| Literature DB >> 32117108 |
Fenghua Wang1, Wanxue Han1,2, Shuaimin Chen3, Wenxu Dong1, Min Qiao4, Chunsheng Hu1, Binbin Liu1.
Abstract
Manure, which contains lEntities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance genes; chemical fertilizer; manure; microbial community structure; mobile genetic elements
Year: 2020 PMID: 32117108 PMCID: PMC7015874 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Annual input rates of manure and chemical fertilizers in the different treatments.
| CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| N | 0 | 300 | 0 | 0 |
| NP | 0 | 300 | 120 | 0 |
| NPK | 0 | 300 | 120 | 75 |
| M | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MN | 5500 | 300 | 0 | 0 |
FIGURE 1Heatmap graph showing the profiles of ARGs in the different treatments. Each row represents a single ARG, and each column represents the soil treatment. Data were standardized using the absolute abundance of ARGs. FCA, fluoroquinolone, quinolone, florfenicol, chloramphenicol, and amphenicol; MLSB, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B.
FIGURE 2(A) Number of detected ARGs and MGEs in the different treatments. (B) The relative abundance of ARGs in the different treatments. FCA, fluoroquinolone, quinolone, florfenicol, chloramphenicol, and amphenicol; MLSB, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B; MGEs, mobile genetic elements. Different letters indicate significant differences of means in pairwise comparisons (Duncan’s test, P < 0.05) for each treatment.
FIGURE 3(A) Venn diagram illustrating the ARGs shared by the CK, N, NP, and NPK treatments. (B) The relative abundance of ARGs shared among the CK, N, NP, and NPK treatments. (C) Venn diagram illustrating the ARGs shared by the CK, M, and MN treatments and PM. (D) The relative abundance of ARGs shared among the CK, M, and MN treatments and PM. MLSB, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B. Different letters indicate significant differences of means in pairwise comparisons (Duncan’s test, P < 0.05) for each treatment.
FIGURE 4The distribution of each ARG subtype in fertilized soils determined using Circos software (http://circos.ca/). Numbers on the inner ring represent the total fold change of each fertilization treatment. Numbers on the outer ring represent the percentages of ARG subtypes in each fertilization treatment. FCA, fluoroquinolone, quinolone, florfenicol, chloramphenicol, and amphenicol; MLSB, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B.
FIGURE 5(A) The relative abundance of MGEs in different treatments. (B) Pearson correlation coefficients of the relative abundances of ARGs and MGEs across all treatments. Different letters indicate significant differences of means in pairwise comparisons (Duncan’s test, P < 0.05) for each treatment.
FIGURE 6Correlations between ARG subtypes and bacterial taxa were processed by network analysis. Each node was colored based on ARG type and microbial taxa. Each connection indicates a strong (Spearman’s correlation coefficient r2 > 0.36) and significant (P < 0.01) correlation. Edges are dependent on the coefficient values, and node size is weighted based on the relative abundance of ARGs/bacterial taxa. MLSB, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B.
FIGURE 7(A) Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealing correlations among ARGs, main phyla taxa (>1% in any sample) and soil properties. (B) Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) interpreting the effects of microbial community, soil properties and MGEs on the variations in ARGs. The absolute abundance of ARGs and MGEs was log10-transformed. The structure of the microbial community was represented using PCo1 and PCo2 from the PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distance.