| Literature DB >> 32117038 |
Daniel A Monti1, George Zabrecky1, Thomas P Leist2, Nancy Wintering1, Anthony J Bazzan1, Tingting Zhan3, Andrew B Newberg1,4.
Abstract
Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease marked by progressive neurocognitive injury. Treatment options affording neuroprotective effects remain largely experimental. The purpose of this proof of concept study was to explore the effects of N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) on cerebral glucose metabolism (CMRGlu) and symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).Entities:
Keywords: N-acetyl cysteine; antioxidant; cerebral glucose metabolism; cognition; multiple sclerosis; positron emission tomography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32117038 PMCID: PMC7033492 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1CONSORT Flow Diagram for the study participants.
Results are provided for the ROI's with significant post- vs. pre-treatment differences in the NAC and control subjects, i.e., with the presence of treatment group and timing interaction.
| Inferior frontal gyrus | Control group | −0.060 | 0.993 | (−0.456, 0.336) |
| NAC group | 0.441 | 0.022 | (0.044, 0.837) | |
| Lateral temporal gyrus | Control group | −0.805 | 0.039 | (−1.579, −0.031) |
| NAC group | 0.854 | 0.025 | (0.080, 1.629) | |
| Middle temporal gyrus | Control group | −0.774 | 0.072 | (−1.595, 0.046) |
| NAC group | 0.982 | 0.012 | (0.162, 1.803) | |
| Temporal lobe | Control group | −0.954 | 0.093 | (−2.015, 0.106) |
| NAC group | 1.000 | 0.072 | (−0.061, 2.061) | |
| Caudate | Control group | −0.100 | 0.952 | (−0.497, 0.297) |
| NAC group | 0.606 | <0.001 | (0.209, 1.003) | |
| MHI cognition | Control group | −3.056 | 0.744 | (−10.188, 4.076) |
| NAC group | 8.611 | 0.010 | (1.479, 15.742) | |
| PDQ attention | Control group | 0.917 | 0.305 | (−0.413, 2.246) |
| NAC group | −1.417 | 0.031 | (−2.746, −0.087) |
The p-values provided are for each group and the regions listed are those that were significantly different between the two groups at a p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons. Similarly, the table shows the self-reported scores of cognition and attention with the presence of treatment group and timing interaction. These were the only clinical measures that were significantly improved in the NAC group compared to the control group (p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons). Other measures of pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and overall physical function were not significantly different between the two groups.
Figure 2(A) FDG PET scans taken pre and post-NAC for an MS patient demonstrating marked improvement in the right temporal lobe cerebral glucose metabolism (arrows). (B) FDG PET scans taken pre and post-NAC for an MS patient demonstrating marked increase in caudate glucose metabolism (arrows).