Peixia Wang1,2,3, Tao Wang4, Juanji Hong2, Xiyun Yan1,3, Minmin Liang2. 1. CAS Engineering Laboratory for Nanozyme, Key Laboratory of Protein and Peptide Pharmaceutical, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 2. Experimental Center of Advanced Materials School of Materials Science & Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. 3. College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Abstract
Nanozymes are nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-like properties. They can specifically catalyze substrates of natural enzymes under physiological condition with similar catalytic mechanism and kinetics. Compared to natural enzymes, nanozymes exhibit the unique advantages including high catalytic activity, low cost, high stability, easy mass production, and tunable activity. In addition, as a new type of artificial enzymes, nanozymes not only have the enzyme-like catalytic activity, but also exhibit the unique physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, such as photothermal properties, superparamagnetism, and fluorescence, etc. By combining the unique physicochemical properties and enzyme-like catalytic activities, nanozymes have been widely developed for in vitro detection and in vivo disease monitoring and treatment. Here we mainly summarized the applications of nanozymes for disease imaging and detection to explore their potential application in disease diagnosis and precision medicine.
Nanozymes are nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-like properties. They can specifically catalyze substrates of natural enzymes under physiological condition with similar catalytic mechanism and kinetics. Compared to natural enzymes, nanozymes exhibit the unique advantages including high catalytic activity, low cost, high stability, easy mass production, and tunable activity. In addition, as a new type of artificial enzymes, nanozymes not only have the enzyme-like catalytic activity, but also exhibit the unique physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, such as photothermal properties, superparamagnetism, and fluorescence, etc. By combining the unique physicochemical properties and enzyme-like catalytic activities, nanozymes have been widely developed for in vitro detection and in vivo disease monitoring and treatment. Here we mainly summarized the applications of nanozymes for disease imaging and detection to explore their potential application in disease diagnosis and precision medicine.
Nanozyme is a new type of artificial enzyme with intrinsic enzyme-like characteristics. In 2007, we reported the landmark paper that Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) have intrinsic peroxidase-like activity (Gao et al., 2007), and since that time nanozymes have increasingly attracted attention from a broad spectrum of scientists and technologists because of their high catalytic activity, low cost, and high stability (Gao and Yan, 2016). To date, there are more than 300 types of nanomaterials that have been found to possess the intrinsic enzyme-like activity, including the peroxidase activity of Fe3O4 (Gao et al., 2007), Co3O4 (Mu et al., 2012), CuO (Liu et al., 2014), V2O5 (André et al., 2011), MnFeO3 (Chi et al., 2018), FeS (Dai et al., 2009), graphene quantum dots (Nirala et al., 2017), CeO2 (Xue et al., 2012), BiFeO3 (Wei et al., 2010), CoFe2O4 (He et al., 2010), FeTe (Roy et al., 2012), gold@carbon dots (Zheng et al., 2016); oxidase activity of Au (Comotti et al., 2004), Pt (Yu et al., 2014), CoFe2O4 (Zhang et al., 2013), MnO2 (Xing et al., 2012), CuO NPs (Hu et al., 2017) and NiCo2O4 (Su et al., 2017); catalase activity of CeO2 NPs (Talib et al., 2010), Pt-Ft NPs (Fan et al., 2011), Ir NPs (Su et al., 2015), MoS2 nanosheets (Chen et al., 2018), Prussian Blue NPs (Zhang W. et al., 2016); superoxide oxidase activity of CeO2 (Tarnuzzer et al., 2005), Fullerene (Ali et al., 2004), FePO4 microflowers (Wang W. et al., 2012), Gly-Cu (OH)2 NPs (Korschelt et al., 2017), N-PCNs (Fan et al., 2018); haloperoxidase activity of V2O5 nanowire (Natalio et al., 2012), CeO2x Nanorods (Herget et al., 2017); sulfite oxidase activity of MoO3 NPs (Ragg et al., 2014); phosphatase activity of CeO2 (Kuchma et al., 2010), Fe2O3 NPs (Huang, 2018); phosphotriesterase activity of Co3O4/GO nanocomposites (Wang et al., 2017), CeO2 NPs (Vernekar et al., 2016), MOF-808 (M = Zr) (Mondal and Holdt, 2016), UiO-66@LiOtBu (M = Zr) (Mondal and Holdt, 2016); CO oxidase activity of Cu2O@CeO2 core@shell nanocubes (Wang et al., 2015); chymotrypsin activity of Cr-MIL-101 (Nath et al., 2016); G-selective DNA cleaving activity of fullerene carboxylic acid (Tokuyama et al., 1993); protease activity of Cu-MOF (Li et al., 2014); restriction endonuclease activity of CdTe NPs (Sun et al., 2018); carbonic anhydrase activity of Co-BBP@Tb-MOF (Sahoo et al., 2013), etc. With the emergence of the new concept of “nanozymology” (Jiang B. et al., 2018), “Nanozymes” have now become an emerging new field bridging nanotechnology and biology.As a new type of promising artificial enzymes, nanozymes have shown a broad spectrum of applications because of their obvious advantages including high stability, high catalytic activity, low cost, large surface area for functionalization, and tunable activity. In particular, by combining their unique physicochemical properties (such as fluorescence, X-ray absorption, and paramagnetic properties, etc.), nanozymes have been widely explored from in vitro detection (Leng et al., 2009; Liang et al., 2010; Roy et al., 2012) to in vivo disease imaging and therapy (Hyon Bin et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2012; Kwon et al., 2016; Singh et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2018). In this review, we summarized the progress of nanozymes in disease detection and imaging, and discussed the current challenges and future directions of nanozyme development in disease imaging and diagnosis.
