Literature DB >> 32122311

Supporting at-risk older adults transitioning from hospital to home: who benefits from an evidence-based patient-centered discharge planning intervention? Post-hoc analysis from a randomized trial.

Véronique Provencher1, Lindy Clemson2, Kylie Wales3, Ian D Cameron4, Laura N Gitlin5, Ariane Grenier6, Natasha A Lannin7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subgroups of older patients experience difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADL) following hospital discharge, as well as unplanned hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) presentations. We examine whether these subgroups of "at-risk" older patients benefit more than their counterparts from an evidence-based discharge planning intervention, on the following outcomes: (1) independence in ADL, (2) participation in life roles, (3) unplanned re-hospitalizations, and (4) ED presentations. TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS: This study used data from a randomized control trial involving 400 hospitalized older patients with acute and medical conditions, recruited through 5 sites in Australia. Participants receive either HOME, a patient-centered discharge planning intervention led by an occupational therapist; or a structured in-hospital consultation. HOME uses a collaborative approach for goal setting and includes pre and post-discharge home visits as well as telephone follow-up. Characteristics associated with higher risks of adverse outcomes were recorded and at-risk subgroups were created (mild cognitive impairment, walking difficulty, comorbidity, living alone and no support from family). Independence in ADL and participation in life roles were assessed with validated questionnaires. The number of unplanned re-hospitalizations and ED presentations were extracted from medical files. Linear regression models were conducted to detect variation in response to the intervention at 3-months, according to patients' characteristics.
RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant interaction effects for intervention by cognitive status for unplanned re-hospitalization (p = 0.003) and ED presentations (p = 0.021) at 3 months. Within the at-risk subgroup of mild cognitively impaired, the HOME intervention significantly reduced unplanned hospitalizations (p = 0.027), but the effect did not reach significance in ED visits. While the effect of HOME differed according to support received from family for participation in life roles (p = 0.019), the participation observed in HOME patients with no support was not significantly improved.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings show that hospitalized older adults with mild cognitive impairment benefit from the HOME intervention, which involves preparation and post-discharge support in the environment, to reduce unplanned re-hospitalizations. Improved discharge outcomes in this at-risk subgroup following an occupational therapist-led intervention may enable best care delivery as patients transition from hospital to home. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered before commencement (ACTRN12611000615987).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive impairment; Discharge planning; Home visit; Occupational therapy; Older adults; Rehabilitation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32122311     DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1494-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Geriatr        ISSN: 1471-2318            Impact factor:   3.921


  3 in total

Review 1.  Hospital-associated deconditioning: Not only physical, but also cognitive.

Authors:  Yaohua Chen; Arianna Almirall-Sánchez; David Mockler; Emily Adrion; Clara Domínguez-Vivero; Román Romero-Ortuño
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Effects, barriers and facilitators in predischarge home assessments to improve the transition of care from the inpatient care to home in adult patients: an integrative review.

Authors:  Uta Kirchner-Heklau; Kai Krause; Susanne Saal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Effectiveness of a care transitions intervention for older adults discharged home from the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gwen C Jacobsohn; Courtney M C Jones; Rebecca K Green; Amy L Cochran; Thomas V Caprio; Jeremy T Cushman; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Manish N Shah
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.451

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.