| Literature DB >> 32117333 |
Ruili Wang1,2, Haoxuan Chen1, Xinrui Liu1, Zhibo Wang3,4, Jingwen Wen1, Shuoxin Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Variation in leaf veins along environmental gradients reflects an important adaptive strategy of plants to the external habitats, because of their crucial roles in maintaining leaf water status and photosynthetic capacity. However, most studies concentrate on a few species and their vein variation across horizontal spatial scale, we know little about how vein traits shift along the vertical scale, e.g., elevational gradient along a mountain, and how such patterns are shaped by plant types and environmental factors. Here, we aimed to investigate the variation in leaf vein traits (i.e., vein density, VD; vein thickness, VT; and vein volume per unit leaf area, VV) of 93 woody species distributed along an elevational gradient (1,374-3,375 m) in a temperate mountain in China. Our results showed that altitude-related trends differed between growth forms. Tree plants from higher altitudes had lower VD but higher VT and VV than those from lower altitude; however, the opposite tend was observed in VD of shrubs, and no significant altitudinal changes in their VT or VV. Plant phylogenetic information at the clade level rather than climate explained most of variation in three leaf vein traits (17.1-86.6% vs. <0.011-6.3% explained variance), supporting the phylogenetic conservatism hypothesis for leaf vein traits. Moreover, the phylogenetic effects on vein traits differed between trees and shrubs, with the vein traits of trees being relatively more conserved. Together, our study provides new picture of leaf vein variation along the altitude, and highlights the importance of taking plant phylogeny into consideration when discussing trait variation from an ecological to a biogeographic scale.Entities:
Keywords: climate; elevational gradient; leaf venation; phylogeny; plant functional type
Year: 2020 PMID: 32117333 PMCID: PMC7012802 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Differences in leaf vein traits among plant functional groups.
| Plant functional group |
| VD (mm mm-2) | VT (μm) | VV (mm3 mm-2×10-3) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | Mean ± SD | CV | ||||
| All | 93 | 6.34 ± 2.18 | 0.34 | 30.11 ± 21.30 | 0.71 | 5.00 ± 5.66 | 1.13 | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Tree | 41 | 6.70 ± 2.49 | 0.37 | 35.05 ± 28.78 | 0.82 | 6.56 ± 7.40a | 1.13 | ||
| Shrub | 52 | 6.05 ± 1.87 | 0.31 | 26.22 ± 11.58 | 0.44 | 3.76 ± 3.35b | 0.89 | ||
|
| 0.351 (0.331) | 0.121 (0.334) | <0.001 (0.169) | ||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Needled-leaves | 3 | 3.10 ± 1.57a | 0.51 | 113.02 ± 63.03a | 0.56 | 26.72 ± 13.27a | 0.50 | ||
| Deciduous tree | 38 | 6.99 ± 2.33b | 0.33 | 28.89 ± 12.21b | 0.42 | 4.97 ± 3.76b | 0.76 | ||
| Deciduous shrub | 49 | 6.06 ± 1.91b | 0.32 | 25.82 ± 11.72b | 0.45 | 3.68 ± 3.41b | 0.93 | ||
| Evergreen shrub | 3 | 5.96 ± 1.19b | 0.20 | 32.75 ± 7.23b | 0.22 | 5.15 ± 1.93b | 0.38 | ||
|
| <0.001 (0.266) | <0.001 (0.115) | <0.001 (0.219) | ||||||
VD, vein density; VT, vein thickness; VV, vein volume per area; n, species number; CV, coefficient variation.
P and P denote the P values to test the effect of plant functional groups on the each vein trait according to standard and phylogenetic one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA).
Trait values are mean value ± 1 SD (standard deviation). Statistical differences are denoted by different letters (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Variation in vein density (VD) with plant phylogeny and growth form. Bars represent standardized values for VD, with outward and inward bars representing values above and below the mean, respectively, and colors representing different growth forms. Branch colors in phylogeny represent main phylogenetic clades. Ma, million years ago.
Figure 2(A, B) Shows the relationships between vein thickness (VT) and density (VD) by ordinary least squares (OLS) and phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) methods across all species, trees and shrubs, respectively. Model results of two methods are given in . In (B), the differences in slopes and intercepts between trees and shrubs are tested via a standardized major axis (SMA) test (results given in ). ‘Slope’, difference in standardized major axis (SMA) slopes; ‘Elevation’, difference in SMA elevations (y-intercept); NS, not significantly different; **P < 0.001.
Blomberg's K and Pagel's λ values of leaf vein traits for different growth forms.
| All | Tree | Shrub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| λ |
| λ |
| λ | |
| VD | 0.38** | 0.74** | 0.31* | 0.76* | 0.37 | < 0.01 |
| VT | 1.03 | 0.82** | 1.36* | 0.90** | 0.23 | 0.41 |
| VV | 0.77 | 0.78** | 1.05* | 0.86** | 0.15 | < 0.01 |
Trait abbreviations are provided in . *P <0.05; **P <0.01.
Figure 3Variance component analysis of vein trains across all species (A), trees (B) and shrubs (C) using phylogenetic nested analysis of variance (ANOVA). All traits are log10-transformed before analysis and their abbreviations are provided in .
Figure 4(A–C) Shows the changes in vein traits along the altitude for all species, trees, and shrubs. Error bars represent standard deviation. Different letters in each growth form indicate significant differences among altitudes (P <0.05). Trait abbreviations are provided in .
Statistical model for altitude-related variation in vein trait as a function of aridity index (AI), growth form (GF), and their interaction.
| Fixed Effect |
| VD | VT | VV | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | Std.Error |
| SS% | Estimate | Std.Error |
| SS% | Estimate | Std.Error |
| SS% | ||
| Intercept | 118 | 0.63 | 0.14 | 0.036 | 1.43 | 0.08 | < 0.001 | 0.39 | 0.15 | 0.009 | |||
| GF | 118 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.47 | −0.31 | 0.13 | 0.018 | 4.00 | -0.38 | 0.23 | 0.105 | 6.39 |
| AI | 118 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.339 | 1.12 | −0.05 | 0.09 | 0.571 | 0.53 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.764 | 1.22 |
| GF×AI | 118 | −0.35 | 0.12 | 0.005 | 1.11 | 0.57 | 0.16 | 0.001 | 9.95 | 0.86 | 0.29 | 0.004 | 12.47 |
|
| 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.15 | ||||||||||
df, degree of freedom; SS%, percentage of sum of squares explained. All the trait data are log10-transformed prior to analysis and their abbreviations are in .
Linear mixed-effects model was fit by restricted maximum likelihood. Random effects in model were ‘site’. Marginal R2 (R2 m) is concerned with variance explained by fixed factors, and conditional R2 (R2 c) is concerned with variance explained by both fixed and random factors.
Figure 5(A–C) Shows the changes in vein traits along the aridity gradient. AI, aridity index. Insignificant regression lines are shown in dotted lines (P > 0.05). Trait abbreviations are provided in .