| Literature DB >> 32116737 |
Sheikh Mohammad Shavik1,2, Christopher Tossas-Betancourt3, C Alberto Figueroa3,4, Seungik Baek1, Lik Chuan Lee1.
Abstract
Ventricular-arterial coupling plays a key role in the physiologic function of the cardiovascular system. We have previously described a hybrid lumped-finite element (FE) modeling framework of the systemic circulation that couples idealized FE models of the aorta and the left ventricle (LV). Here, we describe an extension of the lumped-FE modeling framework that couples patient-specific FE models of the left and right ventricles, aorta and the large pulmonary arteries in both the systemic and pulmonary circulations. Geometries of the FE models were reconstructed from magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired in a pediatric patient diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The modeling framework was calibrated with pressure waveforms acquired in the heart and arteries by catheterization as well as ventricular volume and arterial diameter waveforms measured from MR images. The calibrated model hemodynamic results match well with the clinically-measured waveforms (volume and pressure) in the LV and right ventricle (RV) as well as with the clinically-measured waveforms (pressure and diameter) in the aorta and main pulmonary artery. The calibrated framework was then used to simulate three cases, namely, (1) an increase in collagen in the large pulmonary arteries, (2) a decrease in RV contractility, and (3) an increase in the total pulmonary arterial resistance, all characteristics of progressive PAH. The key finding from these simulations is that hemodynamics of the pulmonary vasculature and RV wall stress are more sensitive to vasoconstriction with a 10% of reduction in the lumen diameter of the distal vessels than a 67% increase in the proximal vessel's collagen mass.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac mechanics; image-based modeling; pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); vascular mechanics; ventricular-arterial coupling
Year: 2020 PMID: 32116737 PMCID: PMC7025512 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Hemodynamic measurements of PAH patient.
| HR, bpm | 75 |
| LVEDV, ml | 72 |
| LVESV, ml | 25 |
| LVEF, % | 65 |
| MAP, mmHg | 68 |
| RVEDV, ml | 77 |
| RVESV, ml | 30 |
| RVEF, % | 61 |
| RVEDV/LVEDV | 1.07 |
| mPAP, mmHg | 59 |
| PCWP, mmHg | 6 |
Figure 1Reconstruction of biventricular model (left) and large proximal arteries (right) from cine MR images.
Figure 2Schematic of the finite element ventricular-vascular coupling closed loop circulatory modeling framework.
Model parameters for FE models for the baseline case.
| Passive material model | |
| Active contraction model | |
| Circulatory model | |
| Time varying elastance model of LA and RA | |
| Elastin | |
| Collagen families | |
| SMC | |
| Elastin | |
| Collagen families | |
| SMC | |
Figure 3Measurements and model predictions for the baseline case. (A) LV and RV PV loops; (B) pressure waveforms of pulmonary circulation; (C) pressure waveforms of systemic circulations; (D) LV and RV volume waveforms; (E) MPA and AO diameter waveforms.
Figure 4Scatter plot of the simulated vs. measured volume (left) and pressure (right) at all cardiac time points of the baseline case with a linear fit showing the zero-error reference.
Figure 5Hemodynamic comparison between the different simulations. (A) RV and (B) LV PV loops; (C) Pulmonary and (D) systemic circulation pressure waveforms; (E) LV and RV volume waveforms; and (F) MPA and AO diameter waveforms.
Figure 6Comparison of wall stresses in the different simulations. (A) Von-mises stress map of the pulmonary artery FE model. (B) Average von-mises wall stress waveforms in the pulmonary artery FE model. (C) Average fiber stress waveforms in the biventricular FE model and fiber stress map of baseline model.