Literature DB >> 32122034

Does deep learning always outperform simple linear regression in optical imaging?

Shuming Jiao, Yang Gao, Jun Feng, Ting Lei, Xiaocong Yuan.   

Abstract

Deep learning has been extensively applied in many optical imaging problems in recent years. Despite the success, the limitations and drawbacks of deep learning in optical imaging have been seldom investigated. In this work, we show that conventional linear-regression-based methods can outperform the previously proposed deep learning approaches for two black-box optical imaging problems in some extent. Deep learning demonstrates its weakness especially when the number of training samples is small. The advantages and disadvantages of linear-regression-based methods and deep learning are analyzed and compared. Since many optical systems are essentially linear, a deep learning network containing many nonlinearity functions sometimes may not be the most suitable option.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32122034     DOI: 10.1364/OE.382319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of machine learning and deep learning for view identification from cardiac magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Daksh Chauhan; Emeka Anyanwu; Jacob Goes; Stephanie A Besser; Simran Anand; Ravi Madduri; Neil Getty; Sebastian Kelle; Keigo Kawaji; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Two-step training deep learning framework for computational imaging without physics priors.

Authors:  Ruibo Shang; Kevin Hoffer-Hawlik; Fei Wang; Guohai Situ; Geoffrey P Luke
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Predicting Patient Wait Times by Using Highly Deidentified Data in Mental Health Care: Enhanced Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Amir Rastpour; Carolyn McGregor
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2022-08-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.