| Literature DB >> 32120803 |
Fausto Petrelli1, Diego Signorelli2, Michele Ghidini3, Antonio Ghidini4, Elio Gregory Pizzutilo5, Lorenzo Ruggieri5, Mary Cabiddu1, Karen Borgonovo1, Giuseppina Dognini6, Matteo Brighenti7, Alessandro De Toma2, Erika Rijavec3, Marina Chiara Garassino2, Francesco Grossi3, Gianluca Tomasello5.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can elicit toxicities by inhibiting negative regulators of adaptive immunity. Sometimes, management of toxicities may require systemic glucocorticoids. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the correlation between steroids use, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in cancer patients treated with ICIs. Publications that compared steroids with non-steroid users in cancer patients treated with ICIs from inception to June 2019 were identified by searching the EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Patients (studies, n = 16; patients, n = 4045) taking steroids were at increased risk of death and progression compared to those not taking steroids (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.24-1.91; p = 0.01 and HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.02-1.76; p = 0.03, respectively). The main negative effect on OS was associated with patients taking steroids for supportive care (HR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.41-4.43; p < 0.01) or brain metastases (HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.87; p < 0.01). In contrast, steroids used to mitigate adverse events did not negatively affect OS. In conclusion, caution is needed when steroids are used for symptom control. In these patients, a negative impact of steroid use was observed for both OS and PFS.Entities:
Keywords: Immunotherapy; immune-related adverse events; meta-analysis; prognosis; steroids
Year: 2020 PMID: 32120803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639