Literature DB >> 32115796

Movement ecology and sex are linked to barn owl microbial community composition.

Ammon Corl1, Motti Charter2,3, Gabe Rozman2, Sivan Toledo4, Sondra Turjeman2, Pauline L Kamath5, Wayne M Getz6,7, Ran Nathan2, Rauri C K Bowie1,8.   

Abstract

The behavioural ecology of host species is likely to affect their microbial communities, because host sex, diet, physiology, and movement behaviour could all potentially influence their microbiota. We studied a wild population of barn owls (Tyto alba) and collected data on their microbiota, movement, diet, size, coloration, and reproduction. The composition of bacterial species differed by the sex of the host and female owls had more diverse bacterial communities than their male counterparts. The abundance of two families of bacteria, Actinomycetaceae and Lactobacillaceae, also varied between the sexes, potentially as a result of sex differences in hormones and immunological function, as has previously been found with Lactobacillaceae in the microbiota of mice. Male and female owls did not differ in the prey they brought to the nest, which suggests that dietary differences are unlikely to underlie the differences in their microbiota. The movement behaviour of the owls was associated with the host microbiota in both males and females because owls that moved further from their nest each day had more diverse bacterial communities than owls that stayed closer to their nests. This novel result suggests that the movement ecology of hosts can impact their microbiota, potentially on the basis of their differential encounters with new bacterial species as the hosts move and forage across the landscape. Overall, we found that many aspects of the microbial community are correlated with the behavioural ecology of the host and that data on the microbiota can aid in generating new hypotheses about host behaviour.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Tyto albazzm321990; behavioural ecology; microbiome; movement ecology; sexual differentiation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32115796     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  9 in total

1.  Captive Breeding and Trichomonas gallinae Alter the Oral Microbiome of Bonelli's Eagle Chicks.

Authors:  Claudio Alba; José Sansano-Maestre; María Dolores Cid Vázquez; María Del Carmen Martínez-Herrero; María Magdalena Garijo-Toledo; Iris Azami-Conesa; Virginia Moraleda Fernández; María Teresa Gómez-Muñoz; Juan Miguel Rodríguez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  No Guts About It: Captivity, But Not Neophobia Phenotype, Influences the Cloacal Microbiome of House Sparrows (Passer domesticus).

Authors:  T R Kelly; A E Vinson; G M King; C R Lattin
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 3.  The call of the wild: using non-model systems to investigate microbiome-behaviour relationships.

Authors:  Jessica A Cusick; Cara L Wellman; Gregory E Demas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  A guide to pre-processing high-throughput animal tracking data.

Authors:  Pratik Rajan Gupte; Christine E Beardsworth; Orr Spiegel; Emmanuel Lourie; Sivan Toledo; Ran Nathan; Allert I Bijleveld
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Non-invasive monitoring of multiple wildlife health factors by fecal microbiome analysis.

Authors:  Samuel B Pannoni; Kelly M Proffitt; William E Holben
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Bowel Movement: Integrating Host Mobility and Microbial Transmission Across Host Taxa.

Authors:  Arne Weinhold
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  The avian gut microbiota: Diversity, influencing factors, and future directions.

Authors:  Fengfei Sun; Junfeng Chen; Kai Liu; Meizhen Tang; Yuewei Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Comparing western (Megascops kennicottii) and whiskered (M. trichopsis) screech-owl microbiomes in southern Arizona using a novel 16S rRNA sequencing method.

Authors:  Andrew W Bartlow; S Kane Moser; Jeremy E Ellis; Charles D Hathcock; Jeanne M Fair
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-07-30

9.  The cloacal microbiome of a cavity-nesting raptor, the lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni).

Authors:  Alessandra Costanzo; Roberto Ambrosini; Andrea Franzetti; Andrea Romano; Jacopo G Cecere; Michelangelo Morganti; Diego Rubolini; Isabella Gandolfi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.061

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.