| Literature DB >> 32118135 |
Juan Cheng1,2, Ying Liu3, Lingyun He4, Weiwei Liu1,2, Yuli Chen1,2, Fengqiu Liu1,2, Yuan Guo1,2, Haitao Ran1,2, Lu Yang3.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the major diseases that threaten women's health. Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most common metastatic path of breast cancer. Finding a simple, effective, and safe strategy to eliminate metastatic tumors in LNs is highly desired for clinical use. Carbon nanoparticles (CNs), as an LN tracer, have been widely used in the clinical setting. In addition, previous experiments have confirmed that CNs have good photoacoustic imaging and photothermal effects. In this study, we used CNs as a photothermal conversion material and drug carrier, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) as a film-forming material, and docetaxel as a chemotherapy drug to prepare multifunctional nanoparticles (DOC-CNPs). The prepared DOC-CNPs present as a black solution, which shows smooth spherical particles under light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and they have a good ability for liquid-gas phase transition, good dispersibility, high drug-loading capacity, and low cytotoxicity. In vitro, they can release drugs and inhibit tumor cells after laser irradiation. The photoacoustic (PA) signal intensity and the photothermal conversion efficiency increased with an increase in the concentration of DOC-CNPs. In vivo, after administration, the DOC-CNPs reached the LNs. After laser irradiation, the DOC-CNPs absorbed laser energy, and the temperature of the LNs increased high enough to achieve photothermal therapy under PA and ultrasound monitoring. Fracture of the DOC-CNPs was caused by the liquid-gas phase transition with the increased temperature, and the ruptured DOC-CNPs released docetaxel to achieve targeted chemotherapy. These findings suggested that DOC-CNPs can achieve precise treatment for metastatic LNs of breast cancer with PA and ultrasound visualization.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32118135 PMCID: PMC7045339 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a–d) Synthesis process of DOC-CNPs. (e–g) Mechanism of DOC-CNPs after injection and laser irradiation.
Figure 2(a) Prepared DOC-CNPs appeared as a black suspension. (b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of a CNP. Black granular CNs and PFH were mixed and encapsulated in a white poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) shell. (c1, c2) Optical microscopic images of the DOC-CNPs before and after laser irradiation. (d) ζ-Potential of the DOC-CNPs. (e) Size of the DOC-CNPs.
Figure 3(a) Standard light absorption curve of carbon nanoparticles (CNs). (b) Standard light curve of docetaxel (DOC). (c) Cumulative release rate (CRR) of DOC from DOC-CNPs with or without laser irradiation.
Figure 4(a1) Photoacoustic (PA) signals of DOC-CNPs at different concentrations in vitro. (a2) Quantitative analysis of the PA signal intensity of concentrations in (a1) (*P < 0.05). (b1) All concentrations of DOC-CNPs reached 50 °C after laser irradiation in vitro. (b2) Time required for different concentrations of DOC, which reached 50 °C after laser irradiation in vitro. (c) Temperature variation curve of DOC-CNPs with/without irradiation for 3 cycles in vitro. The error bars represent mean ± SD for n = 3.
Figure 5(a) Cytotoxicity results of DOC-CNPs on human breast epithelial cells (HUVEC) (mean ± standard deviation for different concentrations of DOC-CNPs). (b) Apoptosis index of different groups after laser exposure (*P < 0.05).
Figure 6(a1) PA signals of the DOC-CNPs at different concentrations in vivo. (a2) Quantitative analysis of the PA signal intensity of concentrations in (a1) (*P < 0.05). (b1) All concentrations of DOC-CNPs reached different maximum temperatures after laser irradiation in vivo. (b2) Different concentrations of DOC-CNPs reached different maximum temperatures after laser irradiation in vivo. (c) Temperature variation curve of DOC-CNPs with/without irradiation for three cycles in vivo. The error bars represent mean ± SD for n = 3.
Figure 7(a1) Images of the isolated lymph nodes (LNs) in different groups after treatment. (a2) Changes of LN volumes before and after treatment in different groups (*P < 0.05). (b1) Images of the pathological changes after treatment. (b2) Apoptotic rate of LNs in different groups (*P < 0.05).
Figure 8(a) Images of the blood flow (CDFI, color Doppler flow imaging) in different groups after treatment. (b1) Images of electrography after treatment. (b2) Changes of the shear wave velocity before and after treatment in different groups (*P < 0.05).
Adler grade of lymph nodes before and after treatmenta
| Adler
grade | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| group | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| CT1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| CT2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| LA1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| LA2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| DC1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| DC2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| CNP + LA1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| CNP + LA2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| DC + LA1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| DC + LA2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Note: (1) Before treatment, (2) after treatment.
There was no significant difference before treatment compared with other groups (P > 0.05).
Compared with other groups, the difference after treatment was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Liver Function, Renal Function, and Routine Blood Test of Rabbits after 7 Days of Treatmenta
| routine
blood test | liver
function | renal
function | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| group | WBC (109/L) | RBC (1012/L) | HB (g/L) | PLT (109/L) | AST (IU/L) | ALT (IU/L) | scr (μmol/L) | BUN (mmol/L) | ||||||||
| CT | 5.68 ± 0.61 | 6.08 ± 0.92 | 126.4 ± 26.2 | 398.5 ± 50.4 | 42.66 ± 18.32 | 40.25 ± 12.44 | 103.6 ± 14.7 | 14.54 ± 1.75 | ||||||||
| LA | 6.74 ± 0.77 | 0.113 | 6.65 ± 0.87 | 0.376 | 135.6 ± 9.2 | 0.782 | 426.2 ± 71.1 | 0.520 | 37.26 ± 12.91 | 0.137 | 48.58 ± 11.92 | 0.319 | 100.1 ± 18.8 | 0.586 | 16.26 ± 2.89 | 0.256 |
| DC | 8.02 ± 0.94 | 0.246 | 6.32 ± 1.24 | 0.154 | 122.7 ± 13.1 | 0.731 | 466.9 ± 80.5 | 0.784 | 39.18 ± 10.15 | 0.487 | 46.83 ± 14.39 | 0.281 | 109.5 ± 16.9 | 0.635 | 16.34 ± 3.02 | 0.343 |
| CNP + LA | 7.66 ± 0.82 | 0.209 | 6.27 ± 0.99 | 0.221 | 130 ± 11.4 | 0.719 | 458.7 ± 74.6 | 0.732 | 43.34 ± 16.98 | 0.277 | 42.31 ± 11.25 | 0.189 | 111.7 ± 20.9 | 0.678 | 15.59 ± 2.14 | 0.227 |
| DC + LA | 8.17 ± 0.89 | 0.318 | 6.40 ± 1.06 | 0.289 | 128.8 ± 17.0 | 0.675 | 450.1 ± 72.7 | 0.669 | 47.34 ± 19.82 | 0.350 | 39.19 ± 10.92 | 0.126 | 116.2 ± 25.4 | 0.742 | 15.73 ± 1.92 | 0.198 |
Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; Plt, Platelet; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Cr, creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.