Olushola L Akinshemoyin Vaughn1, Dawn H Siegel2, Yvonne E Chiu2, Logan C DeBord3, Marcia Hogeling4, Raegan D Hunt3, Cordellia Nguyen5, Olayemi Sokumbi1, James W Verbsky6, Lisa M Arkin5. 1. Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 2. Section of Pediatric Dermatology, Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 3. Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. Division of Dermatology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 5. Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. 6. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical and histologic presentation of reactive granulomatous dermatitis (RGD) in the pediatric population. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective chart review, 7 pediatric patients with biopsy-proven RGD were identified. Photographs, histology reports, and clinical course were reviewed to discover patterns in demographics, comorbid conditions, autoimmune sequelae, drug exposures, infections, morphology, and histologic features. RESULTS: Overall, 7 patients were included and analyzed. Most were female and Hispanic. All presented with a similar dermatologic phenotype previously described in the adult literature including macular erythema and annular, pink to violaceous, edematous papules and plaques, often involving proximal extremities and extensor joints. All biopsies demonstrated variable collagen alteration and a perivascular interstitial infiltrate of histiocytes with or without mucin. Neutrophils or karyorrhexic debris were present in 4/7 of the biopsies, and eosinophils were occasionally seen (2/7 cases). In all cases, RGD was associated with active SLE or led to a new diagnosis, and initiation of systemic treatment improved cutaneous disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric RGD was more common in female patients and ethnic minorities, and strongly associated with SLE. Clinical and histologic presentations were consistent across all cases with only minor variations, suggesting that recognition and confirmation might be expedited by familiarity with these dominant patterns. Diagnosis of RGD in pediatric patients should prompt screening for SLE.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical and histologic presentation of reactive granulomatous dermatitis (RGD) in the pediatric population. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective chart review, 7 pediatric patients with biopsy-proven RGD were identified. Photographs, histology reports, and clinical course were reviewed to discover patterns in demographics, comorbid conditions, autoimmune sequelae, drug exposures, infections, morphology, and histologic features. RESULTS: Overall, 7 patients were included and analyzed. Most were female and Hispanic. All presented with a similar dermatologic phenotype previously described in the adult literature including macular erythema and annular, pink to violaceous, edematous papules and plaques, often involving proximal extremities and extensor joints. All biopsies demonstrated variable collagen alteration and a perivascular interstitial infiltrate of histiocytes with or without mucin. Neutrophils or karyorrhexic debris were present in 4/7 of the biopsies, and eosinophils were occasionally seen (2/7 cases). In all cases, RGD was associated with active SLE or led to a new diagnosis, and initiation of systemic treatment improved cutaneous disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric RGD was more common in female patients and ethnic minorities, and strongly associated with SLE. Clinical and histologic presentations were consistent across all cases with only minor variations, suggesting that recognition and confirmation might be expedited by familiarity with these dominant patterns. Diagnosis of RGD in pediatric patients should prompt screening for SLE.