Literature DB >> 32123139

Exposure to secondhand aerosol of electronic cigarettes in indoor settings in 12 European countries: data from the TackSHS survey.

Beladenta Amalia1,2,3,4, Xiaoqiu Liu5, Alessandra Lugo5, Marcela Fu1,2,3,4, Anna Odone6, Piet A van den Brandt7, Sean Semple8, Luke Clancy9, Joan B Soriano4,10, Esteve Fernández11,2,3,4, Silvano Gallus5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to secondhand aerosol from e-cigarette (SHA) may pose harmful effects to bystanders. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, duration and determinants of SHA exposure in various indoor settings in 12 European countries.
METHODS: In 2017-2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study, the TackSHS survey, on a representative sample of the population aged ≥15 years in 12 European countries (Bulgaria, England, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Spain). We described the prevalence and duration of exposure to SHA in several indoor settings among 11 604 e-cigarette non-users. Individual-level and country-level characteristics associated with SHA exposure were also explored using multilevel logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, 16.0% of e-cigarette non-users were exposed to SHA in any indoor setting at least weekly, ranging from 4.3% in Spain to 29.6% in England. The median duration of SHA exposure among those who were exposed was 43 min/day. 'Other indoor settings' (eg, bar and restaurant) was reported as the place where most of e-cigarette non-users were exposed (8.3%), followed by workplace/educational venues (6.4%), home (5.8%), public transportation (3.5%) and private transportation (2.7%). SHA exposure was more likely to occur in certain groups of non-users: men, younger age groups, those with higher level of education, e-cigarette past users, current smokers, those perceiving SHA harmless and living in countries with a higher e-cigarette use prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS: We found inequalities of SHA exposure across and within European countries. Governments should consider extending their tobacco smoke-free legislation to e-cigarettes to protect bystanders, particularly vulnerable populations such as young people. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02928536. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic nicotine delivery devices; environment; secondhand smoke; surveillance and monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32123139     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  4 in total

Review 1.  E-Cigarette Toxicology.

Authors:  Terry Gordon; Emma Karey; Meghan E Rebuli; Yael-Natalie H Escobar; Ilona Jaspers; Lung Chi Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 16.459

2.  E-Cigarette Use among Current Smokers Experiencing Homelessness.

Authors:  Arturo Durazo; Marlena Hartman-Filson; Holly Elser; Natalie M Alizaga; Maya Vijayaraghavan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Reaping what you sow: England's drastic reduction in childhood secondhand smoke exposure in two decades.

Authors:  Silvano Gallus; Esteve Fernandez
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-02-28

4.  Smoking cessation behaviors and reasons for use of electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products among Romanian adults.

Authors:  Sumaira Hussain; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.