Literature DB >> 32122921

Genomic Variants of Cytarabine Sensitivity Associated with Treatment-Related Mortality in Pediatric AML: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Christine L Phillips1,2, Adam Lane3, Robert B Gerbing4, Todd A Alonzo5, Alyss Wilkey2, Gretchen Radloff2, Beverly Lange6, Eric R Gamazon7,8, M Eileen Dolan9, Stella M Davies10,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cytarabine is an effective treatment for AML with associated toxicities including treatment related mortality (TRM). The purpose is to determine the clinical relevance of SNPs identified through the use of HapMap lymphoblastoid cell-based models, in predicting cytarabine response and toxicity in AML. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We tested clinical significance of SNPs associated with cytarabine sensitivity in children with AML treated on Children's Oncology Group regimens (CCG 2941/2961). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and TRM. Patients who received bone marrow transplant were excluded. We tested 124 SNPs associated with cytarabine sensitivity in HapMap cell lines in 348 children to determine whether any associated with treatment outcomes. In addition, we tested five SNPs previously associated with TRM in children with AML in our independent dataset of 385 children.
RESULTS: Homozygous variant genotypes of rs2025501 and rs6661575 had increased in vitro cellular sensitivity to cytarabine and were associated with increased TRM. TRM was particularly increased in children with variant genotype randomized to high-dose cytarabine (rs2025501: P = 0.0024 and rs6661575 P = 0.0188). In analysis of previously reported SNPs, only the variant genotype rs17202778 C/C was significantly associated with TRM (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We report clinical importance of two SNPs not previously associated with cytarabine toxicity. Moreover, we confirm that SNP rs17202778 significantly impacts TRM in pediatric AML. Cytarabine sensitivity genotypes may predict TRM and could be used to stratify to standard versus high-dose cytarabine regimens, warranting further study in prospective AML trials. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32122921      PMCID: PMC7722896          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  25 in total

1.  Long-term results of children with acute myeloid leukemia: a report of three consecutive Phase III trials by the Children's Cancer Group: CCG 251, CCG 213 and CCG 2891.

Authors:  F O Smith; T A Alonzo; R B Gerbing; W G Woods; R J Arceci
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  High-dose cytosine arabinoside in the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  N Cole; B E Gibson
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  In vitro resistance to cytosine arabinoside, not to daunorubicin, is associated with the risk of relapse in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  E Klumper; G J Ossenkoppele; R Pieters; D R Huismans; A H Loonen; A Rottier; G Westra; A J Veerman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Outcomes in CCG-2961, a children's oncology group phase 3 trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Beverly J Lange; Franklin O Smith; James Feusner; Dorothy R Barnard; Patricia Dinndorf; Stephen Feig; Nyla A Heerema; Carola Arndt; Robert J Arceci; Nita Seibel; Margie Weiman; Kathryn Dusenbery; Kevin Shannon; Sandra Luna-Fineman; Robert B Gerbing; Todd A Alonzo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Population-specific genetic variants important in susceptibility to cytarabine arabinoside cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Christine M Hartford; Shiwei Duan; Shannon M Delaney; Shuangli Mi; Emily O Kistner; Jatinder K Lamba; R Stephanie Huang; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Cytidine deaminase genotype and toxicity of cytosine arabinoside therapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Deepika Bhatla; Robert B Gerbing; Todd A Alonzo; Heather Conner; Julie A Ross; Soheil Meshinchi; Xiaowen Zhai; Tiffany Zamzow; Parinda A Mehta; Hartmut Geiger; John Perentesis; Stella M Davies
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Pilot study of idarubicin-based intensive-timing induction therapy for children with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: Children's Cancer Group Study 2941.

Authors:  Beverly J Lange; Patricia Dinndorf; Franklin O Smith; Carola Arndt; Dorothy Barnard; Stephen Feig; James Feusner; Nita Seibel; Margie Weiman; Richard Aplenc; Robert Gerbing; Todd A Alonzo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 mediates in vitro cytarabine sensitivity in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  I Hubeek; R W Stam; G J Peters; R Broekhuizen; J P P Meijerink; E R van Wering; B E S Gibson; U Creutzig; C M Zwaan; J Cloos; D J Kuik; R Pieters; G J L Kaspers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  The role of fibromodulin in cancer pathogenesis: implications for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Pourhanifeh; Rezvan Mohammadi; Somaye Noruzi; Seyede Atefe Hosseini; Sahar Fanoudi; Yousef Mohamadi; Milad Hashemzehi; Zatollah Asemi; Hamid Reza Mirzaei; Reza Salarinia; Hamed Mirzaei
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.722

10.  CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome.

Authors:  Philipp Rentzsch; Daniela Witten; Gregory M Cooper; Jay Shendure; Martin Kircher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.