INTRODUCTION: Analysis of quality of life (QOL) outcomes is an important aspect of lymphedema treatment since this disease can substantially impact QOL in affected individuals. There are a growing number of studies reporting patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for patients with lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes and utilization of PROMs following surgical treatment of lymphedema. METHODS: A literature search of four databases was performed up to and including March, 2019. Studies included reported on QOL outcomes after physiologic procedures, defined as either lymphovenous bypass (LVB) or vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), to treat upper and/or lower extremity primary or secondary lymphedema. RESULTS: In total, 850 studies were screened-of which, 32 studies were included in this review. Lymphovenous bypass was the surgical intervention in 16 studies, VLNT in 11 studies, and both in 5 studies. Of the 32 total studies, 16 used validated survey tools. The most commonly used PROM was the lymph quality of life measure for limb lymphedema (LYMQOL) (12 studies). In the remaining four studies, the upper limb lymphedema 27 scale (ULL27), the short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), the lymphedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF), and lymphedema life impact scale (LLIS) were each used once. QOL improvement following surgical treatment was noted in all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic surgical treatment of lymphedema results in improved QOL outcomes in most patients. The use of validated PROM tools is increasing but there is no current consensus on use. Future research to evaluate the psychometric properties of PROMs in lymphedema is needed to guide the development and use of lymphedema-specific tools.
INTRODUCTION: Analysis of quality of life (QOL) outcomes is an important aspect of lymphedema treatment since this disease can substantially impact QOL in affected individuals. There are a growing number of studies reporting patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for patients with lymphedema. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes and utilization of PROMs following surgical treatment of lymphedema. METHODS: A literature search of four databases was performed up to and including March, 2019. Studies included reported on QOL outcomes after physiologic procedures, defined as either lymphovenous bypass (LVB) or vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT), to treat upper and/or lower extremity primary or secondary lymphedema. RESULTS: In total, 850 studies were screened-of which, 32 studies were included in this review. Lymphovenous bypass was the surgical intervention in 16 studies, VLNT in 11 studies, and both in 5 studies. Of the 32 total studies, 16 used validated survey tools. The most commonly used PROM was the lymph quality of life measure for limb lymphedema (LYMQOL) (12 studies). In the remaining four studies, the upper limb lymphedema 27 scale (ULL27), the short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), the lymphedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire (Lymph-ICF), and lymphedema life impact scale (LLIS) were each used once. QOL improvement following surgical treatment was noted in all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologic surgical treatment of lymphedema results in improved QOL outcomes in most patients. The use of validated PROM tools is increasing but there is no current consensus on use. Future research to evaluate the psychometric properties of PROMs in lymphedema is needed to guide the development and use of lymphedema-specific tools.
Entities:
Keywords:
lymph node transplant; lymphedema; lymphovenous bypass; patient-reported outcomes; quality of life
Authors: Khairunnisa' Md Yusof; Kira Groen; Rozita Rosli; Maha Abdullah; Rozi Mahmud; Kelly A Avery-Kiejda Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-09-26 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Erik M Verhey; Lyndsay A Kandi; Yeonsoo S Lee; Bryn E Morris; William J Casey; Alanna M Rebecca; Lisa A Marks; Michael A Howard; Chad M Teven Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-10-07
Authors: Michelle Coriddi; Leslie Kim; Leslie McGrath; Elizabeth Encarnacion; Nicholas Brereton; Yin Shen; Andrea V Barrio; Babak Mehrara; Joseph H Dayan Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Louise Marie Beelen; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck; Elena Tsangaris; Michelle Coriddi; Joseph H Dayan; Andrea L Pusic; Anne Klassen; Dalibor Vasilic Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-11-28 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Shan S Qiu; Tim Pruimboom; Anouk J M Cornelissen; Rutger M Schols; Sander M J van Kuijk; René R W J van der Hulst Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Nicholas R Jarvis; Ricardo A Torres; Francisco R Avila; Antonio J Forte; Alanna M Rebecca; Chad M Teven Journal: Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Alan R Tom; Elizabeth Boudiab; Christopher Issa; Kristine Huynh; Stephen Lu; Jeremy M Powers; Kongkrit Chaiyasate Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-06-16