| Literature DB >> 32120377 |
Scott M Gordon1,2, Lakshmi Srinivasan3,4, Deanne M Taylor4,5, Stephen R Master6,7, Marissa A Tremoglie3, Adriana Hankeova3, Dustin D Flannery3,4,8, Soraya Abbasi4,8, Julie C Fitzgerald9,10, Mary C Harris3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of bacterial meningitis (BM) is challenging in newborn infants. Presently, biomarkers of BM have limited diagnostic accuracy. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metabolites may be a useful diagnostic tool in BM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32120377 PMCID: PMC7390682 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-0816-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Res ISSN: 0031-3998 Impact factor: 3.756
Demographic data for enrolled infants with culture-proven bacterial meningitis and uninfected infants without meningitis.
P values were calculated with Graphpad Prism 7 using the Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square, or Fisher’s exact test, as applicable. BM: bacterial meningitis, IQR: interquartile range, VP: ventriculo-peritoneal, WBC: white blood cell count, RBC: red blood cell count.
| Variables | BM ( | Uninfected ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age, weeks+days, median (IQR) | 35w6d (27w0d-38w0d) | 35w0d (26w5d-38w0d) | >0.99 |
| Postnatal age, days, median (IQR) | 40 (21-57) | 44 (30-65) | 0.86 |
| Birthweight, grams, median (IQR) | 2211 (905-3160) | 2210 (640-3090) | 0.73 |
| Preterm (<37 weeks gestation), | 13 (68%) | 13 (68%) | >0.99 |
| Male sex, | 11 (58%) | 13 (68%) | 0.74 |
| Race/Ethnicity, | 0.78 | ||
| Black, non-Hispanic | 8 (42%) | 6 (32%) | |
| White, non-Hispanic | 9 (47%) | 11 (58%) | |
| Other (Hispanic, Asian, or unknown) | 2 (11%) | 2 (10%) | |
| VP shunt or Ommaya reservoir, | 9 (47%) | 1 (5%) | 0.0078 |
| Culture-proven bacteremia, | 7 (37%) | 2 (10%) | 0.12 |
| CSF WBC (cells/mm3), median (IQR) | 215 (57-923) | 2 (0-4) | <0.0001 |
| CSF Glucose (g/dL), median (IQR) | 31 (20-46) | 52 (42-64) | <0.0001 |
| CSF Protein (g/dL), median (IQR) | 317 (171-709) | 76 (43-122) | <0.0001 |
| CSF RBC (cells/mm3), median (IQR) | 124 (29-2870) | 15 (3-623) | 0.042 |
| Greater than 500 cells/mm3 RBC, | 9 (47%) | 5 (26%) | 0.19 |
Figure 1.Many individual metabolites in CSF differ between infants with bacterial meningitis and uninfected infants.
(a) Heat map in which columns represent individual compounds that significantly differ (adjusted p<0.05) between infants with BM and uninfected infants. Columns highlighted in red represent compounds significantly increased. Columns highlighted in green represent compounds significantly decreased. Rows represent individual subjects with BM (red text) and uninfected infants (black text). Samples are organized by Euclidian clustering based on levels of all significantly different compounds. (b) Multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) plot of uninfected infants (black dots) and infants with BM (red dots), organized by random forests based on levels of all 422 detected metabolites. Points closer together indicate similarity in levels of metabolites, while points farther apart indicate dissimilarity. Points in the left hemisphere of the plot are predicted to be uninfected infants. Points in the right hemisphere of the plot are predicted to have BM. (c) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for random forests modeling of disease status and 10-fold cross-validation with 3 repeats. Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94.
Figure 2.A focused metabolic signature associated with BM in our cohort of infants.
(a) Each point represents an individual AUC value (y-axis) of a predictive model using a progressively larger number of metabolites (x-axis). The highest AUC of 0.97 is seen using either the top 6 or top 9 metabolites to distinguish infants with BM from uninfected infants. (b) Standard box and whisker plots showing relative levels of the 9 compounds composing the optimal signature to distinguish uninfected infants from those with BM. Individual p values are: proline (p=0.000003); N6-AL, N6-acetyllysine (p=0.000008); taurine (p=0.00001); cytidine (p=0.000001); 2-HG, 2-hydroxygluatarate (p=0.0002); ornithine (p=0.0002); thymine (p=0.000007); glutamate (p=0.000003); and αKG, α-ketoglutarate (p=0.000007).
Figure 3.Secondary metabolites associated with Group B Streptococcal meningitis.
(a) Standard box and whisker plots showing relative levels of the 3 individual compounds whose levels significantly differ between infants with GBS BM and infants with non-GBS BM. Individual adjusted p values are: α-hydroxyisocaproic acid (HICA, p=0.02), 2-hydroxy-3-methylvaleric acid (HMVA, p=0.02), and sucrose p=0.03. (b) 3-dimensional plot shows clustering of infants with GBS BM and non-GBS BM based on levels of HICA, HMVA, and sucrose. Blue dots represent individuals with GBS BM, and red dots represent individuals with non-GBS BM.
Figure 4.Families of metabolites distinguish subjects with BM from uninfected infants.
All compounds significantly altered (increased or decreased) between subjects with BM and uninfected infants were subjected to pathway analysis using MetaboAnalyst. All pathways found to be significantly over-represented among metabolites enriched in BM are shown. For each pathway, corresponding p values adjusted for the false discovery rate (FDR) are shown on the right-hand axis. The number of metabolites matched to each pathway are shown in white, embedded within bars depicting the impact score of each pathway. A higher impact score signifies that perturbations in matched compounds are likely to have a greater impact on the performance of the overall pathway.