| Literature DB >> 32120152 |
Katarzyna Szewczuk-Karpisz1, Piotr Nowicki2, Zofia Sokołowska3, Robert Pietrzak2.
Abstract
The main aim of the study was to compare the sorption capacity of hay-based activated biochars, obtained using conventional and microwave furnance, relative to copper(II) ions and ionic polyacrylamides (PAM). Surface properties of the solids were characterized by, inter alia, N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm method, whereas their tendency to aggregation was established turbidimetrically. Adsorption capacity of biochars were performed in the simple and mixed Cu(II)/PAM systems, i.e. the examined suspensions contained one or two adsorbates at the same time. The results indicated that biochar prepared in microwave furnance was characterized by larger micropore area and, as a result, it had higher adsorption capacity relative to Cu(II) ions. At pH 6, when the initial Cu(II) concentration equaled 100 mg/L, the biochar obtained by microwave heating adsorbed 81.5% of Cu(II) ions, whereas the one obtained by conventional heating - 51.6%. Due to high molecular weight, the PAM macromolecules could not penetrate the biochar micropores and thus the polymer adsorbed amounts were similar for both materials. For initial polymer concentration equal to 100 mg/L, the solids adsorbed 65-66.2% of cationic PAM containing 25% of quaternary amine groups. In the mixed system of anionic polyacrylamide and Cu(II) ions, the formation of Cu(II)-PAM complexes occurred, which favored both heavy metal and polymer adsorption on the solid surface. On the other hand, cationic polyacrylamide and heavy metal ions made the contact with the solid difficult for each other. What is more, ionic polyacrylamide and copper(II) ions stimulated the biochar aggregation due to surface charge neutralization and flocculation.Entities:
Keywords: Activated biochar; Adsorption modeling; Conventional and microwave heating; Cu(II)-PAM complexes; Flocculation; Solid porosity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32120152 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemosphere ISSN: 0045-6535 Impact factor: 7.086