Nanozymes for Pathological Disease Diagnosis
Peroxidase nanozymes catalyze the oxidation of colorimetric substrates, such as 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), diazo-aminobenzene (DAB), and o-phenylenediamine (OPD), to give a color reaction that can be used for imaging the recognized biomarkers within tissue sections for pathological disease diagnosis (Figure 1A). In 2012, Our group developed a magnetoferritin nanozyme (M-HFn) which is composed of a recombinant human heavy-chain ferritin (HFn) protein nanocage encapsulated an iron oxide nanocore for tumor targeting and imaging (Fan et al., 2012). HFn nanocage specifically recognized tumor cells via binding to overexpressed transferrin receptor1 (TfR1) in tumor cells. Iron oxide nanocores catalyzed the oxidation of color substrates in the presence of H2O2 to produce an intense color reaction for visualizing tumor tissues. We examined 474 clinical human specimens including 247 clinical tumor tissues and 227 normal tissues and demonstrated that M-HFn nanozymes could identify nine types of cancer cells with a specificity of over 95% and sensitivity of 98%. The concentration of M-HFn was 1.8 μM, and the reactive time was 1 h for DAB staining (Figure 1B). Likewise, Gu’s groups developed avastin antibody-functionalized Co3O4 nanozymes as target-specific peroxidase mimics for immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in tumor tissues and the concentration of Ab-Co3O4 was 15 μg/ml, 100 μL, and the reactive time was 30 min for DAB staining (Dong et al., 2014). Due to the high peroxidase-like activity, Co3O4 nanozyme has been proved to be a potential label in place of natural enzymes. So far, numerous of peroxidase nanozyme-based staining methods have been developed for pathological diagnosis of breast cancer, colorectal, stomach, and pancreas (Zhang T. et al., 2016), hepatocellular carcinoma (Hu et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2019), esophageal cancer (Wu et al., 2011), and bladder cancer (Peng et al., 2019).
Cytological examination is an important means of clinical disease diagnosis (Bromberg et al., 2007; Mosterd et al., 2008; Hao et al., 2011; Venugopal and Prasad, 2015). Exfoliated cells from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, spinal fluid, chest water and mucous liquid can provide a large amount of clinical information (including cell morphology, cell type, and cell proportion, etc.), which can be used for cancer screening (Schiffman et al., 2000; Dillner et al., 2008), CNS hematologic malignancies (Bromberg et al., 2007) anemia diagnosis (Hao et al., 2011), and Langerhans cell granulomatosis detection (Mosterd et al., 2008).Currently, the most commonly used cytological detection methods are flow cytometry, cytological smear and nucleic acid testing. These traditional methods are characterized by high technical requirements, time consuming or high cost. Nanozymes-driven color reaction can be used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of cytological features. Trau et al. extended the application of nanozymes to the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) (Li et al., 2017). The targeting antibody-conjugated Fe3O4 nanozymes simultaneously achieved CTC magnetic isolation and visualization by catalyzing the oxidation of colorimetric substrate TMB into blue colored products. In addition, the visualized CTCs can be further quantified using UV-vis measurement. The developed nanozyme platform successfully detected 13 melanoma CTCs per mL blood within 50 min, and the concentration of Fe3O4 nanozymes used was about 0.2 mg/ml for TMB colorimetric development. Later, Wang et al. (2018) also developed an Fe3O4 NPs-based ultrasensitive electrochemical CTCs detection strategy (Tian et al., 2018). Under the optimized experimental conditions, the proposed nanozyme cytosensor exhibited significant analytical performance for MCF-7 CTCs detection with a detection limit of 6 cells mL–1 with a linear range from 15 to 45 cells mL–1 at the acceptable stability condition and reproducibility. Recently, nanozyme-based detection strategies have been broadly developed for the cytological detection of breast cancer cell (Li et al., 2019), cervical cancer cells (Yu et al., 2013; Maji et al., 2015), human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell (Ge et al., 2014), melanoma tumor cell (Li et al., 2017), and squamous cancer (Wang et al., 2014) etc.In addition to detecting CTCs, researchers also employed the catalytic activity of nanozymes to design real-time detection probes for organelle imaging in living cells. For example, Qu et al., designed a heterogeneous palladium nanozyme that could effectively mediate the bioorthogonal reactions in situ through light and thus realized the specific imaging of mitochondria in living cells (Wang et al., 2018) (Figures 2B,C). Beside CTCs and organelle imaging detection, there are also several other nanozymes-based colorimetric methods for specific disease imaging, including jaundice (Santhosh et al., 2014), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (Lin et al., 2017), diabetes (Tianran et al., 2014), infectious disease (Kim et al., 2014; Duan et al., 2015), and neurodegenerative disease (Wang C. I. et al., 2012; Farhadi et al., 2014). Thus, compared to traditional methods (such as PCR, cell flow cytometry, and ELISA), nanozymes methods exhibit more broaden prospect for live cell and organelle imaging because nanozyme assay is more fast, cost-effective and much easier to operate.
