Literature DB >> 32117469

On the Limit to the Accuracy of Regional-Scale Air Quality Models.

S Trivikrama Rao1,2, Huiying Luo2, Marina Astitha2, Christian Hogrefe3, Valerie Garcia3, Rohit Mathur3.   

Abstract

Regional-scale air pollution models are routinely being used world-wide for research, forecasting air quality, and regulatory purposes. It is well recognized that there are both reducible (systematic) and irreducible (unsystematic) errors in the meteorology-atmospheric chemistry modeling systems. The inherent (random) uncertainty stems from our inability to properly characterize stochastic variations in atmospheric dynamics and chemistry, and from the incommensurability associated with comparisons of the volume-averaged model estimates with point measurements. Because these stochastic variations are not being explicitly simulated in the current generation of regional-scale meteorology-air quality models, one should expect to find differences between the model estimates and corresponding observations. This paper presents an observation-based methodology to determine the expected errors from current generation regional air quality models even when the model design, physics, chemistry, and numerical analysis, as well as its input data, were "perfect". To this end, the short-term synoptic-scale fluctuations embedded in the daily maximum 8-hr ozone time series are separated from the longer-term forcing using a simple recursive moving average filter. The inherent uncertainty attributable to the stochastic nature of the atmosphere is determined based on 30+ years of historical ozone time series data measured at various monitoring sites in the contiguous United States. The results reveal that the expected root mean square error at the median and 95th percentile is about 2 ppb and 5 ppb, respectively, even for "perfect" air quality models driven with "perfect" input data. Quantitative estimation of the limit to the model's accuracy will help in objectively assessing the current state-of-the-science in regional air pollution models, measuring progress in their evolution, and providing meaningful and firm targets for improvements in their accuracy relative to ambient measurements.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32117469      PMCID: PMC7048235          DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-1627-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys        ISSN: 1680-7316            Impact factor:   6.133


  12 in total

1.  Demonstrating attainment of the air quality standards: integration of observations and model predictions into the probabilistic framework.

Authors:  C Hogrefe; S T Rao
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Efficient probabilistic estimates of surface ozone concentration using an ensemble of model configurations and direct sensitivity calculations.

Authors:  Robert W Pinder; Robert C Gilliam; K Wyat Appel; Sergey L Napelenok; Kristen M Foley; Alice B Gilliland
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences.

Authors:  N Oreskes; K Shrader-Frechette; K Belitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A New Method for Assessing the Efficacy of Emission Control Strategies.

Authors:  Huiying Luo; Marina Astitha; Christian Hogrefe; Rohit Mathur; S Trivikrama Rao
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Dynamic Evaluation of Two Decades of WRF-CMAQ Ozone Simulations over the Contiguous United States.

Authors:  Marina Astitha; Huiying Luo; S Trivikrama Rao; Christian Hogrefe; Rohit Mathur; Naresh Kumar
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Recommendations on statistics and benchmarks to assess photochemical model performance.

Authors:  Christopher Emery; Zhen Liu; Armistead G Russell; M Talat Odman; Greg Yarwood; Naresh Kumar
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Extending the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System to Hemispheric Scales: Overview of Process Considerations and Initial Applications.

Authors:  Rohit Mathur; Jia Xing; Robert Gilliam; Golam Sarwar; Christian Hogrefe; Jonathan Pleim; George Pouliot; Shawn Roselle; Tanya L Spero; David C Wong; Jeffrey Young
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.133

8.  A perspective on the development of gas-phase chemical mechanisms for Eulerian air quality models.

Authors:  William R Stockwell; Emily Saunders; Wendy S Goliff; Rosa M Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Detecting and tracking changes in ozone air quality.

Authors:  S T Rao; I G Zurbenko
Journal:  Air Waste       Date:  1994-09

10.  A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING REGIONAL-SCALE NUMERICAL PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING SYSTEMS.

Authors:  Robin Dennis; Tyler Fox; Montse Fuentes; Alice Gilliland; Steven Hanna; Christian Hogrefe; John Irwin; S Trivikrama Rao; Richard Scheffe; Kenneth Schere; Douw Steyn; Akula Venkatram
Journal:  Environ Fluid Mech (Dordr)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.551

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the manageable portion of ground-level ozone in the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Huiying Luo; Marina Astitha; S Trivikrama Rao; Christian Hogrefe; Rohit Mathur
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.235

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.