| Literature DB >> 32123232 |
Vertica Agnihotri1, Abhishek Gupta1, Lalit Kumar2, Sharmistha Dey3.
Abstract
Head & Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma is one of the highest mortality factors in the world due to the lack of potential biomarker for early detection of disease. There is an urgent need for molecular marker involved in disease progression which remains suppressed normally, required for specificity. HLA-G is highly expressed in cancers and creates immune-suppressive microenvironment. Cancerous cells secrete inflammatory cytokines like IL-10,IFN-γ which increase expression of immunosuppressive molecules, such as HLA-G. We evaluated sHLA-G protein level in serum of 120 HNSCC patients at diagnosis and after therapy and compared with 99 individuals by SPR, ELISA and determined its mRNA level by qRT-PCR. sHLA-G was correlated with serum IL-10 and IFN-γ of the patients. Significant elevated levels of sHLA-G were observed in patients (8.25 ± 1.74 ng/µl) than control (6.45 ± 1.31 ng/µl). Levels were declined in (8.09 ± 1.79 ng/µl to 6.64 ± 1.33 ng/µl) patients in response to therapy. sHLA-G levels with tumor burden (8.16 ± 1.91 to 6.63 ± 1.32 ng/µl), node (8.62 ± 1.45 to 6.66 ± 1.26 ng/µl), PDSCC (8.14 ± 0.62 to 5.65 ± 0.27 ng/µl) and oropharynx (7.90 ± 1.24 to 6.10 ± 1.33 ng/µl) showed a positive and significant response to therapy. Findings indicate that sHLA-G can be a potential diagnostic serum protein marker for HNSCC due to its suppressive function and over expression in diseased condition with the influence of cytokines.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32123232 PMCID: PMC7052243 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60811-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline clinical characteristics of the study group.
| Study Group (n = 120) (HNSCC patients) | Control Group (n = 99) | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 107 | 78 |
| Female | 13 | 21 |
| Mean ± SD | 49.01 ± 11.20 | 42.3 ± 12.40 |
| Range | 24–80 | 20–72 |
| Smoking + Chewing | 75 | 22 |
| All Habits | 40 | 26 |
| No habits | 5 | 51 |
| Oral cavity | 52 | — |
| Oropharynx | 43 | — |
| Larynx | 19 | — |
| Nasopharynx | 6 | — |
| N− | 54 | — |
| N+ | 66 | — |
| T1 + T2 | 18 | — |
| T3 + T4 | 102 | — |
| MDSCC | 79 | — |
| WDSCC | 17 | — |
| SCC(Not defined) | 21 | — |
| PDSCC | 3 | — |
SCC: squamous cell carcinoma; WDSCC: well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; MDSCC: moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; PDSCC: poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 1Scatter diagram of mean of proteins concentration in different groups by SPR: (a) sHLA-G, (b) IL-10, (c) IFN-γ.
Figure 2ROC curve analysis: AUC value for sHLA-G to distinguish between HNSCC patients and control.
sHLA-G levels estimation by SPR technology in serum of HNSCC patients and the control establishing its correlation with the therapy, represented as mean ± SD.
| Control Group (n = 99) (ng/ul) | Study Group (n = 120) | p-value | Study Group (n = 72) | Study Group (n = 72) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 6.56 ± 1.21 (78) | 8.24 ± 1.74 (107) | 8.16 ± 1.86 (64) | 6.59 ± 1.31 (64) | ||
| Female | 6.10 ± 1.61 (21)* | 7.81 ± 1.76 (13) | 7.51 ± 1.04 (08) | 7.03 ± 1.55 (08) | 0.474 | |
| <50 yrs | 6.56 ± 1.35 (60) | 8.36 ± 1.52 (64) | 8.05 ± 1.30 (32) | 6.68 ± 1.29 (32) | ||
| >50 yrs | 6.42 ± 1.30 (39) | 8.01 ± 1.97 (56) | 8.12 ± 2.13 (40)* | 6.61 ± 1.40 (40) | ||
| Smoking + Chewing | 6.15 ± 1.13 (22) | 8.20 ± 1.56 (75) | 8.05 ± 1.51 (43) | 6.60 ± 1.41 (43) | ||
| All Habits | 6.92 ± 1.37 (26) | 8.24 ± 1.90 (40) | 8.17 ± 2.96 (26)* | 6.62 ± 1.30 (26) | ||
| No habits | 6.34 ± 1.31 (51) | 7.65 ± 0.78 (05) | 0.112 | 7.96 ± 0.77 (03) | 7.36 ± 0.72 (03) | 0.538 |
| Oral Cavity | — | 8.21 ± 1.51 (52) | — | 7.79 ± 1.13 (25) | 7.22 ± 1.10 (25) | |
| Oropharynx | — | 7.94 ± 1.45 (43) | — | 7.90 ± 1.24 (27) | 6.10 ± 1.33 (27) | |
| Larynx | — | 8.62 ± 2.54 (19) | — | 8.76 ± 2.43 (15)* | 6.71 ± 1.52 (15) | |
| Nasopharynx | — | 8.54 ± 2.68 (06) | — | 8.69 ± 2.41 (05)* | 6.46 ± 1.58 (05) | 0.222 |
| N− | — | 7.73 ± 1.12 (54) | — | 7.60 ± 1.04 (37) | 6.62 ± 1.42 (37) | |
| N+ | — | 8.58 ± 2.06 (66) | — | 8.62 ± 1.45 (35) | 6.66 ± 1.26 (35) | |
| T1 + T2 | — | 7.90 ± 1.25 (18) | — | 7.70 ± 1.01 (11) | 6.72 ± 1.50 (11) | 0.0930 |
| T3 + T4 | — | 7.65 ± 1.82 (102) | — | 8.16 ± 1.91 (61) | 6.63 ± 1.32 (61) | |
| MDSCC | 8.32 ± 1.91 (79) | — | 8.34 ± 2.07 (47) | 6.58 ± 1.46 (47) | ||
| WDSCC | 7.93 ± 1.25 (17) | — | 7.78 ± 1.20 (07) | 7.38 ± 1.34 (07) | 0.479 | |
| SCC (Not defined) | 7.95 ± 1.54 (21) | — | 7.44 ± 1.01 (15) | 6.68 ± 1.39 (15) | 0.051 | |
| PDSCC | 8.14 ± 0.61 (03) | — | 8.14 ± 0.62 (03) | 5.65 ± 0.27 (03) | ||
*Non-parametric measures analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test **p ≤ 0.05 considered to be significant; N− node absent, N+ node involvement; MDSCC Moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; WDSCC widely differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; SCC squamous cell carcinoma; PDSCC poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 3Estimation of proteins in different groups through ELISA (a) sHLA-G, (b) IL-10, (c) IFN-γ.
Figure 4Real time PCR analysis mRNA fold change: (a) HLA-G (b) IL-10, (c) IFN-γ.
Figure 5Scatter plot of correlation studies between (a) sHLA-G and IL-10 and (b) sHLA-G and IFN-γ.