Amelia J Lake1,2, Jessica L Hateley-Browne3,4, Gwyneth Rees5,6, Jane Speight3,4,7. 1. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. alake@acbrd.org.au. 2. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, 3000, Australia. alake@acbrd.org.au. 3. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia. 4. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, 3000, Australia. 5. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, 3002, Australia. 6. Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia. 7. AHP Research, Hornchurch, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Young adults with type 2 diabetes (aged 18-39 years) are at risk of early onset and rapid progression of diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of blindness and vision loss in working age adults. Early detection via retinal screening can prevent most vision loss, yet screening rates are consistently lower among this priority population than the general diabetes population. We aimed to test the effect of a tailored, evidence-based brief health behaviour change intervention (leaflet) on self-reported screening uptake, and previously identified social cognitive determinants of retinal screening. METHODS: A pragmatic, two-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted from September 2014 to April 2015. Participants were stratified by prior screening uptake (Yes/No) and randomly allocated to intervention (leaflet) or 'usual care' control (no leaflet). Primary outcome was self-reported screening uptake four weeks post-intervention for 'No' participants who had not previously screened for diabetic retinopathy. Secondary outcome variables were changes in knowledge, attitudes, normative beliefs, intention and behavioural skills for all participants, irrespective of prior screening behaviour. To assess intervention effects on secondary outcome variables, we conducted independent samples t-tests (two-tailed) on pre-post change scores. RESULTS:129 young adults (26% no prior retinal screen) completed baseline; 101 completed post-intervention. Power to determine effect on the primary outcome was curtailed by low recruitment of individuals with no prior retinal screen and loss to follow-up. Attrition was associated significantly with country of birth, language spoken at home, and marital status. Significant intervention effect was observed for one secondary outcome variable: knowledge of diabetic retinopathy (p = .03) with moderate effect (partial eta squared η2 = .05); no adverse effects were reported. Control group participants received the leaflet at study completion. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that a well-designed eye health and retinal screening promotion leaflet can increase knowledge of diabetic retinopathy, an important screening predictor. The study highlights the challenges of conducting 'real-world' health behaviour change research with this priority population, providing insights for clinicians and researchers. Strategies to recruit, engage and retain hard-to-reach populations are discussed including nonconventional alternatives to randomised controlled trial designs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614001110673, UTN No.: U1111-1161-9803. Registered 20 October 2014 - retrospectively registered https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=367127.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Young adults with type 2 diabetes (aged 18-39 years) are at risk of early onset and rapid progression of diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of blindness and vision loss in working age adults. Early detection via retinal screening can prevent most vision loss, yet screening rates are consistently lower among this priority population than the general diabetes population. We aimed to test the effect of a tailored, evidence-based brief health behaviour change intervention (leaflet) on self-reported screening uptake, and previously identified social cognitive determinants of retinal screening. METHODS: A pragmatic, two-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted from September 2014 to April 2015. Participants were stratified by prior screening uptake (Yes/No) and randomly allocated to intervention (leaflet) or 'usual care' control (no leaflet). Primary outcome was self-reported screening uptake four weeks post-intervention for 'No' participants who had not previously screened for diabetic retinopathy. Secondary outcome variables were changes in knowledge, attitudes, normative beliefs, intention and behavioural skills for all participants, irrespective of prior screening behaviour. To assess intervention effects on secondary outcome variables, we conducted independent samples t-tests (two-tailed) on pre-post change scores. RESULTS: 129 young adults (26% no prior retinal screen) completed baseline; 101 completed post-intervention. Power to determine effect on the primary outcome was curtailed by low recruitment of individuals with no prior retinal screen and loss to follow-up. Attrition was associated significantly with country of birth, language spoken at home, and marital status. Significant intervention effect was observed for one secondary outcome variable: knowledge of diabetic retinopathy (p = .03) with moderate effect (partial eta squared η2 = .05); no adverse effects were reported. Control group participants received the leaflet at study completion. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that a well-designed eye health and retinal screening promotion leaflet can increase knowledge of diabetic retinopathy, an important screening predictor. The study highlights the challenges of conducting 'real-world' health behaviour change research with this priority population, providing insights for clinicians and researchers. Strategies to recruit, engage and retain hard-to-reach populations are discussed including nonconventional alternatives to randomised controlled trial designs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614001110673, UTN No.: U1111-1161-9803. Registered 20 October 2014 - retrospectively registered https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=367127.
Entities:
Keywords:
Behavioural medicine; Diabetic retinopathy; Randomised controlled trial; Retinal screening; Type 2 diabetes; Young adults
Authors: Zara Khair; Md Moshiur Rahman; Kana Kazawa; Yasmin Jahan; Abu S G Faruque; Mohammod Jobayer Chisti; Michiko Moriyama Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Louise Prothero; Fabianna Lorencatto; Martin Cartwright; Jennifer M Burr; Philip Gardner; John Anderson; Justin Presseau; Noah Ivers; Jeremy M Grimshaw; John G Lawrenson Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2021-11
Authors: Louise Prothero; John G Lawrenson; Martin Cartwright; Roxanne Crosby-Nwaobi; Jennifer M Burr; Philip Gardner; John Anderson; Justin Presseau; Noah Ivers; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Fabiana Lorencatto Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 4.213