Nanozymes for In Vivo Imaging
In addition to enzyme-mimicking activity, nanozymes also exhibit fluorescence, electricity, paramagnetic properties and other unique physicochemical properties. By employing the unique physicochemical properties, nanozymes also have been broadly developed for in vivo monitoring and imaging of disease. For example, we utilized the unique r2 relaxivity of iron nanozymes and achieved tumor in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after we achieved the in vitro tumor tissue imaging by using the peroxidase-like activity of iron-based nanozymes with a single-dose of 125I-M-HFn NPs containing 45 μg HFn, 500 μCi 125I, and 11.2 μg Fe by intravenously injection (Zhao et al., 2016). We also designed a quantum-dot-based nanozyme vesicle for in vivo H2O2-responsive catalytic photoacoustic imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Ding et al., 2019). In this work, graphene quantum dots showed intense peroxidase activity and effectively catalyzed the peroxidase substrate 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) into its oxidized form. The oxidized ABTS then exhibited strong near-infrared (NIR) absorbance, rendering it to be an ideal contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. In the study, GQDzyme was at a dose of 100 μg/mL, 100 μL by an intravenously injection (Figure 3A). Jiang X. et al. (2018) achieved tumor phototherapy and simultaneous photoacoustic/thermal imaging and computed tomography by using a developed iridium oxide catalase nanozyme with extraordinary photothermal conversion efficiency and X-ray absorption coefficient showing a typical example of fully exploiting the multifunctional properties of nanozymes for tumor imaging and treatment. The BSA-IrO2 NPs used in the study was 1.5 mM, 200 μL via an intravenously injection (Jiang X. et al., 2018).
The emergence of nanozymes uncovers the biological effects of inorganic nanomaterials. Nanozymes thus can be used as an alternative of natural enzymes because of their capability to address the limitations of natural enzymes such as low stability, high cost, and difficult storage. Over the past decade, nanozyme-based probes have been widely developed for disease imaging and diagnosis from in vitro to in vivo. The typical nanozymes for disease imaging diagnosis are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.Despite the remarkable advantages of nanozymes, there still remains plenty of limitations while put nanozymes into practical clinical application, such as poor dispersibility, easy sedimentation after surface modification, limited catalytic types, poor substrate selectivity, and potential nanotoxicity. To further drive the rapid development of nanozyme-based imaging agents for disease diagnosis, substantial breakthroughs are expected by overcoming the following challenges: (1) Rational design and surface modification are still remain critical challenges to improve their substrate selectivity and dispersibility of nanozymes. Thus, both experimental and computational studies should be combined together to aid in the process of nanozyme design and surface modification. (2) A detailed understanding of the relationship between the catalytic properties and the in vivo biological behaviors of nanozymes is necessary. It is because the size, morphology and surface property of nanozymes have a direct impact on their catalytic activity and thus determine the in vivo biological behaviors of nanozymes. (3) A systematic evaluation of the biological fates and the biocompatibility of nanozyme systems (including the cytotoxicity, in vivo uptake and behavior, biodistribution, immunogenicity, blood compatibility, and tissue compatibility) should be performed when administrated into living organisms, since the biocompatibility and biodegradability are the common concerns when move these systems into clinical practice. (4) Developing standards and reference materials. Although nanozymes have shown a broad range of applications from in vitro biological detection to in vivo imaging diagnosis, there are rare basic concepts and the corresponding standards on nanozyme research. Therefore, nanozymes performance should be fully normalization according to their size, shape, modification to compare with each other when used for disease imaging diagnosis.
Author Contributions
PW, TW, ML, and XY researched the literature and wrote the review. All authors revised and polished the review.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Authors: Rui Huang; Cheng-Hsuan Li; Roberto Cao-Milán; Luke D He; Jessa Marie Makabenta; Xianzhi Zhang; Erlei Yu; Vincent M Rotello Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 15.419