalá-López; Jee-Young Choi; Hanne Christensen; Massimo Cirillo; Leslie Cooper; Michael Criqui; David Cundiff; Albertino Damasceno; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Kairat Davletov; Samath Dharmaratne; Prabhakaran Dorairaj; Manisha Dubey; Rebecca Ehrenkranz; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Emerito Jose A Faraon; Alireza Esteghamati; Talha Farid; Maryam Farvid; Valery Feigin; Eric L Ding; Gerry Fowkes; Tsegaye Gebrehiwot; Richard Gillum; Audra Gold; Philimon Gona; Rajeev Gupta; Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Tesfaye Hailu; Gessessew Bugssa Hailu; Graeme Hankey; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Kalkidan Hassen Abate; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon I Hay; Masako Horino; Peter J Hotez; Kathryn Jacobsen; Spencer James; Mehdi Javanbakht; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Denny John; Jost Jonas; Yogeshwar Kalkonde; Chante Karimkhani; Amir Kasaeian; Yousef Khader; Abdur Khan; Young-Ho Khang; Sahil Khera; Abdullah T Khoja; Jagdish Khubchandani; Daniel Kim; Dhaval Kolte; Soewarta Kosen; Kristopher J Krohn; G Anil Kumar; Gene F Kwan; Dharmesh Kumar Lal; Anders Larsson; Shai Linn; Alan Lopez; Paulo A Lotufo; Hassan Magdy Abd El Razek; Reza Malekzadeh; Mohsen Mazidi; Toni Meier; Kidanu Gebremariam Meles; George Mensah; Atte Meretoja; Haftay Mezgebe; Ted Miller; Erkin Mirrakhimov; Shafiu Mohammed; Andrew E Moran; Kamarul Imran Musa; Jagat Narula; Bruce Neal; Frida Ngalesoni; Grant Nguyen; Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer; Mayowa Owolabi; George Patton; João Pedro; Dima Qato; Mostafa Qorbani; Kazem Rahimi; Rajesh Kumar Rai; Salman Rawaf; Antônio Ribeiro; Saeid Safiri; Joshua A Salomon; Itamar Santos; Milena Santric Milicevic; Benn Sartorius; Aletta Schutte; Sadaf Sepanlou; Masood Ali Shaikh; Min-Jeong Shin; Mehdi Shishehbor; Hirbo Shore; Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Eugene Sobngwi; Saverio Stranges; Soumya Swaminathan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Niguse Tadele Atnafu; Fisaha Tesfay; J S Thakur; Amanda Thrift; Roman Topor-Madry; Thomas Truelsen; Stefanos Tyrovolas; Kingsley Nnanna Ukwaja; Olalekan Uthman; Tommi Vasankari; Vasiliy Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Tolassa Wakayo; David Watkins; Robert Weintraub; Andrea Werdecker; Ronny Westerman; Charles Shey Wiysonge; Charles Wolfe; Abdulhalik Workicho; Gelin Xu; Yuichiro Yano; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Theo Vos; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher Murray
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  6 in total

1.  Aminoacylase-1 plays a key role in myocardial fibrosis and the therapeutic effects of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rg3 in mouse heart failure.

Authors:  Qiong Lai; Fu-Ming Liu; Wang-Lin Rao; Guang-Ying Yuan; Zhao-Yang Fan; Lu Zhang; Fei Fu; Jun-Ping Kou; Bo-Yang Yu; Fang Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 7.169

2.  Virtual screening and network pharmacology-based synergistic mechanism identification of multiple components contained in Guanxin V against coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Bo Liang; Xiao-Xiao Zhang; Ning Gu
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-11-13

3.  Cardioprotective effect of ginsenoside Rb1 via regulating metabolomics profiling and AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent mitophagy.

Authors:  Jingui Hu; Ling Zhang; Fei Fu; Qiong Lai; Lu Zhang; Tao Liu; Boyang Yu; Junping Kou; Fang Li
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 5.735

4.  Effect of acute high-intensity exercise on myocardium metabolic profiles in rat and human study via metabolomics approach.

Authors:  Lijun Wu; Jiayi Wang; Xiuhui Cao; Yue Tian; Jia Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Omentin1 ameliorates myocardial ischemia-induced heart failure via SIRT3/FOXO3a-dependent mitochondrial dynamical homeostasis and mitophagy.

Authors:  Jingui Hu; Tao Liu; Fei Fu; Zekun Cui; Qiong Lai; Yuanyuan Zhang; Boyang Yu; Fuming Liu; Junping Kou; Fang Li
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 8.440

6.  Schisandrol A Attenuates Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Myocardial Apoptosis through Upregulation of 14-3-3θ.

Authors:  Shuaishuai Gong; Jincheng Liu; Shiyao Wan; Weiwei Yang; Yuanyuan Zhang; Boyang Yu; Fang Li; Junping Kou
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 6.543

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.